“I'm able to do more in the day, which means I'm providing more value to my clients - and it's helped my margins in terms of how much I can bill. LexisNexis is helping me make money.”
ParrisWhittakerAccess all documents on Collateralised debt obligation
Original news UBS AG (London Branch) and another v Kommunale Wasserwerke Leipzig; UBS Ltd v Depfa Bank plc; UBS AG (London Branch) v Landesbank Baden-Württemberg [2017] EWCA Civ 1567, [2017] All ER (D) 119 (Oct). The Court of Appeal (Civil Division) concluded that the judge had been wrong to decide that the financial advisers were acting as the claimants’ agents when arranging for their client, the principal defendant, to enter into a single tranche collateralised debt obligation (STCDO), and to treat any bribe as within that agency, thereby fixing the claimants with legal responsibility despite their lack of knowledge. The court further held that, because the claimants dishonestly assisted the advisers’ abuse of their fiduciary duty to the principal defendant, the bribe tainted the claimants’ conscience, making it inequitable for them to enforce the STCDO secured through that bribe. What was this case about? This dispute principally concerns challenges to the validity and enforceability of derivatives concluded by UBS and others with a German municipal water company...