Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
Glossary detail
CASE STUDY

“A lot of the work that I do is historic-the maximum sentences change at different points of time. It's really complicated and people get it wrong all the time. That's when having a timeline is really useful.”

1 High Pavement

Access all documents on Co-operative joint venture

Co-operative joint venture meaning

What does Co-operative joint venture mean?
A co-operative joint venture is a collaboration where two or more undertakings coordinate specific activities (for example R&D, production, purchasing, marketing or shared services) without creating, or without operating through, a stand-alone full‑function business. The term is descriptive and used in competition and merger control practice, contrasting with a full‑function joint venture that is a concentration. EU/EEA: such arrangements are generally treated as agreements, not concentrations, so they are not notifiable under the EU Merger Regulation. They must be self‑assessed under Article 101 TFEU and any national equivalents, including consideration of block exemptions (for example, R&D or specialisation). Some jurisdictions (for example, Germany) and certain non‑EEA regimes (for example, Canada) may require merger filings for co‑operative ventures in defined circumstances. UK: typically outside UK merger control under the Enterprise Act 2002 unless the venture gives rise to an enterprise ceasing to be distinct (for example, a full‑function JV or acquisition of control over assets). Parties must self‑assess under the Chapter I prohibition in the Competition Act 1998, manage information exchange, avoid hardcore restrictions and consider applicable block exemptions. Ireland: similarly, usually not notifiable to the CCPC unless it constitutes a merger or acquisition; otherwise assessed under section 4 of the Competition Act...
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about Co-operative joint venture

NEWS
EU competition law daily: Commission Phase I merger clearances, simplified notifications; Ryanair Reg 1/2003 reference; General Court KRKA/Servier order; calendar (26 January 2026)

Mergers The Commission cleared: Hartree Partners Holdings, LP’s acquisition of exclusive control of Touton S.A. (M.12189), following a phase I investigation—see further in Midday Express the establishment of a joint venture by EVH Grüne Energie – Beteiligung GmbH & Co. KG and HSBC Alternative Investments S.C.A. SICAV-RAIF (M.12240), following a phase I investigation—see further in Midday Express the setting up of a joint venture by RCL Cruises Ltd....

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
EU competition law daily: merger clearances and new notifications; EIRD appeal to the Court of Justice; upcoming dates (12 March 2024)

Mergers The Commission has authorised: Investindusrial SA to secure sole control of Fassi Holding Srl (M.11471) following a phase I investigation—see further, Midday Express the establishment of a joint venture by Mitsui & Co., Ltd, Osaka Gas Co., and RWE Offshore Wind Japan Murakami-Tainai K.K...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
EU competition law update: Commission merger filings and clearances; French rail freight state aid approval; Wizz Air General Court challenge to TAROM aid; upcoming dates (27 October 2025)

Mergers Notifications received for: NewPrinces/Carrefour Italia (M.12121) under the normal procedure; and Tata Motors/Iveco Group (M.12138), Hartree/ED&F Man Chile (M.12149), Amphenol/Commscope (Connectivity and Cable Solutions) (M.12173) plus KKR/Cinven/CVC/Nemean Midco (M.12191) under the simplified procedure. Clearances covered: Ferrero Group’s acquisition of sole control of CPK SAS (M.12086); a joint venture by EVH Grüne Energie – Beteiligung GmbH & Co. KG and HSBC Alternative Investments S.C.A. SICAV-RAIF (M.12128); joint control of Heroiks SAS by LBO France Gestion SAS and EMZ Partners SAS (M.12167); and joint control of Vinventions Holding S.à r.l. by L-GAM II SCSp and Hayfin Capital Management LLP (M.12171), each following a phase I investigation—see Midday Express. State aid The Commission approved, under EU State aid rules, a French scheme reimbursing the T2 surcharge owed by rail freight operators for certain statutory employees—see the press release. An application has been lodged with the General Court in Case T-478/25, Wizz Air Hungary and Wizz Air Malta v Commission, challenging Decision...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Co-operative joint venture

PRACTICE NOTES
Direct tax treatment of joint property arrangements: legal co‑ownership, bare trusts, partnership characterisation and ATED

The most straightforward way to invest in property together is for the investors to hold the asset jointly. Though this is comparatively uncommon in a commercial setting, where investors tend to create a structure such as a partnership or a company to serve as the joint venture vehicle, it still represents the prevailing and most familiar form of joint investment. For many individual investors, this is the route most often taken in practice. Contractual joint ownership Contractual joint ownership can take several forms, including: where each participant holds a direct legal interest in the asset (see Practice Note: Establishing a beneficial interest (joint ownership)) where a trust—express or implied—is established over the property, so that trustees hold the property for the trust’s beneficiaries (see Practice Note: Trusts of land—property) where an implied partnership arrangement is in place (see Practice Note: Forming a general partnership and continuing obligations) This Practice Note examines each of these joint ownership routes, their direct tax...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Burundi merger control: 2025 launch, thresholds pending; mandatory notification/standstill when met; post-completion notice below thresholds; joint venture and foreign-to-foreign coverage; COMESA/EAC interface; process and sanctions

Note—to check whether notification thresholds in Burundi and worldwide are satisfied, please see: Where to Notify. 1. Have there been recent developments regarding the regime? What are the main points of interest and are any further updates/developments expected? Are there any other ‘hot’ merger control issues in Burundi? Burundi operates a merger control framework, and a decree setting out the organisation and functioning of Burundi’s Independent Competition Commission (the Commission) has been effective since 30 October 2023. The Commission was, however, formally launched in Burundi on 25 April 2025. Among the Commission’s responsibilities is determining matters within its remit, in particular collective anti-competitive practices as defined by Law No. 1/06 of 25 March 2010 on the Legal Regime of Competition, Burundi (Competition Act)...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
CJEU upholds Toshiba’s joint and several liability for joint venture’s CRT cartel; decisive influence inferred from veto rights; €82.8m fine confirmed

CASE HUB (date of judgment—18/01/2017) For more, see: timeline, commentary and related/similar cases Case facts ARCHIVED — this archived case hub captures the position as at the 18 January 2017 decision date; it is no longer being maintained. Outline An appeal was lodged against the General Court’s ruling that only partially annulled the Commission decision of 5 December 2012 identifying infringements of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and, therefore, holding that Toshiba remains jointly and severally responsible for the conduct of a former joint venture arising from that venture’s direct participation in a cartel covering the supply of cathode ray tubes (the ‘TV tubes cartel’). On 18 January 2017, the Court of Justice dismissed Toshiba’s challenge in full, thereby confirming the €82.8m fine imposed jointly and severally on Toshiba (together with Panasonic and Toshiba’s former joint venture, Matsushita Toshiba Picture Display Co Ltd (MTPD)—now called MT Picture JV) for MTPD’s involvement in the cartel on the market for cathode ray...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Precedents about Co-operative joint venture

PRECEDENTS
EU Merger Regulation: Full-Function Joint Ventures—Practitioner Guide, Assessment Questionnaire and Notification Guidance

Overview Joint ventures cover a wide spectrum of commercial arrangements, from merger-style integrations to co-operation confined to particular functions such as production, distribution, or research and development (R&D). This questionnaire seeks sufficient detail about the joint venture’s activities to enable an initial assessment of whether it is a full-function joint venture for the purposes of the EU Merger Regulation (Council Regulation No 139/2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings). If it is a full-function venture with an EU dimension (meaning the turnover thresholds are satisfied), the joint venture must be notified to the European Commission (the Commission) and cannot proceed until the Commission has found it compatible with the internal market. If the joint venture is not full-function and operates as a partnership that is, to a large extent, dependent on its parent companies, the establishment of the joint venture does not require notification; however, the Commission may exercise control after the fact, in light of Article 10(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union...

Read More Right Arrow