Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
Related Content

Related Glossary Terms

CASE STUDY

“I'm able to do more in the day, which means I'm providing more value to my clients - and it's helped my margins in terms of how much I can bill. LexisNexis is helping me make money.”

ParrisWhittaker

Access all documents on Collateralised debt obligation

Collateralised debt obligation meaning

What does Collateralised debt obligation mean?
In legal practice, a collateralised debt obligation (cdo) is a structured finance securitisation in which a special purpose vehicle (SPV) acquires a portfolio of debt (for example corporate loans, bonds or asset-backed securities) and issues tranched notes to investors. Cash flows from the collateral are applied through a contractual waterfall to pay interest and principal, with senior, mezzanine and equity tranches bearing differing credit risk and return. Credit enhancement includes subordination, over-collateralisation, reserve accounts and hedging. The term is descriptive rather than statutory, but in the UK and Ireland CDOs are treated in regulation as securitisations (with due diligence, risk retention, disclosure and transparency obligations under the UK/EU Securitisation Regulation). Variants include cash-flow and synthetic CDOs; collateralised loan obligations (CLOs) and collateralised bond obligations (CBOs) are sub-types. CDOs are typically marketed to professional investors; UK and Irish occupational pension schemes may invest subject to investment rules and trustee duties. Documentation comprises an offering circular/prospectus, trust deed or indenture, security and servicing agreements. Structures are commonly governed by English or Irish law, with Irish SPVs established under section 110 TCA 1997 and listings on Euronext Dublin. Usage and analysis are consistent across England and Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about Collateralised debt obligation

NEWS
UBS v KWL: English Court of Appeal finds bribery and dishonest assistance render derivatives contract unenforceable; agency analysis rejected; rescission granted for unconscionability

Original news UBS AG (London Branch) and another v Kommunale Wasserwerke Leipzig; UBS Ltd v Depfa Bank plc; UBS AG (London Branch) v Landesbank Baden-Württemberg [2017] EWCA Civ 1567, [2017] All ER (D) 119 (Oct). The Court of Appeal (Civil Division) concluded that the judge had been wrong to decide that the financial advisers were acting as the claimants’ agents when arranging for their client, the principal defendant, to enter into a single tranche collateralised debt obligation (STCDO), and to treat any bribe as within that agency, thereby fixing the claimants with legal responsibility despite their lack of knowledge. The court further held that, because the claimants dishonestly assisted the advisers’ abuse of their fiduciary duty to the principal defendant, the bribe tainted the claimants’ conscience, making it inequitable for them to enforce the STCDO secured through that bribe. What was this case about? This dispute principally concerns challenges to the validity and enforceability of derivatives concluded by UBS and others with a German municipal water company...

Read More Right Arrow