Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
Glossary detail
CASE STUDY

“A lot of the work that I do is historic-the maximum sentences change at different points of time. It's really complicated and people get it wrong all the time. That's when having a timeline is really useful.”

1 High Pavement

Access all documents on Conditions for Acceptance

Conditions for Acceptance meaning

Published by a LexisNexis Energy expert
What does Conditions for Acceptance mean?
Conditions for Acceptance describes the operator-set requirements that a receiving body (such as a landfill, incinerator, materials recovery facility, composting/AD plant or wastewater treatment works) applies to the parameters with which a material must comply before it will be accepted into the facility. The phrase is descriptive rather than a defined statutory term, but the conditions are typically aligned with, and constrained by, the facility’s environmental permit or licence and relevant law (for example, waste acceptance criteria for landfill and trade effluent consents). Typical features include specification parameters (composition, contamination thresholds, hazardous properties, particle size, moisture, calorific value, odour), packaging/container type, pre-acceptance information, testing and sampling, material classification (LoW/EWC codes), and required documentation (waste transfer or consignment notes, certificates, booking references) together with site rules and delivery protocols. Usage is broadly consistent across England and Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland, with differences arising from regulator terminology and permitting/licensing regimes. These conditions are routinely embedded in contracts, tenders and service-level agreements. Non-compliance can lead to rejection, quarantine, surcharges, reports to regulators and contractual liabilities for costs, delays and remediation, as well as potential permit non-compliance by the operator.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Checklists about Conditions for Acceptance

CHECKLISTS
Software development agreements: drafting checklist covering deliverables, specifications, agile development, IP ownership and licensing, pricing, acceptance testing, service levels, liability, termination, governing law/jurisdiction and execution

How to use this Checklist This Checklist outlines the principal clauses to cover when preparing a software development contract. For deeper commentary on matters mentioned here, consult Practice Note: System development and systems integration agreements and Precedent: Software development agreement. Targeted topics are also addressed in Practice Notes: Software development agreements—fees, expenses and disbursements and Software development—agile method. The Checklist may likewise support the preparation of a brief, non-binding heads of terms; for guidance, see Precedent: Heads of terms—commercial contracts. Use the third column to capture notes or remarks as you progress through the Checklist as it is worked through. Headings include Checklist, Further information and Notes (if any). Checklist Further information Notes (if any) Parties Confirm each party’s legal form and whether any third parties (for example, group affiliates) are intended to benefit under the proposed contract. See Precedent: Parties clause. Confirm whether any third party will underwrite performance or financial obligations. Commencement and duration ...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related News about Conditions for Acceptance

NEWS
Paris Court of Appeal (France) confirms broker-issued conditions particulières (CAIP) override Liprobel 7/Fegra arbitration clause; arbitral jurisdiction upheld (Soyl v AXA/Novial)

What are the practical implications of this case? This ruling has significant consequences for practitioners involved in international sales, commodity trading and arbitration. The Court of Appeal held that, when several arbitration clauses appear across different layers of contractual paperwork, the clause contained in the conditions particulières—in this instance, the broker’s pre-printed CAIP wording—takes priority over any arbitration clause found in incorporated industry-standard terms, as it serves as an express contrary agreement to those general conditions. The Paris Court of Appeal reiterates a fundamental principle of French international arbitration: the parties’ shared intention governs, identified through objective indicators of consent, including consistent acceptance and execution of broker-issued confirmations. On procedure, the decision shows that French courts apply a stringent review of jurisdiction under Article 1520(1) CPC, while consciously avoiding any reconsideration of the merits. It further clarifies that mere references to commonly used trade terms (such as Liprobel 7) do not, on their own, transform those terms into conditions particulières where the essential commercial terms and the arbitration agreement...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
UK and EU competition round-up: CMA PTTSBE guidance, CAT rejects Kent v Apple extension, new subsidy Streamlined Routes, ABF/Hovis fast-track, Commission FSR guidelines, DMA review feedback

In this issue: UK antitrust UK private actions UK subsidy control UK mergers EU Foreign Subsidies Regulation EU Digital Markets Act Daily and weekly news alerts LexTalk®Competition: a Lexis®Nexis community Caselex UK antitrust CMA releases revised guidance on the Public Transport Ticketing Schemes Block Exemption The CMA has issued updated guidance on the Public Transport Ticketing Schemes Block Exemption (PTTSBE), capturing changes made by the Competition Act 1998 (Public Transport Ticketing Schemes Block Exemption) (Amendment) Order 2025, following the CMA’s review and the Secretary of State’s acceptance of its recommendations. Background The PTTSBE removes certain integrated ticketing schemes from the scope of the Chapter I prohibition under the Competition Act 1998. Extended in 2016 for a further ten years, it was scheduled to end on 28 February 2026. In January 2025, the CMA proposed eliminating the sunset clause and broadening the meaning of ‘connecting service’ to cover trunk bus services. These proposals...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Arbitration weekly highlights: case law, ICSID/IIA trends, AI guidance, sanctions, sports arbitration and sector updates—4 September 2025

In this issue Arbitration in England & Wales International arbitration Investment treaty arbitration Institutional and ad hoc arbitration Sector- and industry-specific arbitration Other arbitration and ADR-related news and developments LexTalk®Arbitration: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Useful information Arbitration in England & Wales Freezing order discharged due to failure to serve arbitration claim form At the return hearing for a without-notice worldwide freezing order (WWFO) in AAA v BBB (a company incorporated and registered in Curaçao) [2025] EWHC 1647 (Comm), High Court examined the effect of the service period for the arbitration claim form having expired before the WWFO was granted. The court concluded claimant had not taken all reasonable measures to serve the claim form within the one‑month deadline. As a result, the conditions for granting a retrospective extension of time for service were not satisfied. Accordingly, the WWFO was discharged by the court on the...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Conditions for Acceptance

PRACTICE NOTES
Judicial Tenders in Scottish Civil Litigation: Drafting, Lodging, Withdrawal and Acceptance, and the Expenses, Interest and CRU Implications

Civil justice reform: Consult our Practice Note, Civil justice reform in Scotland—virtual hearings and electronic submission of documents, for advice on the present rules and procedures of the Scottish civil courts regarding remote hearings and the digital signing, sending and lodging of documents. The Practice Note also addresses the approach to making and/or answering a judicial tender in proceedings involving a single pursuer and a single defender in Scotland today...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
IChemE Burgundy Book 2nd Edition: target cost process plant contracts; key provisions on cost control, pain/gain sharing, testing, insurance, termination, liability caps, payment and disputes, with 2025 AI guidance

This practice note addresses the 2nd Edition of the Burgundy Book, released in 2013, with particular emphasis on its role as a target cost form. In line with all IChemE agreements, the Burgundy Book contains thorough requirements for testing at completion and for commissioning, making it especially well suited to process engineering sectors such as nuclear, water, petrochemicals, and food. The suite adopts an almost entirely uniform structure across clauses, presentation and schedules. Departure from the standard drafting occurs only where needed to set out the mechanism delivering the risk/reward regime—in this instance, remuneration on a target cost footing. See also Practice Notes: IChemE Conditions 5th Edition—‘Red Book’ and IChemE Conditions ‘Green Book’ 4th Edition. Nature of Target Cost Contracts Target cost denotes that the contractor receives payment of the ‘actual cost’ it incurs (as defined), akin to a reimbursable arrangement but constrained by an agreed target cost. Where the actual cost surpasses the target, any additional sum payable to the contractor is reduced—often to nil. If the...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Discharge of Contractual Obligations under English Law: Performance, Substantial Performance, Time of the Essence; Actual and Anticipatory Breach, Conditions, Warranties and Innominate Terms, Election, Affirmation, Termination Risks and Variation

Introduction This Practice Note forms part of our LLB Contract Law series, carefully tailored with law students in mind. It examines the doctrine governing the discharge of obligations, with particular attention to discharge by performance and by breach, setting these within the wider context of contractual termination. It considers the thresholds for valid performance, such as strict compliance, substantial performance, entire versus divisible obligations, and the importance of time clauses where relevant. It then assesses breach of contract in its forms (actual and anticipatory) and identifies when breach is grave enough to justify termination by the innocent party, with close treatment of conditions, warranties, and innominate terms. The Practice Note also tackles the doctrine of election, the perils of wrongful termination, and the effects of acceptance in sale of goods contracts. Throughout, it weaves in leading authorities and statutory rules to show how the law mediates certainty with fairness. By blending doctrinal exposition with judicial reasoning and critical perspective, the Practice Note aims to equip students with the analytical...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Precedents about Conditions for Acceptance

PRECEDENTS
Precedent conditions and further terms for a UK Takeover Code public offer (Appendix 1A)

APPENDIX [ 1 ]—Conditions and further terms of the Offer Part A 1 Conditions The Offer is subject to the following conditions: 1.1 Acceptance condition receipt of valid acceptances (and such acceptances not being validly withdrawn in accordance with the rules and requirements of the Code and the terms of the Offer) by no later than 1.00 pm (London time) on the Unconditional Date (or at such other time(s) and/or date(s) as [ Offeror ] may, subject to the rules of the Code or with the consent of the Panel, determine) in respect of Shares which, together with all other Shares acquired by [ Offeror ] (whether pursuant to the Offer or otherwise), carry not less than [ 90 ] per cent. (or such lower percentage as [ Offeror ] may decide) of the nominal value of the Shares to which the Offer relates and of the voting rights attached to those Shares, provided that (a) this Condition shall not be met unless [ Offeror...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Pro-customer B2B Purchase Terms and Conditions for Goods and Services: stringent acceptance, warranties, IPR assignment, indemnities and compliance (bribery, slavery, tax evasion, fraud) — England and Wales law

1 Definitions and interpretation These Conditions define key terms and set the rules for reading the Contract. Defined expressions include (among others) Acceptance Conditions, Adequate Procedures, Affiliate, Applicable Law, Associated With, BA 2010, Bribery Laws, Business Day, CFA 2017, Conditions, Confidential Information, Contract, Control, ECCTA 2023, Force Majeure, Foreign Tax Evasion Offence, Fraud Offence, Goods, Intellectual Property Rights, IPR Claim, Location, MSA 2015, MSA Offence, Order, Prevention Procedures, Price, Services, Specification, Supplier, Supplier Associated Person, Supplier Personnel, UK Tax Evasion Offence and VAT. References to the Contract include these Conditions, the Order and any schedules, appendices and annexes. Headings are for convenience only and do not affect interpretation. “Party” means the Supplier or the Customer and includes successors and permitted assigns; “person” includes natural and corporate bodies; “company” covers any body corporate. Gender includes all genders; singular includes plural and vice versa. Terms such as “including” and similar are illustrative and not limiting. “Writing” or “written” covers legible, non‑transitory forms. ...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Archived precedent: Rule 17.1 level of acceptances and extension of offer announcement under the Takeover Code (pre‑July 2021)

This Precedent has been archived and not maintained since the Takeover Code (Code)’s revision in July 2021. This precedent is no longer updated following the July 2021 revision of the Takeover Code (the Code). It related to circumstances in which an offeror disclosed the level of acceptances of an offer under Rule 17.1 of the Code where the offer had been extended. Before the July 2021 changes, the Code enabled an offeror to set successive closing dates to assess whether the acceptance condition had been met. If, on a closing date, that condition was not satisfied, the offeror could either allow the offer to lapse or continue it by specifying a new closing date. The Code has now removed the concept of closing dates; instead, all offer conditions must be satisfied by Day 60. Not for release, publication or distribution (in whole or in part, directly or indirectly) in, into or from any jurisdiction where to do so would constitute a violation of the relevant laws or regulations of...

Read More Right Arrow