Continued meaning

This Checklist outlines the key questions to consider when determining: which legal system governs a contract of employment or employment relationship (applicable law) whose courts and/or tribunals are competent to hear an employment case (jurisdiction) how the courts and employment tribunals assess what statutory rights, if any, are held by an employee who works abroad and/or has a foreign employer (territorial application or scope of statutory employment rights) Brexit impact From exit day (31 January 2020) the UK ceased to be an EU Member State. Under the Withdrawal Agreement’s transitional arrangements, there was an implementation period up to 11pm on 31 December 2020, referred to as ‘IP completion day’. Throughout that period, the EU continued to treat the UK as a Member State for many purposes. Although the UK could not participate in the EU’s political institutions and governance structures, it was required to comply with its obligations under EU law (including EU treaties, legislation, principles and international agreements) and to...

The circumstances in which an incumbent office-holder needs to resign from their appointment are: ill-health retiring as, or stopping practice as, a licensed insolvency practitioner (IP) a conflict of interest, or a shift in personal circumstances, that prevents or renders impracticable the continued performance of duties Examples include curtailment or withdrawal of the IP’s licence to act, the IP changing firm with appointments not transferring, or alternative arrangements being put in place for those appointments. This Checklist should be read alongside the Checklist on the block transfer of office-holder appointments: Procedure for block transfers of office-holder appointments—checklist, as a block transfer order can often be the speediest and most economical means of addressing the situation. Further guidance appears in the Practice Note: Block transfer orders—the law and practice. An office-holder can also be displaced by creditors, which may need to be factored in. For more detail, see: Removal of an office-holder—checklist. While the various insolvency regimes share broadly...

The moratorium in administration Central to administration, the moratorium operates as the principal device that enables a company rescue, a restructuring, or the disposal of the business. Its objective is to afford the company and its administrator a period of breathing space to shape and carry out proposals, and to scrutinise the position of the company, its business and its assets. That pause creates room for careful assessment and orderly planning. The consequence of the moratorium (and any interim moratorium) is that proceedings, enforcement and other steps cannot be taken against the company or its property while it remains in force. Claims or actions may only be commenced or continued with the administrator’s consent or the court’s permission. For further detail on the moratorium and its impact, refer to Practice Note: The moratorium in administration. The process of applying to lift the moratorium Before issuing any application requesting the court’s permission to lift the stay, the applicant should first seek the administrator’s agreement. The administrator may consent,...

In this issue: Public company takeovers Equity capital markets Corporate governance Partnerships Private equity Members LexTalk®Corporate: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Useful information Public company takeovers Takeover Panel publishes note on cancellation of admission to trading The Takeover Panel (Panel) has issued a new note offering advisers guidance on cancelling an admission to trading for companies caught by the Takeover Code (Code). It confirms that companies with registered offices in the UK, the Channel Islands or the Isle of Man, whose securities are traded on specified markets, remain within the Code for two years after cancellation, irrespective of where central management and control is located or whether they re-register as private companies. The Panel encourages early engagement with the Panel Executive when a cancellation is contemplated, to ensure shareholders receive suitable disclosure about the Code’s continued effect, and it outlines...

Ruling 5-2 By a 5–2 vote, the Court of Appeals determined that claimant Emily Wu is subject to Uber’s arbitration provision because she assented to the company’s revised terms of use on her mobile in January 2021. The panel said it was immaterial that, by then, she had already commenced proceedings against the company. Consequently, an arbitrator must consider Wu’s contention that the January 2021 terms were ‘actively misleading’, as they suggested the arbitration pact would apply solely to prospective claims against the company, according to the opinion. ‘For as long as written contracts have existed, parties have agreed to them without first scrutinising their terms,’ the panel observed. ‘Such omission can carry legal ramifications, whether the party is a sophisticated business or an everyday customer, and whether the contract is set out on paper or via an electronic pop-up.’ ‘Here, the upshot of the claimant’s purported failure to closely review Uber’s updated terms of use is that she must present her arguments about Uber’s allegedly deceptive and unconscionable...

A v N (R intervening) [2025] EWFC 371 (B) What was the background? The applicant wife (W) and the respondent husband (H) wed in March 1996 after living together for two years, amounting to a near three-decade marriage when the cohabitation is counted. The intervenor was W’s mother (R). The parties had five children; only the youngest, T, now aged 15, remains under 18, although several of the older children have continued to reside in the family property. The former matrimonial home (FMH) was acquired on 13 February 2012 in H and W’s joint names. It was accepted by both that the purchase would not have been possible without funds from R, and that from the outset the plan was for R to share the FMH with them. The completion statement recorded a £130,000 contribution from R towards the £881,161 price, described as a ‘mother gifted deposit’. The chosen property was specifically selected so that semi-independent accommodation could be constructed for R’s eventual occupation, identified in the judgment as...

ARCHIVED: This archived Practice Note is not being maintained. Today, most global businesses work with third parties, tapping into vital capabilities that help them operate across markets. Yet those relationships can also carry significant corruption exposure, potentially resulting in breaches of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). With the right diligence, tailored contractual terms, targeted training, and robust oversight, organisations can manage FCPA risk while still benefiting from third-party contributions to their operations. The FCPA bars corrupt payments made through intermediaries when a company is ‘knowing’ that some or all of the money will be passed to a foreign government official. It is not necessary to have actual knowledge of a third party’s conduct; wilful blindness can be enough to attribute knowledge. In practice, businesses cannot look the other way or disregard indications of possible bribery by those they engage. Agents, distributors, consultants, contractors, and subcontractors Service-providers, suppliers, and other non-intermediary third parties Effective third-party engagement should include anti-corruption due diligence,...

Why are construction products regulated? Construction products are regulated to: confirm that any item entering the market meets all legal obligations, and build trust among consumers, public authorities and manufacturers regarding product conformity What sort of products are affected? ‘Construction product’ means any product or kit manufactured and placed on the market for permanent incorporation in construction works, or their parts, where its performance affects how those works satisfy the basic requirements. This includes items such as doors, windows, shutters and gates, membranes, thermal insulation, chimneys and flues, sanitary appliances, fire alarms, flooring, fire-retardant products, space heating appliances, power cables, glass, fixings, and many others. Key definitions Placing on the market ‘Placing on the market’ is the first time a construction product is made available on the GB market, as described in UK government guidance. Making available on the market ‘Making available on the market’ means any supply of a construction product for distribution or use...

Premier Oil is among a number of oil and gas companies that have reassessed their funding options to cope with the effects of an extended period of low crude prices. Brexit impact From exit day (31 January 2020), the UK ceased to be an EU Member State. Nevertheless, under the Withdrawal Agreement, the UK entered an implementation period, during which EU law continued to apply. In many Brexit SIs, references to exit day should be construed as referring to IP completion day (the end of the implementation period, defined in clause 39 as 31 December 2020 at 11.00 pm), unless that wording is expressly disapplied by the relevant SI. For more detail, see News Analysis: Brexit—impact of the Withdrawal Agreement and European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 2020 for R&I lawyers, and Brexit Bulletin—key updates, research tips and resources. While schemes do not fall within the scope of the Recast Regulation on Insolvency, their later recognition frequently depends on Brussels I (recast) (see below and Practice Note: Brexit—impact on...

Ordinary resolution [ That the clause within the service contract proposed to be concluded between the Company and [ insert name of director ] stipulating that the period during which their employment [ [ shall continue OR could be continued ] otherwise than at the...

This Deed This Deed is entered into on [ insert date ] by the parties identified below. Parties The individuals whose full names and addresses are set out in the Schedule (each a Partner and, collectively, the Partners) [ Insert name of COFA ] of [ insert address ] (the COFA) BACKGROUND (A) The Partners carry on business as a legal practice authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) under the name of [ insert name of firm ] (the Firm). (B) The Partners have appointed [ insert name of COFA ] as the Firm’s compliance officer for finance and administration (COFA), subject to [ continued ] approval by the SRA. (C) The parties have agreed that the COFA shall have the benefit of an indemnity from the Partners in relation to certain liabilities of the COFA, as more fully set out in this deed. THIS DEED PROVIDES: COFA’s regulatory...

In the County Court at [ insert ], under Claim No: [ insert claim number ], between A B as Claimant and X Y as Defendant PARTICULARS OF CLAIM At every relevant time, the Claimant owned and was driving a [ insert make and model of vehicle ], bearing registration [ insert registration number ]. The Defendant likewise was the owner and driver of a [ insert make and model of vehicle ], registration mark [ insert registration number ]. On [ insert date ], the Claimant was lawfully travelling along [ insert street name, town, county ]. Whilst the Claimant continued on that route, the Defendant’s vehicle, approaching from the opposite direction in the other lane, sought to pass a stationary car in that lane and moved across into the Claimant’s lane...

In this Q&A, we assume that B’s claim is smaller than A’s. Legal process against the company Under paragraph 43(2) of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986), the moratorium prevents any legal process—covering legal proceedings, execution, distress and diligence—from being started or continued against the company or its property without the administrator’s consent or the court’s permission. This wording is wide enough to encompass any remaining actions or steps that might otherwise be taken against the company or its property. Accordingly, B can only bring an action against A with the approval of the administrator or the leave of the court. The purpose of the moratorium (and the interim moratorium) is to safeguard the company and its assets from creditor action during the company’s administration and the pre-appointment period. It bars any steps, actions or processes from being begun or carried on against the company and its property, save with the administrator’s consent (if one is appointed) or the court’s permission. See Practice...

When the fixed term of an assured tenancy (including an assured shorthold tenancy) ends and the tenant remains in occupation, a statutory periodic tenancy arises under section 5(2) of the Housing Act 1988. To end that statutory periodic tenancy, the landlord may proceed using either the section 8 or section 21 route. The section 21 option is usually preferable, as no grounds need to be proven, unless the landlord cannot meet the pre-conditions for serving a section 21 notice. In those circumstances, a section 8 notice can be used, provided the landlord can rely on one of the specified grounds. For fuller guidance, see Practice Note: Assured and assured shorthold tenancies—terminating, particularly the sections ‘Method of landlord termination’, ‘Section 8’ and ‘Section 21—pre-conditions to service’...

Disability discrimination Under section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) and EqA 2010, Sch 1, Pt 1, a diagnosis of cancer is treated, without further proof, as a disability for EqA 2010 purposes. See Practice Note: Disability. Attention must be given to the various forms of discrimination and other banned conduct contained in EqA 2010, as set out within that legislation and provisions therein. See the part of Practice Note: Disability discrimination headed ‘The basic types of discrimination and other prohibited conduct’, together with the fuller Practice Notes cited there and cross-referred within that section. For EqA 2010 purposes, a ‘dismissal’ also covers situations where an employee’s employment ends (and is not immediately renewed on identical terms) because a particular period has run out, or a particular event has happened, or a particular circumstance has arisen; this includes the ending of fixed-term contracts (EqA 2010, s 39(7)–(8)). Accordingly, the requirement to make reasonable adjustments binds employers when they are considering dismissing an employee; that is, dismissal will...