“I'm able to do more in the day, which means I'm providing more value to my clients - and it's helped my margins in terms of how much I can bill. LexisNexis is helping me make money.”
ParrisWhittakerAccess all documents on D&O insurance
In this issue Working time and flexible working Pay Tax Prohibited conduct (discrimination etc) Employment tribunal equality claims Diversity and gender pay gap Industrial action Unfair dismissal Employment tribunals Immigration Northern Ireland ESG and sustainability: employment issues Daily and weekly news alerts Dates for your diary Trackers New Q&As Working time and flexible working Code of Practice (Requests for Flexible Working) Order 2024 (SI 2024/429): The Order designates 6 April 2024 as the date on which the updated Code of Practice on handling requests for flexible working, issued by the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (Acas) under section 199 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (TULR(C)A 1992), takes effect. It also clarifies that the revised Code does not cover applications for flexible working made under section 80F of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996) that are lodged on or before 5 April 2024;...
Advantage Insurance Co Ltd v Stoodley and another [2018] EWHC 2135 (QB), [2018] All ER (D) 79 (Aug) What are the practical implications of the judgment? Two key, practical takeaways arise from this decision. Substantive point: a motor insurer granting cover under a DOC extension is insuring a liability that must be provided for under section 145 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 (RTA 1988). Consequently, a DOC insurer may function not only as a contractual insurer but also as a hybrid insurer (a contractual insurer whose liability is adjusted by RTA 1988, s 148) or as a statutory insurer under RTA 1988, s 151. This will matter in situations where multiple insurers are involved. Procedural point: claimants who anticipate an adverse ruling cannot sidestep it by discontinuing before judgment and then attempting to re‑litigate the same issue. Where a claimant discontinues in those circumstances, a defendant would be well advised to seek an order setting aside the notice of discontinuance. Whilst the law...
In this issue: Forfeiture Contractual issues Repairing obligations and dilapidations Service charges Key developments and horizon scanning Property disputes in Scotland LexTalk®Property Disputes: a Lexis®Nexis community Additional Property disputes updates Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Trackers Latest Q&As Forfeiture Valuing a claim for wrongful forfeiture (Tanfield (as executor of the Estate of Paul Watkins) v Meadowbrook Montessori Ltd) In Tanfield (as executor of the Estate of Paul Watkins) v Meadowbrook Montessori Ltd [2024] EWHC 1759 (Ch), [2024] All ER (D) 77 (Jul), the court threw out a landlord’s winding-up petition for £167,593.41 presented against a company established to operate a school. It held there was a firmly arguable position that the majority of the petitioned sum was not rent arrears, but consideration payable for shares in the company. The judge further acknowledged a cross-claim with a genuine prospect of success, quantified at no less than £546,000 in...
Practice Note This Practice Note consists of two strands created to help dispute resolution practitioners remain up to date with developments in case law that affect their field, or which influence civil litigation procedure more generally: selected forthcoming appeals to the Supreme Court are highlighted below; see Key forthcoming appeals to the Supreme Court—2022 summaries of significant appeal decisions in England and Wales (ie rulings of the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court and, where appropriate, certain judgments of the Competition Appeal Tribunal, Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, Court of Justice of the European Union), and ECtHR, which we have covered; see: Key forthcoming appeal cases—2022 You can navigate this content using the table of contents in the left-hand margin. Alternatively, search this tracker using [CTRL]+[F]. This material is not intended to be a comprehensive register of every appeal or major decision relevant to dispute resolution practitioners. Key forthcoming appeals to the Supreme Court—2022 Tort and negligence ...
ARCHIVED: this Practice Note is archived, not kept up to date, and provided for background reference only. Moreover, some links may no longer point to the provisions as they stood on the date this Practice Note’s guidance was published. Key Part 36 cases 2016—what do you need to know? Although the updated Part 36 took effect a little over 18 months ago, intending to ease interpretative difficulties in a scheme designed to encourage settlement (and thereby save court time), problems under Part 36 remain. The position through 2016 is unchanged, with recurring issues continuing to arise despite the revisions...
What are Incoterms and what is their origin? Incoterms—short for ‘International Commercial Terms’—are a set of globally recognised trading terms used in international, and at times domestic, contracts for buying and selling goods. They comprise 11 three‑letter abbreviations, each standing for a distinct package of provisions that apportion duties, costs and risks within a sale and purchase agreement. The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) publishes rules that interpret Incoterms and explain the meaning of each term. First issued in 1936, these rules are updated from time to time to mirror developments in trading practices. In September 2019, the ICC released the most recent edition, Incoterms 2020, effective from 1 January 2020 (although parties could opt to apply the 2020 rules earlier if they wished). For the complete text of the 2020 rules, see the following Practice Notes: Incoterms® 2020—introduction Incoterms® 2020 Rules—EXW Ex works Incoterms® 2020 Rules—FCA Free Carrier Incoterms® 2020 Rules—CPT Carriage paid to Incoterms® 2020 Rules—CIP Carriage and insurance paid...
This Licence is entered into on [ insert date ] (the Commencement Date): Parties [ insert licensor name ], a company incorporated in [ England and Wales ] under number [ insert company number ], whose registered office is at [ insert address ] (the Licensor); and [ insert licensee name ], a company incorporated in [ England and Wales ] under number [ insert company number ], whose registered office is at [ insert address ] (the Licensee), (each of the Licensor and the Licensee being a party and, together, the Licensor and the Licensee are the parties). Background (A) [ Explain the relationship between the Licensor and the Licensee. ] (B) [ The Licensor has entered into an agreement with the Licensee [ dated [ insert date ] ] (the Main Agreement) for [ insert other description of relevant transaction (referencing any relevant related agreements) ] (‘ Transaction ’). ] (C) The Licensor has agreed to...
Insurance Premium Adjustment for D&O Climate-related Financial Disclosures (Archie’s Clause) (The Chancery Lane Project) This clause encourages organisations to lessen climate exposure by offering lower insurance premiums to policyholders who satisfy agreed reporting disclosure standards for climate-related financial risks...
Agreement in relation to [ insert brief details of the works/project ] at [ insert address of works ] ( incorporating (inter alia) the JCT Intermediate Sub-Contract with sub-contractor’s design Agreement 2016 (ICSub/D/A 2016) and JCT Intermediate Sub-Contract with sub-contractor’s design Conditions 2016 (ICSub/D/C 2016) as modified and supplemented in the manner indicated in this Agreement and the Schedules hereto ) This Agreement is entered into on the [ insert number ] day of [ insert month ] 20[ insert year ]. Parties [ insert name of the Contractor ] (company registration number [ insert number ]), whose registered office is at [ insert address of the Contractor ] ('the Contractor'). [ insert name of the Sub-Contractor ] (company registration number [ insert number ]), whose registered office is at [ insert address of the Sub-Contractor ] ('the Sub-Contractor'). It is now agreed as follows: 1 Interpretation For the purposes of this Agreement, words and expressions shall bear the...
Amendments to the International Tax Compliance Regulations 2015 (2015 regs), SI 2015/878, introduced by the International Tax Compliance (Amendment) Regulations 2025, SI 2025/740, have brought in a compulsory Automatic Exchange of Information (AEOI) registration obligation for certain trusts treated as ‘specified non-reporting financial institutions’. Under the 2015 regs, SI 2015/878, reg 24(1), a specified non-reporting financial institution is ‘a non-reporting financial institution which is a trust within the meaning of Section VIII(B)(1)(e) of the CRS or paragraph II(D) of Annex II to the FATCA agreement’. Set out below is a concise overview of the components of that definition. Financial institution (IEIM400610) The FATCA and CRS frameworks recognise four common categories of Financial Institution: custodial institution depository institution investment entity specified insurance company Where a private trust satisfies any Financial Institution definition, it will most commonly be treated as an Investment Entity...