Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“Although cost was an important factor, our relationship with LexisNexis, their responsiveness, flexibility, and the integration available with other products were key factors.”

Irwin Mitchell

Access all documents on CITB

CITB meaning

Published by a LexisNexis Energy expert
What does CITB mean?
CITB refers, in practice, to the Construction Industry Training board, the statutory industry training board for the construction sector in Great Britain. It is best known to lawyers for administering the CITB levy on construction employers, operating grant schemes for training and apprenticeships, and overseeing skills standards (including the Health, Safety and Environment test used by most card schemes). The body is established under the Industrial Training Act 1982, with levy scope and rates set by periodic Construction Industry Training Board (Levy) Orders approved by Parliament. The term appears across procurement, construction and employment matters, including contract pricing and pass-through of levy costs, supply-chain compliance, employer registration and assessment, and due diligence on levy liabilities, exemptions and grant eligibility. Usage is consistent across England and Wales and Scotland (CITB covers Great Britain). In Northern Ireland, the equivalent is the separate statutory body CITB NI, with its own levy under Northern Ireland legislation; “CITB” there typically means CITB NI. In Ireland, there is no CITB and no CITB levy; construction training and apprenticeships are overseen by SOLAS and other national bodies. CITB formerly also acted as the sector skills body for construction.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about CITB

NEWS
Construction law briefing: Grenfell Phase 2 responses, Scottish Building Safety Levy, Welsh electric vehicle charging regulations consultation, CITB levy consensus dates, and CLC output update - 12 September 2024

In this issue: Building safety Building regulations Construction industry news Daily and weekly news alerts Construction trackers Building safety Built environment industry responses to Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 2 Report After the Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 2 Report was issued on 4 September 2024, a number of built environment bodies shared their reactions. Statements were also made by the Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer, and Fiona MacGregor, Chief Executive of the Regulator of Social Housing. See: LNB News 05/09/2024 52. Scottish Government establishes MWG after Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 Report Following publication of the Phase 2 report on 4 September 2024, the Scottish Government has set up an MWG. The report concentrated on the physical state of Grenfell Tower, with evidence taken across several modules, including the main refurbishment (overview and cladding), cladding products, internal active and passive fire safety measures, and building management...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Construction law weekly: TCC on JV adjudication and performance bonds, £35m One Hyde Park damages; Procurement Act payment reporting; building safety in Wales/Scotland; CITB levy; industry outlook.

In this issue: Adjudication Litigation Arbitration Building safety Procurement in Construction Construction industry news Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Construction trackers Adjudication Joint ventures on construction projects—who can adjudicate? (Darchem Engineering v Bouygues Travaux) The TCC declined to summarily enforce an adjudicator’s award in favour of a company that formed one half of an unincorporated joint venture. The JV, not the individual company, had been appointed as sub-contractor under a sub-contract for works at a nuclear facility. The court determined the company alone was not a party to that sub-contract, meaning the adjudicator lacked jurisdiction. The ruling underscores the need to assess carefully the legal ramifications of delivering projects through an unincorporated joint venture. See News Analysis: Joint ventures on construction projects—who can adjudicate? (Darchem Engineering v Bouygues Travaux). Litigation Defence strike out—still leaves a hill to climb in proving the claim in the absence of the defendant and...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
JCT 2024 suite released; English arbitration confirms binding dispositive awards and revival of jurisdiction; construction sector insights—weekly legal update, 17 October 2024

In this issue: JCT contracts Arbitration Construction industry news Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content New Q&As Construction trackers JCT contracts JCT releases 2024 editions of Major Project, Constructing Excellence, and Prime Cost contracts On 16 October 2024, JCT published the 2024 versions of its Major Project Construction Contract, Prime Cost Building Contract and Constructing Excellence Contract, together with the associated sub-contracts and guides. Reference copies will soon appear on Lexis+® Construction under the sub-topic 'JCT contracts 2024' within 'Standard form construction contracts', and can also be accessed via Practice Note: JCT contracts 2024—reference copies. See: LNB News 16/10/2024 34. Arbitration Binding nature of dispositive part of award and revival of tribunal’s jurisdiction in English arbitration (AZ v BY) In AZ v BY [2024] EWHC 1847 (Comm), the Commercial Court confirmed that, for arbitrations under the Arbitration Act 1996, the dispositive wording of an award is binding. The court held...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about CITB

PRACTICE NOTES
UK CIS contract payments: scope, exemptions and calculating withholding (materials, VAT, CITB), with 2026 HMRC anti-fraud powers and gross payment status changes

FORTHCOMING CHANGES : At Budget 2025, the government confirmed that it will legislate in Finance Bill 2026 (also known as Finance (No 2) Bill 2024–26) to introduce new HMRC powers to combat fraud perpetrated by businesses operating within the CIS. Mirroring VAT rules that restrict input tax recovery where a supplier knew, or should have known, that a supply was connected to the fraudulent evasion of VAT, the forthcoming CIS provisions will: provide for the immediate cancellation of a business’s gross payment status make a business liable for tax that has been lost, and permit a penalty of 30% of the lost tax to be imposed on the business, its directors and other connected persons, where it can be demonstrated that the business knew or ought to have known that it had entered into a transaction linked to the fraudulent evasion of tax Further, the period before a business can reapply for gross payment status following an immediate removal will be...

Read More Right Arrow