“We have to become more agile as our clients' expectations and requirements change. The only thing we know is that tomorrow is going to be different and we must be prepared. With LexisNexis, I feel more confident of that we're ready every time.”
Wolverhampton County CouncilAccess all documents on Class rights
Procedure for amending the articles of association Matters to review or actions to undertake Refer to the pertinent section of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) and/or relevant Lexis+® UK material Tick box once step is complete or issue considered Getting ready to revise the articles and initial checks Will the proposed change oblige shareholders to take up additional shares, or increase a member’s liability? If so, shareholders’ approval will be necessary for the proposed alteration...
STOP PRESS: A major overhaul of the UK listing framework took effect on 29 July 2024, removing the premium and standard segments and introducing a single listing category for equity shares in commercial companies. The commercial companies category is strongly disclosure-led, with an emphasis on transparency, and sits alongside other listing categories, such as shell companies, secondary listing and closed-ended investment fund categories. A new UK Listing Rules sourcebook came into force to deliver and implement the reforms, and the previous Listing Rules sourcebook was revoked in full. For further details, see Practice Note: Reform of the UK listing regime—fundamentals. This Checklist reflects the regime as it stood before 29 July 2024. The allotment and issue of shares are governed by statutory rules, which vary according to the type of company proposing the allotment (private or public, listed or unlisted) and whether that company has a single class or multiple classes of shares. This checklist sets out the procedure for a listed company to allot shares and to...
Parties Who are the parties involved? In particular, specify: the investor(s) the managers the investee company (newco) Conditions Are there any conditions to completing the investment? What are each party’s obligations to meet those conditions, and by what deadline? Share subscription What will the investee company’s capital structure be? Which class and how many shares will each shareholder (the investor, the managers and any other shareholders) subscribe for? Warranties Who will give the warranties? Is it limited to the managers? Will they be provided jointly, jointly and severally, or on a several basis? How wide will the warranties be? It is usual for investment agreement warranties to centre on the business plan and the managers, as the acquisition agreement generally affords the investor sufficient protection regarding the company. What restrictions will apply to warranty claims? These may include: periods within which claims must be notified caps on each warrantor’s liability and on...
Haytop Country Park Ltd v Amber Valley Borough Council [2025] EWCA Civ 1442 What are the practical implications of this case? The ruling underlines that site licensing is to be undertaken on the basis that it dovetails with the planning system. Licence conditions cannot expand, override, or undermine the limits of extant planning permissions, nor the results of planning enforcement; together, these create the ‘planning baseline’ which the licensing authority is both entitled and obliged to factor in. Where an enforcement notice has conclusively found that operational works (for example, hardstandings or terraces) are unlawful and must be taken up, a site licence ought not to sanction plots reliant upon, or effectively reinstating, those works. An operator wishing to move away from the planning baseline must pursue a new application under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (TCPA 1990), rather than seeking to rely on licence conditions. Class B rights under the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015, SI 2015/596 only arise where...
FTT holds payments to employees under tax avoidance scheme were taxable earnings despite purported repayment obligation (GW Martin & Co Limited & another v HMRC) GW Martin & Co Ltd & another v The Commissioners for HMRC [2025] UKFTT 1147 (TC). The appellants transferred sums to employees on the basis that those employees would subscribe for a newly created class of shares in the appellants (the Shares). These Shares conferred no voting power, no dividend entitlement, and only very limited rights in the event of a winding up. The structure was intended to sidestep PAYE and NICs liabilities while also delivering a corporation tax deduction. The sums advanced were not loans; rather, they were conditional on staff taking up Shares with a nominal value mirroring the payments. Only 1% of that nominal amount was paid up, leaving the remaining 99% uncalled, so the cash flowed to employees while the issued share capital largely remained unpaid...
The artists' complaint Filed in California federal court on 3 May 2024, the artists’ lawsuit focuses on Imagen, a text‑to‑image diffusion system that employs machine learning to create pictures from user prompts. Comparable legal actions have been brought against other artificial intelligence (AI) firms, this appears to be the first aimed at Google LLC’s iteration, their counsel told Law360 on 29 April 2024. Matthew Butterick, one of the solicitors for the artists, stated on 29 April 2024 that the pleading outlines another episode of a multi‑trillion‑dollar technology giant opting to train a commercial AI tool on others’ copyrighted material without consent, attribution or payment. The claim asserts that Imagen is trained by duplicating an enormous volume of digital images and extracting protected expression from those works. The artists said it relies on a dataset assembled by the non‑profit Large‑scale Artificial Intelligence Open Network, or LAION. They added: during model training, the images in the dataset are copied in their entirety and wholly absorbed by the system, such that protected...
Premier Oil is among a number of oil and gas companies that have reassessed their funding options to cope with the effects of an extended period of low crude prices. Brexit impact From exit day (31 January 2020), the UK ceased to be an EU Member State. Nevertheless, under the Withdrawal Agreement, the UK entered an implementation period, during which EU law continued to apply. In many Brexit SIs, references to exit day should be construed as referring to IP completion day (the end of the implementation period, defined in clause 39 as 31 December 2020 at 11.00 pm), unless that wording is expressly disapplied by the relevant SI. For more detail, see News Analysis: Brexit—impact of the Withdrawal Agreement and European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 2020 for R&I lawyers, and Brexit Bulletin—key updates, research tips and resources. While schemes do not fall within the scope of the Recast Regulation on Insolvency, their later recognition frequently depends on Brussels I (recast) (see below and Practice Note: Brexit—impact on...
Pre-emption rights on allotment Pre-emption rights on allotment provide every shareholder in a company with a means to guard against dilution of their percentage stake where this could result from a share allotment, the issue of rights to subscribe for shares, the conversion of securities into shares, or a disposal of treasury shares by that company. This Practice Note addresses the pre-emption rights applicable to an allotment of equity securities by a public company that is neither a listed company nor an AIM company (that is, an unlisted public company), as prescribed in the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006). Close attention should be paid to the breadth of those statutory pre-emption rights, because an unlisted public company must observe them to the extent that they have not been disapplied, varied, waived, or excluded and ensure that it complies with them to that extent...
For many companies, intellectual property rights (IPRs) constitute an increasingly important and significant asset class. Although contemporary technology firms, pharmaceutical businesses and industrial players are most closely and very commonly linked with holding portfolios rich in IPRs, even the least likely organisations may own rights that are fundamental to them and, without which, they simply could not operate (or do so as effectively or profitably) or would suffer significant loss of value. As a broad category, IPRs are wide-ranging and inherently diverse indeed. According to context, there are, in particular, rights beyond the best known (patents, trade marks and copyright) that may—or may not—be generally regarded strictly as IPRs, such as database rights, websites with their associated domain names, goodwill and contractual rights allied to IPRs. For further detail on the principal types of intellectual property rights an insolvency practitioner as office holder may encounter, see Practice Note: IP right comparison table. Patents, design rights and trade marks depend for their existence and protection on registration (at the...
ORDINARY RESOLUTION THAT [ subject to and contingent upon [ insert any conditions relating to the exercise of the authority to sub-divide shares ], ] [ [ insert number ] OR the whole of the ] [ insert class ] shares of [ insert nominal value ] each in the capital of the Company [ held by [ insert name ] ] [ , bearing numbers [ insert number ] to [ insert number ] inclusive, ] be split into [ insert number ] [ insert class ] shares of [ insert nominal value ] each [ , bearing numbers [ insert number ] to [ insert number ] inclusive ] , with the rights and restrictions attaching to those shares (save as to nominal value) remaining unaltered by such sub-division...
VERIFICATION NOTES These verification notes concern the prospectus (the Prospectus ) to be issued in connection with the proposed [ placing OR placing and open offer OR rights issue ] ( Capital Raising ) of [ up to ] [ insert number ] new [ insert class ] shares of [ insert nominal value ] each (the Shares ) of [ insert name of the Company ] together with the admission of the Shares to listing on the Official List of the Financial Conduct Authority ( FCA ) and to trading on the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange ( Main Market ). These Verification Notes (the Notes ) have been prepared by [ insert details of Company's solicitors ] for the purposes of protecting the Company, the directors of the Company (the Directors ) [ , the Proposed Directors of the Company (the Proposed Directors ) ] and others involved with the Capital Raising and the drafting of the Prospectus, which relates to the application for the...
[ On reporting accountants’ letterhead ] The Directors [ Insert company and sponsor details ] [ Insert date ] Dear [ insert name ] [ Insert name of company ] (the Company): [ Placing AND/OR Open offer AND/OR Rights issue ] of [ insert number ] [ insert class ] shares of [ insert nominal value ] each Further to our engagement letter dated [ insert date ], we performed the procedures below on the Statement of Capitalisation and Indebtedness of the [ Company OR Company's group ] included in the Company’s prospectus dated [ insert date ]. The Statement of Capitalisation and Indebtedness was prepared by, and is solely the responsibility of, the Company’s directors. Procedures [ Insert procedures undertaken re the Statement of Capitalisation and Indebtedness ]. Opinion Solely from the procedures above, [ insert opinion, e.g. nothing has come to our attention to indicate that the Statement of Capitalisation and Indebtedness requires adjustment ]. Other matters ...
This Q&A considers a landlord’s ability to deal with their premises following service of a notice under section 13 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 (LRHUDA 1993). Once a section 13 notice is served, a statutory process begins that enables flat tenants to act together to buy the freehold of their building. The rights created by that notice ought to be safeguarded by entering an agreed or unilateral notice on the freehold title, or, where the landlord’s title is unregistered, by registering a class C(iv) land charge...