counsel meaning

A meeting with your line manager on your first day Setting up a meeting with your line manager on day one of your new role is strongly advisable. Although it will most likely be an initial ‘getting to know you’ chat, there are several questions you can raise to help you feel more at ease in the position. If you are the only in-house lawyer or leading an internal legal team, your line manager will typically be the CEO or Finance Director, though it could be any other director. If you are joining an existing team, your line manager may sit in a legal, regulatory or compliance function, for example: Company Secretary General Counsel Senior Solicitor Legal Director Compliance Director Alternatively, they may hold a non-legal post, such as Finance Director or CEO. In a larger team with multiple layers in the reporting structure, your line manager could be someone else within that hierarchy. This Checklist highlights the key...

This Checklist Produced together with both Josephine Howe, partner, and Grace Gao, counsel, at Ogier, this checklist was created...

STOP PRESS: The UK’s prospectus framework presently derives from the EU Prospectus Regulation, preserved in domestic law following Brexit as the UK Prospectus Regulation. The government has been reassessing this regime within a broader programme to modernise UK capital markets and make the UK a more appealing place to list. In this context, the UK Prospectus Regulation will give way to the Public Offers and Admission to Trading Regulations 2024 (the POATRs), and all detailed requirements connected to admission to trading will sit within Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) admission rules. The FCA issued its final rules (PS25/9) on 15 July 2025, with implementation expected on 19 January 2026. These changes form part of efforts to reform the capital markets in the UK and enhance the attractiveness of the UK as a listing venue. For more detail on the principal features of the POATRs framework pertinent to the debt capital markets, see Practice Note: The UK Prospectus Regulation—essentials [Archived] — Reform of the UK prospectus regime. Note that numerous steps...

Motor Insurers Bureau v Houston [2025] EWHC 3178 (KB) What are the practical implications of this case? Although the outcome may catch seasoned credit hire practitioners off guard, it was driven in large part by the precise language of the debarring order in this case. The order confined any future debarring strictly to the question of rate and made no reference to reliance on impecuniosity for the hire period or for any wider purposes; appellant counsel on appeal suggested this flowed from a legacy version of a standard form. Practitioners familiar with credit hire litigation will know that, more often than not, directions orders bar a claimant from reliance on impecuniosity for all purposes following a failure to provide financial disclosure. Even so, the judgment is a clear reminder that the courts will apply the ordinary and natural meaning to the words of any order, and practitioners should take care to verify the exact wording of a debarring order in every case. That is not, however, to suggest the...

Oswin v Otila; and Ondray Claim No ARB 032/2025 What was the background? This matter arose from a falling-out between Oswin (the Claimant) and Ondray (the Second Defendant) over how to run their joint venture company, Otila (the First Defendant). Oswin owned 49% of the First Defendant’s shares and Ondray 51%. The board could act only by unanimous vote, while shareholder resolutions required a 75% super-majority. When they were unable to agree on management and operations, the company became deadlocked. Their relationship was governed by a Joint Venture Agreement (JVA) dated 12 March 2019, which included an arbitration clause calling for DIFC-seated proceedings under the DIFC-LCIA Rules. The Claimant also operated a medical and hazardous waste facility under an Operations and Management Agreement due to expire on 21 August 2025. On 15 August 2025, the Claimant issued a Dispute Notice under clause 21.2 of the JVA, alleging that the Second Defendant was assuming strategic decision-making without proper authority—covering directions on renewal of the O&M Agreement, instruction of external...

In this issue: Cross border criminal investigations Criminal procedure and evidence Proceeds of crime Bribery, corruption, sanctions and export controls Cybercrime and data protection offences Environmental offences Financial services and pensions offences Fraud, forgery, tax and theft offences Insolvency Local authority prosecutions Money laundering Corporate Crime in Scotland Other corporate crime and crime related news Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Useful information Cross border criminal investigations Companies should act as corporate enforcement develops. In late June 2025, SFO Director Nick Ephgrave met with Matthew Galeotti, head of the criminal division at the US Department of Justice (DOJ), and both reiterated a pledge to work together on prominent transnational investigations. Hayley Lund, partner, and Frankie Cowl, counsel, at Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, consider the UK’s shifting corporate enforcement landscape. See News Analysis: Companies must take action as...

This Practice Note has been prepared in collaboration with Ms Koh Swee Yen, Senior Counsel and Partner, Mr Joel Quek, Partner, Ms Magdalene Ong, Partner, Ms Divya Harchandani, Foreign Lawyer, and Ms Thea Elyssa Vega, Foreign Lawyer, all from WongPartnership LLP, Singapore. The seventh edition of the SIAC Rules took effect on 1 January 2025 and can be accessed here. This note addresses how to initiate arbitration under the Arbitration Rules of the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) (7th edition) 2025 (the 2025 SIAC Rules). Please note that Singapore judgments mentioned in this Practice Note are not reported by LexisNexis® UK. Prior to commencing an arbitration Before beginning an arbitration, there must be a ‘dispute’ that is capable of referral to arbitration. At the outset, assess whether an arbitration agreement exists and whether there is a ‘dispute’ that may properly be referred to arbitration. Consider as well any additional jurisdictional objections a respondent might advance. The following matters should be reviewed prior to starting any arbitration (among others):...

A glossary of frequently used terms and phrases in Scottish Private Client law, with the closest England and Wales equivalents (where applicable) and links to helpful websites Ab intestato Meaning From someone who dies without a will; describes property taken under the laws of intestate succession. Nearest English equivalent None Action of specific implement Meaning A court action seeking an order compelling a party to carry out a particular act. In Scotland there is no division between equitable and legal remedies, unlike England and Wales. Nearest English equivalent Specific performance (an equitable remedy for breach of contract that can be ordered alongside, or in place of, damages) Advance notice Meaning An entry in the relevant property register that protects the grantee of a deed intended for registration in the Land Register of Scotland. The protected period of 35 days begins on the day after registration....

Dobbies Garden Centres Limited sought a Part 26A restructuring plan at a convening hearing in October 2024 and a sanction hearing in December 2024 before the Scottish Outer House, Court of Session. The key headline points are set out below (capitalised terms not defined here have the meanings given in the sanction judgment). This Deal Debrief forms part of our Restructuring plans collection. For an in‑depth analysis of key metrics from RPs filed in England & Wales in 2023, together with commentary from leading figures in the restructuring sphere, see Practice Note: Market Insights Trend Report—trends in Part 26A restructuring plans in 2023 [Archived]. Name of plan company Dobbies Garden Centres Limited (the Company) Industry sector Garden centres Place of debtor’s incorporation and jurisdictional factors The Company was incorporated in Scotland and its centre of main interests (COMI) was in Scotland. Legal counsel involved The Company: Almira Delibegovic-Broome KC and Elisabeth Roxburgh (instructed by Burness Paull LLP and Macfarlanes LLP) Timeline...

Date [ date ] Parties [ name of Landlord ], [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) ], whose registered office is at [ address ] [ together with an address for service in England and Wales at [ address ] ] (the Landlord); [ name of Tenant ], [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) ], with its registered office at [ address ] [ and an address for service in England and Wales at [ address ] ] (the Tenant); [ [ name of Guarantor ], [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) ], having its registered office at [ address ] [ and an address for service in England and Wales at [ address ] ] (the Guarantor) ]...

1 Consider seeking external advice Recognising fully how intricate many sanctions frameworks are; the risk that offences may span several jurisdictions, and nuanced issues arising in relation to privilege and in‑house counsel, it is often prudent to obtain specialist guidance from external solicitors promptly at the earliest opportunity once any breach is identified. 2 Cease dealing with the sanctioned entity/person/funds etc Stop all dealings with any sanctioned entity/person/funds etc immediately. Hold the transaction, but do not return funds to the sanctioned entity or person. Where funds have reached the UK from a designated person outside the EU, government policy mandates that those funds are frozen on entry to the UK...

1. Immediate response Your initial priorities are to reach your legal counsel, get to the site, and pull together your Dawn Raid Response Team. Actions Contact the organisation’s legal adviser, whether in-house or external, and ensure a solicitor is physically present throughout the raid and any interviews. If you are not already on-site, attend the premises immediately and engage with the investigators. Seek clarity on what the investigators are seeking—ask to view the warrant or decision notice, or any other written documentation demonstrating their authority. Identify whether any other premises are being raided at the same time. Verify the investigators’ authority and take a photocopy of their ID. Contact and convene the Response Team. 2. Preliminary assessment You may feel inclined to alert affected individuals straight away, but you need more detail before deciding if that is necessary or sensible. Your immediate aim is to establish the precise reason and scope of the raid, and the...

In numerous matters, one or both sides in a legal dispute appear without lawyers, representing themselves in the proceedings. This occurs for a range of reasons; frequently, the cause is an inability to obtain legal representation because of limited personal finances. Every section of the legal profession, under its respective code of conduct and in line with its duties to the court, is obliged to treat litigants in person with fairness and respect. In addition, the Judicial College Guidance offers further direction to the judiciary on the role of the judge when a case features a litigant in person within proceedings of this kind...

Section 7 of the Bribery Act 2010 (BA 2010) provides: (1) A relevant commercial organisation (“C”) is guilty of an offence under this section if a person (“A”) associated with C offers a bribe to another person with the intention of: (a) securing or retaining business for C; or (b) securing or retaining an advantage in the conduct of C’s business. (2) However, it is a defence for C to prove that it had in place adequate procedures devised to prevent persons associated with C from carrying out such conduct. BA 2010, s 8 defines an associated person: (1) For the purposes of section 7, a person (“A”) is associated with C if (disregarding any bribe under consideration) A is a person who performs services for or on behalf of C. (2) The capacity in which A performs services for or on behalf of C does not matter. (3) Accordingly A may (for example) be C’s...