Powered by Lexis+®
CASE STUDY

“Because of the pure breadth and depth of black letter law research and practical guidance that LexisNexis provides, we don't have to rely on counsel as much as perhaps firms that don't use LexisNexis.”

KaurMaxwell

Access all documents on Common assessment framework

Common assessment framework meaning

What does Common assessment framework mean?
An inter-agency early help assessment and planning process to identify a child’s health, development and welfare needs and coordinate support where there are concerns below the child protection threshold. It is a practice term rather than a statutory definition. In England and Wales it originated as the Common Assessment Framework (CAF) under government guidance; many areas now use the Early Help Assessment (EHA), but CAF remains a recognised descriptor in safeguarding and education practice. Key features include: a single, holistic assessment; parental/young person consent to information sharing unless there is a safeguarding risk; appointment of a lead professional; a multi-agency plan with review; and clear escalation routes to children’s social care where significant harm is suspected. It is frequently used by schools, health services and voluntary agencies and may inform later public law proceedings, though it does not of itself trigger statutory powers. Jurisdictional equivalents are broadly consistent in purpose: Scotland applies the GIRFEC National Practice Model and Child’s Plan; Northern Ireland uses the UNOCINI assessment framework; Ireland employs Tusla’s Meitheal model. Practitioners should follow local safeguarding/child protection guidance (e.g., Working Together in England) for thresholds and information-sharing.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about Common assessment framework

NEWS
EU law weekly briefing: key consultations, rulings and policy updates on competition, GDPR, CSRD/ESRS, Taxonomy, climate targets, AI Act, financial services, sanctions and trade defence — 13 November 2025

In this issue: Commercial Competition Corporate Data protection and cybersecurity Free movement, immigration and employment Financial services Energy Environment Life sciences Regulatory TMT International trade Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Trackers Commercial Commission consults on evaluation of market surveillance regulation The European Commission has launched a consultation to assess and, if needed, update the Market Surveillance Regulation (EU) 2019/1020. It aims to strengthen the operation of the single market by boosting compliance with EU product harmonisation rules, with any amendments scheduled for Commission adoption in Q3 2026. The consultation closes on 4 February 2026. See: LNB News 12/11/2025 22. Commission consults on New Legislative Framework revision The Commission’s Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs (DG GROW H4) has opened a consultation to underpin the revamp of the New Legislative Framework (NLF) governing product law, seeking to capture stakeholder views on...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
UK Public Law Weekly: Brexit frameworks and SIs; electoral reform; major judicial review and ECHR rulings; FOI decisions; procurement updates; courts and inquiry developments — 24 July 2025

In this issue: Brexit highlights Brexit SIs Post-Brexit transition guidance Constitutional and administrative law Equality and human rights Judicial review Information law Public procurement Subsidy control and State aid Other Public Law news Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Useful information Brexit highlights Cabinet Office publishes evaluation of Common Frameworks The Cabinet Office has released a review of the Common Frameworks, assessing how the UK Government and the devolved administrations collaborate after Brexit. Drawing on proforma data across 28 frameworks and six case studies, the review concluded that, although the frameworks support effective intergovernmental collaboration, there is scope to enhance cross-framework alignment, stakeholder participation and central guidance. It also observed that many processes within the frameworks remain untried, with limited examples of formal dispute resolution or managing divergence, and recommends continued evaluation as the frameworks mature. See: LNB News 18/07/2025...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
UK Private Client weekly update: gifts mortis causa ruling, PACS jurisdiction, COP residence/capacity, SDLT MDR abolition guidance, FTT tax cases, HM Land Registry PG9, international developments—6 June 2024

In this issue: Probate Powers of attorney and advance decisions Court of Protection Spouses, civil partners and cohabitants HMRC Manuals updates Tax avoidance, evasion and non-compliance Insolvency—Private Client Digital assets and cryptoassets Pensions, insurance and tax efficient investments International Question of the week Daily and weekly news alerts LexTalk®Private Client: a Lexis®PSL community New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Latest Q&As Useful information Probate Court finds deceased had made gifts mortis causa (Rahman v Hassan) Mini summary: GIFTS—GIFTS MORTIS CAUSA—DECLARATIONS. The Chancery Division granted the claimant’s application for declarations concerning dealings between the claimant and the deceased individual. The deceased had effected ‘donationes mortis causa’ while contemplating his death. The defendants, relations by blood of the deceased’s late wife, expressly resisted the claim on the basis that, at the date of death, the will had not been executed so as to capture,...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Common assessment framework

PRACTICE NOTES
NSIP DCO examination procedure: fast-track, written representations, hearings, changes, local impact reports, statements of common ground, and decision-making under the Planning Act 2008 (including forthcoming 2025 amendments)

The Planning Act 2008 (PA 2008) establishes the consent framework for nationally significant infrastructure projects (NSIPs) across energy, transport, water, waste water and waste. Decisions on development consent order (DCO) applications may be taken by reference to any relevant National Policy Statements (NPSs), which articulate national policy for NSIPs. See Practice Note: National Policy Statements. While the Secretary of State (SoS) is legally accountable for the decision, in practice the government entrusts acceptance and examination of applications to the Planning Inspectorate (PINS). See Practice Note: Examination of nationally significant infrastructure projects—general. The government has issued a ‘Collection: National Infrastructure Planning Guidance Portal’, containing guidance on NSIP pre-examination, the examination itself, the fast-track route for NSIPs, and awards of costs relating to the examination of DCO applications. Collectively, these provisions define the route by which nationally significant schemes are assessed and authorised, with guidance set out in practice notes and the collection. Fast-track process Under PA 2008, s 98(1), the Examining Authority (EA) must conclude examination of the application...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Kinship and Connected Person Foster Placements for Looked After Children in England: Legal Framework, Assessment, Temporary Approval, Review and Common Pitfalls

Practice Note This Practice Note sets out a high-level summary of the principal legislation and processes for placing looked after children with a connected person acting as a foster carer. It explains: who qualifies as a connected person; the steps for arranging a placement with a connected person; the assessment route for approving a connected person as a foster carer, including interim approval; the approach to reviewing any approval; and frequent mistakes when carrying out assessments. Please note, the material here reflects the current position in England. In Wales, this field is governed by the Social Services and Well-being (Wales) Act 2014 and associated statutory instruments. For more detail on children’s social care in Wales, consult the following Practice Notes: Local authority powers and duties to provide accommodation for children in Wales, Local authority duties to looked after children in Wales and Local authority duties to children in Wales—child protection...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
EU competition law and IP agreements: practical guide to Technology Transfer, R&D and Vertical Block Exemptions, hardcore/excluded restrictions, market-share thresholds and risk assessment under Article 101 TFEU

Intellectual property (IP) agreements IP arrangements—such as technology licensing or collaborating on the creation of new technologies—can restrict competition. Yet their pro‑competitive advantages are acknowledged through block exemptions that offer a ‘safe harbour’ from Article 101, TFEU. Where a deal sits squarely within a relevant block exemption, only a brief review of Article 101, TFEU concerns is typically required. In practice, though, multiple block exemptions may seem to apply, and confirming that an agreement truly benefits from a safe harbour can be challenging—so a more pragmatic assessment of everyday commercial deals is often warranted. Most block exemptions share a common framework, and understanding this helps with application of the rules. Recitals: set out the overarching aim and rationale of the instrument. Definitions: clarify key terms that shape how the exemption should operate. Scope of the ‘safe harbour’: identifies the categories of agreements covered and the types of undertakings involved. From a practical standpoint, it is wise to scrutinise the recitals and...

Read More Right Arrow