Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“What I spend on my yearly subscription, equals to a day's billable hours for me not to mention time efficiency and peace of mind.”

Jai Stern

Access all documents on Conclusions

Conclusions meaning

Published by a LexisNexis EU Law expert
What does Conclusions mean?
In EU legal practice, “Conclusions” are formal statements adopted—most commonly by the European Council or the Council of the EU—setting out political priorities, common positions, or invitations to take action. They are used to coordinate Member State responses and to steer future legislation or implementation, but do not themselves create rights or obligations. Conclusions are a form of EU soft law. They are not among the legal acts listed in Article 288 TFEU and are not defined as binding in the Treaties, although the TEU recognises the European Council’s role in defining general political directions through its conclusions. They carry persuasive authority only. Courts and practitioners may refer to them as contextual or interpretative material when considering EU measures, policy choices or proportionality, but they have no direct legal force. - Ireland: Conclusions do not bind the State or its courts, but they frequently shape the EU legislative agenda and national policy-making. - United Kingdom (England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland): Following Brexit, EU Conclusions do not bind UK institutions. They may, on occasion, be used as background when construing retained EU law or assessing international commitments, but they have no legal effect.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about Conclusions

NEWS
Energy law weekly update, 9 May 2024: climate plan ruling, Ofgem LFCRP, Great Grid Partnership, CCS licensing round, fusion NPS, CO2 transport, EU gas CAM NC and EPBD

In this issue: Key developments and materials Electricity and gas market regulation and licensing Networks and network connections Conventional power, waste to energy, biomass, and CHP projects Nuclear energy Air emissions, efficiency, and climate change International energy Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Key developments and materials Friends of the Earth has won a pivotal High Court judgment against the government, with the court ruling that the climate strategy advanced by the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero is unlawful. The court determined that adopting the Carbon Budget Delivery Plan contravened the Climate Change Act 2008. See: LNB News 03/05/2024 70. Electricity and gas market regulation and licensing Ofgem has released its conclusions on the consultation regarding updates to the licence fee cost recovery principles (LFCRP) and issued the LFCRP for May 2024. After reviewing consultees’ submissions, Ofgem confirmed it...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Weekly energy law update: Ofgem decisions, grid and flexibility reforms, hydrogen/LDES support, CHMM guidance, CfD and planning changes, nuclear siting policy, EU State aid/infrastructure actions—13 March 2025

In this issue: Electricity and gas market regulation and licensing Renewable energy Capacity Market, balancing services and energy system flexibility Conventional power, waste to energy, biomass, and CHP projects Nuclear energy Planning issues in energy projects International energy Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Electricity and gas market regulation and licensing Ofgem publishes determinations on code manager selection for REC and BSC Ofgem has issued two determinations, setting out its conclusions under section 187(1) of the Energy Act 2023 to move ahead with appointing code managers for the Balancing and Settlement Code (BSC) and the Retail Energy Code (REC) without running a competition. As a consequence, both the Retail Energy Code Company Ltd and Elexon Ltd will, respectively, be asked to provide a licensing assessment form. Ofgem will subsequently review the submissions and confirm whether it proposes to award each entity a licence. See:...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
UK Supreme Court: necessity test under Mental Health (Northern Ireland) Order 1986 and MHA 1983; article 15 leave of absence counts as hospital detention; significant component approach rejected

Re an application by RM (a person under disability) by SM, (his father and next friend) for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland); Re an application by RM (a person under disability) by SM, (his father and next friend) for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland) No 2 [2024] UKSC 7 What are the practical implications of this case? This judgment clarifies how the rules on discharging a mentally disordered patient compulsorily detained for medical treatment operate, and how they interrelate with provisions on leave of absence. The Supreme Court’s conclusions will assist practitioners working with the Mental Health (Northern Ireland) Order 1986 (the 1986 Order), SI 1986/596, and the MeHA 1983. It confirms that, despite differing wording, the detention standard under the 1986 Order aligns with that in the MeHA 1983: the decisive threshold is necessity. Accordingly, case law on the MeHA 1983 from England and Wales can usefully guide the consideration of issues concerning detention under the 1986 Order, SI 1986/596, and vice versa. This confirms that jurisprudence from England...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Conclusions

PRACTICE NOTES
Legal due diligence reporting in share purchases: process, scope, executive summaries, 'exceptions only' approach and use of precedents

This Practice Note forms part of the Share purchase transaction collection. The reporting process Every adviser appointed to carry out due diligence ought to promptly notify their principal conclusions as they first emerge—particularly notable risks and concerns—and subsequently compile a comprehensive due diligence report drawing focused attention to any material matters identified during their detailed review. The advisers’ engagement letters should specify the agreed timetable, format and substance of the due diligence report. Preliminary or interim papers can be produced and shared at intervals during the exercise, enabling significant points to be addressed when they surface. Frequently, by the stage the definitive report is delivered to...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
A Practitioner’s Guide to Mitigation in Criminal Sentencing: Offence and Personal Factors, Article 8, Health, Character References and Plea Structure in England and Wales

Once a defendant is found guilty of a criminal offence by a court in England and Wales, the court then considers what sentence should follow. See Practice Notes: Sentencing procedure in the magistrates’ and Crown Courts and Sentencing Code. This Practice Note outlines the purpose and reach of mitigation advanced on behalf of convicted defendants in England and Wales to lessen the sentence imposed by the court... Factors determining sentence Sentencing courts must have regard to any matters that, in the court’s opinion, are relevant in mitigation of sentence. Mitigation covers any element of a case that reduces the seriousness of the sentence to be passed, whether affecting its length or its type. By contrast, aggravating factors are those that increase the severity of the sentence. Before reaching conclusions for the purpose of imposing certain sentences, the court is required to consider both aggravating and mitigating factors linked to the circumstances of the offence and any associated offence. For these purposes, the court should obtain a pre-sentence report...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Expert Evidence in International Arbitration: Party- and Tribunal-Appointed Experts, ICC/LCIA/UNCITRAL and IBA Rules, Seat Law and Practical Guidance

This Practice Note considers the framework within which expert witness evidence is presented in arbitration proceedings. An expert witness in arbitration generally fulfils a function akin to that performed in civil court cases, broadly mirroring the role seen in civil litigation. Appointed by the parties or, more rarely, by the tribunal, the expert must provide an impartial professional opinion on the issues put to them, grounded in the evidence they are given and informed by their own expertise, skill and experience. Both parties and the tribunal may test or dispute that evidence robustly, including by questioning the analysis and reasoning, by each side where relevant, and the tribunal will determine which expert it finds more persuasive or, where there is a sole expert, whether to adopt their conclusions. Although an arbitrator might be chosen for sector knowledge, this is usually to facilitate fuller comprehension of the issues in the dispute, not to turn the arbitrator into an expert who supplies and relies upon personal opinions when issuing the award....

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Precedents about Conclusions

PRECEDENTS
Annual board report template: competition law compliance systems, controls, risk assessment, reporting, training and recommendations

1 General information Report date: [ Enter date ] Previous report date: [ Enter date ] Report submitted by: [ Enter name ] 2 Action points arising from last report Action item: [ Enter action point ], Responsible person: [ Identify person responsible for this action point ], Status: [ Enter status ] Action item: [ Enter action point ], Responsible person: [ Identify person responsible for this action point ], Status: [ Enter status ] Action item: [ Enter action point ], Responsible person: [ Identify person responsible for this action point ], Status: [ Enter status ] Action item: [ Enter action point ], Responsible person: [ Identify person responsible for this action point ], Status: [ Enter status ] 3 Executive summary This report covers the following items: 3.1 overview of business operations; 3.2 account of the operation of competition law compliance systems and controls;...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Precedent will for unmarried individual without children (England and Wales): executors, chattels, legacies, residue options, administrative/STEP powers, s33 Wills Act disapplied, 10% charity gift for 36% IHT rate.

FORTHCOMING CHANGE: Potential changes to Wills Act 1837 On 16 May 2025, the Law Commission’s review of Wills published its final report, formally setting out its conclusions, with Volume II containing a draft Bill intended to supersede the Wills Act 1837. For details of these proposals, including the published draft legislation, consult Practice Note: Hot topic—modernising Wills and Modernising wills: Final Report Volume II: draft Bill for a new Wills Act. STOP PRESS: Ending the non-dom regime and moving to a residence-based IHT regime. The Finance Act 2025 (FA 2025), which obtained Royal Assent on 20 March 2025, enacts legislation for the removal of the remittance basis of taxation and substitutes a residence-based system commencing on 6 April 2025. It also displaces domicile as the principal determinant of inheritance tax (IHT) liability for individuals. Further measures cover revisions to the rules for excluded property status, the removal of protected settlements status for offshore trusts, and alterations to overseas workday relief as applicable. For more on these reforms, see...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Law firm fee income forecasting template: gut feel, trend analysis, capacity, WIP, bottom-up and client demand

A: Gut feel Comments or observations Instinctive income forecast B: Trends Data Year Fee income £ % uplift on prior year Indicators that the % change is not part of the wider trend [ 2025 ] [ 2024 ] [ 2023 ] [ 2022 ] [ 2021 ] Conclusions Comments or observations Trend analysis fee income prediction C: Capacity No. of fee earners Expected chargeable hours per fee earner Average hourly rate Expected gross income % of recorded time billed in previous years Capacity income prediction D: WIP (work in progress) levels Data Value of WIP at year end [ 2024 ] Value of WIP at year end [ 2025 ] Number of open files at year end [ 2024 ] Number of open files at year...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Q&As about Conclusions

Q&As
Former lease dilapidations after TAW and contracted-out lease

This Q&A relates to whether the landlord can serve a schedule of dilapidations in respect of partitioning. It considers if the presence of partitioning permits the landlord to issue a schedule of dilapidations. It also addresses whether the existence of partitions could adversely affect the tenant’s ability to determine the lease by exercising a break; that latter point is not dealt with in this reply. For the purposes of this Q&A, it is assumed that the tenant, with the landlord’s authorisation, installed the partitions during the term of the earlier lease (the Original Lease), and that, when negotiating the new contracted out lease (the Current Lease), the partitions were not raised. In evaluating the tenant’s responsibilities to remove the partitions, this answer is necessarily constrained without sight of the leases and any relevant licences granted in connection with the works. The appropriate starting point is to review the repairing, reinstatement and yielding up obligations contained in both the Current Lease and the Original Lease to ascertain what duties rest...

Read More Right Arrow