Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“It's hard to quantify, right now. But at a guess, I'd say it's probably more than 50% faster, at times. It's literally that quick. We've found to be an essential practical tool. We're very satisfied.”

Walsall Council

Access all documents on CIOB

CIOB meaning

What does CIOB mean?
In construction law and procurement, “CIOB” refers to the chartered institute of building, the chartered professional body for construction management and leadership. The term is not defined in legislation or case law; it is a descriptive shorthand used in contracts, appointments and tender documents to specify qualifications or standards (for example, requiring personnel to be MCIOB/FCIOB or to comply with the CIOB Code of Conduct). CIOB operates under a Royal Charter. It accredits education, sets professional and ethical standards, confers chartered designations (Chartered Construction Manager/Chartered Builder) and maintains a complaints and disciplinary regime. In practice, CIOB membership can be cited as evidence of competence for CDM duties, selection criteria in public procurement and the standing of expert witnesses in construction disputes. Membership does not, however, create statutory competence or any reserved legal function. CIOB also publishes technical guidance and the CIOB Complex Projects Contract (2013), occasionally adopted as a standard form on major projects. Usage is consistent across England and Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland. CIOB is not a statutory regulator in any of these jurisdictions; in Ireland, statutory reserved roles (such as Assigned Certifier) remain with registered architects, engineers and surveyors.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about CIOB

NEWS
Construction law weekly: JCT D&B instructions, Building Safety Levy (England), FSO enforcement, Scottish cladding remediation and verifier reforms, anti-suit injunction on arbitral supervision, safety products guidance, content updates

In this issue: Standard form contracts Building safety Arbitration Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Construction trackers Standard form contracts A quick guide to the Employer’s power to instruct under the JCT Design & Build Contract Employers’ rights to issue instructions under the JCT suite are frequently assumed rather than scrutinised. This overview, authored by James Ladner, legal director, and Fiona Fingland, associate, at Pinsent Masons, examines the foundations and breadth of the Employer’s ability to instruct within the JCT Design and Build Contract, the constraints on that ability, including in relation to variations after practical completion, and the ramifications where parties fail to manage instructions in accordance with the contract’s terms. See News Analysis: A quick guide to the Employer’s power to instruct under the JCT Design & Build Contract. Building safety The Building Safety Levy (England) Regulations—a quick guide On 10 July 2025, the government presented the draft Building...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Weekly environmental law update: COP30 outcomes; consultations, judgments and regulatory changes across climate, energy, permitting, ESG, marine, biodiversity, waste and water (4 December 2025)

In this issue: COP30 Key developments Air emissions and climate change Energy for environmental lawyers Environmental assessment Environmental information Environmental permits and consents ESG and sustainability Hazardous substances and chemicals Marine Nature, biodiversity and habitat conservation Waste Water, flooding and drainage LexTalk®Environment: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content COP30 COP30’s Global ‘Collective Effort’—Fragments of progress By the Saturday morning when COP30 in Brazil should have concluded, negotiators secured an accord: ‘Global Mutirão: Uniting humanity in a global mobilisation against climate change’. Drawn from the Tupi-Guarani language, ‘Global Mutirão’ echoed a summit presented as one of action and delivery. The resulting text deliberately preserved the multilateral process and offered glimmers of progress, yet avoided any explicit mention of fossil fuels or of forests—despite the meeting taking place in the Amazon. This piece highlights the principal outcomes from COP30. Written by Estelle Dehon...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Construction law 2025: England, Wales and Scotland—building safety, standard forms (JCT/FIDIC/NEC), procurement, product regulation, and key cases, plus dispute resolution trends; what to expect in 2026

News Analysis: Construction law—a look at 2025 so far and ahead to the end of the year In June 2025, we released News Analysis: Construction law—a look at 2025 so far and ahead to the end of the year, where we examined the principal construction law trends that had arisen since January. In this subsequent piece, we reflect on the headlines, milestones and shifts from the closing months of 2025, and flag what we anticipate for 2026. The latter part of 2025 remained energetic. Planning and regulatory reform stayed centre stage as the government pressed on with the Planning and Infrastructure Bill, together with broader plans to cut delays and accelerate delivery of housing and infrastructure schemes. Concurrent developments in building safety, product oversight and standard form contracts contributed to a period of swift change. The courts likewise issued a sequence of judgments addressing fundamental contractual doctrines, spanning contract formation and variation, conditions precedent, collateral warranties, and the assessment of damages both in contract and under the Defective Premises...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about CIOB

PRACTICE NOTES
Construction extensions of time and loss and expense: procedural requirements, entitlement and proof under JCT, NEC, FIDIC and CIOB

Claims by contractors for time and/or money Requests from contractors seeking additional time and/or payment are commonplace on construction projects. A time claim seeks an extension of time (EoT) to complete the works (or achieve a contractual milestone) where a delay event has occurred, whereas a money claim typically pursues reimbursement of extra loss and/or expense incurred by the contractor due to delay or disruption to the works. Such a claim might likewise be brought by a sub-contractor under a sub-contract. These claims are usually founded on an express contractual entitlement—ie the contract specifies situations in which the contractor is entitled to time and/or money—and they are advanced and decided in accordance with the contract terms. They do not, of themselves, involve a breach of contract or require there to be a dispute between the parties, although they may ultimately give rise to one. This Practice Note outlines the key issues to consider in relation to time and money claims. Many of these points are relevant even...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Programme float in construction: ownership, extensions of time, and positions under SCL Protocol, JCT, NEC, FIDIC and CIOB

Working out who controls the float on a construction project is often thorny (and controversial), and it regularly features in disputes about a contractor’s right to an extension of time in practice. This Practice Note explores what float means, which party benefits from it, the treatment of float under the Society of Construction Law Delay and Disruption Protocol (SCL Protocol), together with the position regarding float within the JCT, NEC, FIDIC and CIOB standard form contracts. What is the float? Float is the surplus time, over and above the period the contractor truly requires, that is usually appended to the end of its construction programme. Put another way, it is the interval between the contractor’s expected actual completion and the date by which it is obliged under the contract to complete. The Society of Construction Law Delay and Disruption Protocol (SCL Protocol) characterises float as the time available to an activity in excess of its planned duration (p 64). It is normal for a contractor to build some...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Infrastructure construction contracts: selecting and tailoring EPC/Turnkey, NEC, FIDIC, IChemE, ICC, JCT and partnering forms; procurement models, risk allocation and bespoke drafting considerations

Infrastructure spans an extensive spectrum of assets, covering everything from schools, hospitals, highways and rail routes to wind power, electricity, waste and water schemes, as well as oil and gas installations, pipelines and processing facilities. Contractors are increasingly sharpening specialist skills and delivering infrastructure schemes across borders. Consequently, the construction contract forms in play are becoming more internationally standardised. Although infrastructure contracts share core clauses, no single template suits every scheme. Any template must be adapted to reflect the project’s particular issues and subject matter, the parties’ risk allocation, and to comply with the governing law of the contract and the project’s location. In some cases, a bespoke infrastructure construction contract is a better choice than a heavily amended standard form. Choice of contract The contract model adopted for an infrastructure build will depend on the: procurement of the works, for example: under a single construction agreement with one contractor taking single-point responsibility for delivery, such as an Engineering...

Read More Right Arrow