Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“LexisPSL and the other Lexis solutions support our business in exactly the way we want. They enable us to quickly turn around work and deliver the best possible service to our clients.”

SBP Law

Access all documents on Crichel Down Rules

Crichel Down Rules meaning

Published by a LexisNexis Energy expert
What does Crichel Down Rules mean?
Government policy under which public bodies, primarily UK central government departments and many of their agencies, must generally offer back surplus land to the former owner (or successors in title) if it was acquired by compulsory purchase (CPO) or under the threat of compulsion and is no longer needed. The offer is typically made at current market value before any open‑market disposal. The Crichel Down Rules are non‑statutory administrative guidance (not defined in legislation or case law). They do not create a legal right to reacquire, and there are recognised exceptions, including where the land’s character has materially changed, where tracing former owners is impracticable, or where offer‑back would conflict with clear public policy objectives. Local authorities are not automatically bound, though many adopt similar principles in their disposal policies. In practice, the Rules shape disposal strategy, due diligence and negotiations on CPO schemes, requiring early identification of former owners and documentation of any decision to depart from offer‑back. Jurisdiction: broadly consistent in principle across the UK, with separate but parallel guidance in Scotland and Northern Ireland. The concept is UK‑specific; there is no direct equivalent in Ireland, where disposals of publicly owned land follow general value‑for‑money and statutory consent frameworks without...
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about Crichel Down Rules

NEWS
Planning weekly: UKSC in Finch on downstream emissions in EIA; Enfield park lease upheld under LGA 1972; new guidance, Q&As and alerts (England and Wales)

In this issue: Environmental impact assessment Best consideration and the Crichel Down rules LexTalk®Planning: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Latest Q&As Related Documents Environmental impact assessment Supreme Court declares planning permission unlawful for not addressing downstream greenhouse gas emissions from oil production (R (Finch) v Surrey CC) In R (on the application of Finch on behalf of the Weald Action Group) v Surrey County Council and others [2024] UKSC 20, the Supreme Court ruled, by a 3:2 majority, that consent for commercial oil production was unlawful because it failed to evaluate the ‘downstream’ greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that will inevitably occur when the refined fuel is burnt. The omission to assess downstream, or ‘Scope 3’, GHG emissions contravened the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regulations, which require decision-makers, for specified projects, to consider the ‘direct and indirect significant effects of a project’ on the climate. The court held that the...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Crichel Down Rules

PRACTICE NOTES
Compulsory purchase of protected land under the Acquisition of Land Act 1981: statutory undertakers, commons and open space, National Trust, Crown land and listed buildings (England and Wales)

Context When an acquiring authority intends, as part of a compulsory purchase order (CPO) to which the Acquisition of Land Act 1981 (ALA 1981) applies, to obtain any land or interests, or to create new rights over land that benefits from special protection, additional procedures and/or safeguards come into play. The protected land categories, and the processes that must be observed for each, are prescribed in ALA 1981, Pt III (for the acquisition of land or interests) and ALA 1981, Sch 3, Pt I (for securing rights by creating new rights) and are discussed below. In England, the Compulsory purchase process: guidance, and in Wales, the Compulsory Purchase in Wales and ‘The Crichel Down Rules (Wales Version 2020)’ (Circular 003/2019) (together, the CPO Guidance), provide advice on how those provisions should be applied in practice. It is crucial that land with special protection is identified early in the CPO process, and that negotiations with owners of such land begin promptly and in earnest, to secure the land/interests/rights by agreement....

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Crichel Down Rules: offer-back of surplus compulsorily acquired land—scope, exceptions, procedure and judicial review (England and Wales)

Acquiring authorities frequently dispose of land obtained through compulsory purchase. This often follows their role in assembling the interests required to enable a scheme, after which, once the compulsory purchase order (CPO) is implemented, the land is passed to a developer to deliver the project. Sometimes, however, land taken via a CPO later proves surplus to requirements. In those circumstances, an acquiring authority may wish to, or be obliged to, dispose of the land. The Crichel Down Rules require that, in certain situations, surplus government land acquired by, or under the threat of, compulsion is offered back to former owners, their successors, or to sitting tenants. The Rules are non‑statutory, although, as noted below, the courts expect compliance where they apply. In England, the Crichel Down Rules are set out in the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government guidance on ‘’ (the English Rules). In Wales, the Crichel Down Rules are contained in the Welsh Government guidance ‘Compulsory Purchase in Wales and the Crichel Down Rules’ (the Welsh...

Read More Right Arrow