Copyright Tribunal meaning

In this issue: Horizon scanning Recruitment Public sector Pay Tax Protected characteristics Equality of terms (equal pay) Whistleblowing Employee duties and restrictions on competition Unfair dismissal Employment Tribunals Dates for your diary Trackers New Q&As Employment resources on Lexis+® LexTalk®Employment: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts Horizon scanning Government U-turns on day-one unfair dismissal rights and announces compensation cap ‘will be lifted’ On 27 November 2025, the Department for Business and Trade (DBT) confirmed that, following a round of ‘constructive conversations’ with trade unions and business representatives, the discussions settled on a ‘workable package’: shortening the unfair dismissal qualifying period from two years to six months, while preserving existing day-one protection against discrimination and for automatically unfair reasons for dismissal. To reinforce these safeguards, the government further pledged that any alteration to the unfair dismissal qualifying period will only be possible through primary legislation,...

In this issue: Information technology Internet Media Advertising, marketing and sponsorship Reputation management Telecommunications LexTalk®TMT: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Useful information Information technology Commission consults on draft Guidance on EU Cyber Resilience Act The European Commission has opened a consultation on a draft Communication offering direction on how to interpret and apply in practice Regulation (EU) 2024/2847, the EU Cyber Resilience Act (EU CRA). In line with Article 26(1) EU CRA, this non-binding guidance seeks to support manufacturers, developers and other stakeholders in understanding their obligations and fostering a harmonised approach across the EU, with a particular emphasis on helping microenterprises and small and medium-sized enterprises meet compliance needs. the scope of the EU CRA, including free and open-source software and what constitutes a substantial modification; support period obligations; designation of important and...

In this issue: Copyright & associated rights Trade marks/passing off Patents IP and AI LexTalk®IP: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Useful information Copyright & associated rights UK music collective succeeds in stopping mass claim over ‘black box’ royalties. MLex: Judges at the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) have decided that a planned mass claim accusing a UK music copyright collective of unfairly distributing royalty income cannot proceed to trial. David Rowntree, Blur’s drummer, had sought compensation from the Performing Rights Society (PRS) on behalf of thousands of songwriters concerning ‘black box’ royalties—funds that cannot be matched and paid to the correct artist. See: UK music collective wins action to halt mass claim over ‘black box’ royalties. Trade marks/passing off The trade mark licensing ‘black hole’ (Lifestyle Equities v Sportsdirect). This decision will interest trade mark lawyers who advise clients on and...

Film and TV glossary A–B Film and TV glossary E–H Film and TV glossary I–L Film and TV glossary M–P Film and TV glossary R–S Film and TV glossary T–W CAP Code for non-broadcast media The UK Code of Non-broadcast Advertising and Direct & Promotional Marketing (the CAP Code) serves as the principal framework governing non-broadcast adverts, promotional sales activity and direct marketing messages. It is drafted by the Committee on Advertising Practice (CAP), a self-regulatory body whose membership comprises organisations representing advertising, sales promotion, direct marketing and media industries. The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) polices the CAP Code and may require the withdrawal or amendment of any advertisement that contravenes these standards. Refer to Practice Note: Advertising law and regulation. Channel 4 Channel 4 operates as a ‘publisher-broadcaster’: it produces no programmes internally, commissioning content from production companies across the UK. Cinematograph film Under the Copyright Act 1956 (CA 1956), films gained protection as...

The purpose of the Copyright Tribunal The Copyright Tribunal (the Tribunal) is a standalone adjudicatory body created under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (CDPA 1988). It exists to settle commercial licensing disputes between copyright holders or their agents and commercial users of protected material. The Tribunal sets the terms and conditions for collective copyright licensing schemes administered by licensing bodies, and also rules on disagreements concerning the terms of individual licences offered by those bodies. Under CDPA 1988, s 116(1), a licensing scheme means a scheme that specifies the classes of case in which the operator of the scheme, or the person on whose behalf he acts, is prepared to grant copyright licences, and the terms on which licences would be granted in those classes of case. The Tribunal does not hear claims for copyright infringement. Such claims are ordinarily handled by the civil courts. In most instances, collective licensing will typically fall within the scope of a licensing scheme...

ARCHIVED: This archived Practice Note sets out key dispute resolution (DR) appeals or notable appellate court rulings in the sphere of general civil litigation in England and Wales from 2023 to the present, and highlights significant pending appeal matters (to support horizon scanning) alongside reported decisions handed down by the Supreme Court, Court of Appeal, Competition Appeal Tribunal, Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (the Privy Council), Court of Justice of the European Union (Court of Justice) and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). Links are provided to each judgment and any bespoke News Analysis to aid comprehension of the principles addressed in the decisions and the impact of those rulings. This Practice Note comprises two elements designed to help dispute resolution practitioners stay current with developments in case law that affect their practice area, or that bear upon civil litigation procedure more generally: selected forthcoming appeals to the Supreme Court are listed below; see Dispute resolution: key appeal cases—2023—Key forthcoming appeals to the Supreme...