Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
Related Content
CASE STUDY

“Because of the pure breadth and depth of black letter law research and practical guidance that LexisNexis provides, we don't have to rely on counsel as much as perhaps firms that don't use LexisNexis.”

KaurMaxwell

Access all documents on COL

COL meaning

Published by a LexisNexis Energy expert
What does COL mean?
In nuclear project work, COL means a US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Combined License that authorises construction of a new reactor and, once pre-operational conditions are met, its operation. It is a defined US regulatory instrument under 10 CFR Part 52, combining what were historically separate construction permits and operating licences. A COL typically incorporates design certification references and site-specific Inspections, Tests, Analyses and Acceptance Criteria (ITAAC) that must be satisfied before fuel load. For UK and Irish practitioners, COL is encountered in cross-border M&A, project finance, due diligence and contracts involving US new nuclear build. It does not exist in UK or Irish law. There is no single UK equivalent: new build requires a nuclear site licence from the Office for Nuclear Regulation, a Development Consent Order (England and Wales) or other planning consent, environmental permits (e.g., Environment Agency/SEPA) and, at design level, participation in the Generic Design Assessment. Ireland and Northern Ireland have no nuclear generation; Ireland prohibits nuclear electricity generation. Usage of COL is consistent across UK jurisdictions as a descriptive reference to the US regime; the underlying legal effect derives solely from US federal law and NRC practice.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about COL

NEWS
Local government weekly legal highlights—England and Wales (5 February 2026): social housing, adult social care, judicial review, governance, finance, children’s services, education, procurement, licensing, pensions and planning

In this issue: Social housing Adult social care Judicial review Governance Local government finance Children's social care Education Public procurement Licensing Pensions Planning LexTalk®Local Government: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Social housing Microwave alone insufficient to amount to ‘cooking facilities’ in HMO test (Oxford Hotel Investments Ltd v Great Yarmouth BC) In Oxford Hotel Investments Ltd v Great Yarmouth Borough Council, the Upper Tribunal (UT) assessed the meaning of cooking facilities within the section 254 Housing Act 2004 (HA 2004) HMO test, specifically whether a single microwave fulfilled that requirement. The property had no other means for preparing food. The UT determined that a microwave on its own does not constitute cooking facilities capable of excluding the premises from the definition of an HMO, and consequently found the property formed part of an HMO and was subject to the HA 2004 regime....

Read More Right Arrow