Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
Glossary detail
CASE STUDY

“We have to become more agile as our clients' expectations and requirements change. The only thing we know is that tomorrow is going to be different and we must be prepared. With LexisNexis, I feel more confident of that we're ready every time.”

Wolverhampton County Council

Access all documents on Condescendence

Condescendence meaning

Published by a LexisNexis Family expert
What does Condescendence mean?
In Scottish civil litigation, the condescendence is the part of a pursuer’s summons (Court of Session) or initial writ (Sheriff Court) that narrates, in numbered articles, the factual averments supporting the remedies sought. It sets out the who, what, when and where of the claim; the legal propositions are then stated separately as the pleas‑in‑law. It is a procedural pleading concept recognised in the Court of Session Rules and Sheriff Court Rules rather than defined in statute. The defender’s defences answer each article of condescendence, admitting, denying or explaining the averments. Key features and practice points: - Must be relevant, specific and properly particularised; inadequately specified averments risk exclusion from probation or dismissal on relevancy. - Should align with any supporting documents and any schedule of damages. - Forms the basis for proof, debates on relevancy and case management. Jurisdictional note: The term is specific to Scots law. The closest functional equivalents are particulars of claim (England & Wales and Northern Ireland) and a statement/particulars of claim in Ireland. Usage and purpose are broadly comparable, but the terminology and pleading structure differ.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Practice Notes about Condescendence

PRACTICE NOTES
Written Pleadings in Scottish Civil Actions: Who May Draft, Structure, Craves, Averments, Pleas-in-Law, Defences and Preliminary Pleas

This Practice Note is concerned with the preparation of written pleadings in civil actions in Scotland. In Scotland, as in other legal systems, a party seeking to advance or oppose a civil claim must first reduce that claim or defence to writing. Such written statements make up the pleadings, and are often referred to as ‘writs’. There is no single, standardised form of pleadings used in every Scottish court. For historical reasons, the titles and formats of writs vary according to the court seized and the remedy pursued. Typical examples are: summons in the Court of Session—RCS, Ch 13 defences in the Court of Session—RCS, Ch 18 petitions in the Court of Session—RCS, Ch 14 initial writ under the Ordinary Cause Rules in the sheriff court—OCR, Rule 3.1 defences in the sheriff court—OCR, Rule 9.6 initial writs under the Summary Application rules in the sheriff court—SAR, Ch 2.4 counterclaims—RCS, Ch 25; OCR, Ch 19 pleadings in appeals—RCS, Chs 39–41;...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Proving the tenor of a lost will or codicil in Scotland: practical guidance on Sheriff Court jurisdiction, parties, crave and condescendence, with example pleadings and special casus amissionis

This How to complete an action for proving the tenor of a lost Will or codicil guide has been produced in partnership with Fergus Colquhoun of Terra Firma Chambers. It offers a worked example of an action to establish the tenor of a lost codicil in Scotland. It also sets out guidance on the degree of narrative and specification that ought to be included within the action. It is intended to be read in conjunction with Precedent: Style for action for proving the tenor of lost Will—Scotland. Example of completed action The fully completed example action can be accessed here in full as a reference: Choice of Sheriff Court The appropriate Sheriff Court is the competent court with jurisdiction over the locality in which the deceased was domiciled on the date of death. Who to identify as the Pursuer Anyone with a relevant interest may raise the proceedings, although in practice it will most commonly be the executor, or the individual entitled to be...

Read More Right Arrow