Powered by Lexis+® UK
Glossary
CASE STUDY

“LexisPSL and the other Lexis solutions support our business in exactly the way we want. They enable us to quickly turn around work and deliver the best possible service to our clients.”

SBP Law

Access all documents on Custody time limit

Custody time limit meaning

What does Custody time limit mean?
The maximum period a defendant can be held on remand before their trial must begin, unless the court lawfully extends the deadline. In England and Wales and in Northern Ireland, custody time limits (CTLs) are set by statute and regulations, with different limits by case type and stage (including in the Magistrates’ Court and Crown Court). A court may extend only where there is good and sufficient cause and the prosecution has acted with due diligence and expedition; reasons must be given and a new limit set. If a CTL expires without extension, the defendant must be released on bail, although the prosecution may continue. In Scotland, statutory custody time limits under the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 include the well‑known 110‑day rule in solemn proceedings. The court may extend on cause shown, considering the reasons for delay and the Crown’s diligence. Breach generally requires the accused’s liberation and may result in the proceedings being deserted. In Ireland, there is no fixed statutory custody time limit. Pre‑trial detention is governed by the Constitution and the ECHR: courts assess reasonable expedition and may grant bail, order release under Article 40 (habeas corpus), or prohibit a trial due to delay.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Practice Notes about Custody time limit

PRACTICE NOTES
Fines on Criminal Conviction in England and Wales: Magistrates’ and Crown Court Powers, Maximum Fines, Sentencing Bands, Surcharges, Corporate Offenders, Enforcement and Remission

The principal rules for imposing fines after conviction sit in sections 118–132 of the Sentencing Act 2020 (SA 2020), also called the Sentencing Code. On conviction, a court may order a monetary penalty in place of, or in addition to, another sentence where the offence allows a fine, and this can occur in either the Crown Court or the magistrates’ court. Any financial penalty must reflect the seriousness of the conduct and may not exceed any statutory maximum attached to the offence. A fine is inappropriate where the gravity of the offence demands immediate custody, and it must not be used where a mandatory sentence applies (for example, life imprisonment for murder). See: A-G’s Reference (No 41 of 1994) (1995) 16 Cr App Rep (S) 792 (not reported by LexisNexis®). Where an offence sets a ceiling for the amount, the court is bound by that cap. Maximum fines Magistrates’ court Certain criminal offences heard in the magistrates’ court have an upper limit on fines prescribed by statute...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
CIIAM Arbitration Rules 2024: Awards, Time Limits, Institutional Scrutiny, Post-award Corrections and Optional Challenge, Costs, Confidentiality and Termination

Introduction This Practice Note serves as a handbook to arbitration conducted by the International and Ibero-American Arbitration Center of Madrid (‘CIIAM’ or the ‘Center’) (formerly CIAM-CIAR) pursuant to its arbitration rules effective from 1 January 2024 (the Arbitration Rules). It focuses on the issuance of awards, the assessment and apportionment of costs, and the ways in which proceedings can be brought to a close. Time limit for rendering awards The Arbitration Rules set timetable parameters that marry predictability with sufficient flexibility. They differentiate between standard proceedings and accelerated options (‘abbreviated procedure’ and ‘highly expedited procedure’). The Center oversees adherence to time limits, and arbitrators’ timeliness may influence both applications for extensions and the setting of fees (Arts 4.5, 49.1, and institutional guidance on award scrutiny). In ordinary proceedings, unless the parties stipulate otherwise, tribunals must issue awards on the merits within three months after the hearing or the final substantive submission. Submissions on costs are not treated as substantive when computing this period. Moreover, the Arbitration...

Read More Right Arrow