Date of filing meaning

This Checklist sets out the principal procedural steps and considerations for parties preparing or answering a request to extend time in judicial review claims before the Administrative Court. It should be read alongside Practice Note: Judicial review time limits—extensions and urgent cases. Time limits for bringing claims and the requirement to act 'promptly' Where proceedings are started in the High Court, the claim form must be lodged promptly and, in any case, no later than three months from the date the grounds first arose, subject to the shorter periods below: challenges to planning decisions must be issued within six weeks of the date the grounds to bring the claim first arose challenges to procurement decisions under the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 must be brought within 30 days of the date the grounds to bring the claim first arose...

Caveat is entered Non-Contentious Probate Rules 1987 (NCPR 1987), SI 1987/2024 (as amended) Apply for a caveat online or via Form PA8A (see the forms tab within the Probate actions subtopic) — NCPR 1987, SI 1987/2024, r 44(2). The caveator lodges the caveat at the Principal Registry of the Family Division or at a district probate registry by post or electronically — NCPR 1987, SI 1987/2024, r 44. Fee: £3; if submitted electronically, payment must also be electronic — NCPR 1987, SI 1987/2024, r 44. The deceased’s name is recorded in the index of caveats — NCPR 1987, SI 1987/2024, r 44(4). Unless otherwise provided, the caveat endures for six months from the date of entry — NCPR 1987, SI 1987/2024, r 44(3)(a). The index of caveats is checked — NCPR 1987, SI 1987/2024, r 44(4). On receiving an application for a grant at the registry of filing or notice of an application made elsewhere, the district judge or registrar...

What is form MR01 (Particulars of a charge) and when do you use one? A charge granted by a company registered in the UK must be filed at Companies House unless an exception in section 859A(6) of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) applies (see: Which company charges are registrable at Companies House?). Missing the filing window can have serious consequences, so it is essential to complete registration within the required period. Form MR01 (Particulars of a charge) is the Companies House document used to record a company charge where the charge is: created, or evidenced, by an instrument dated on or after 6 April 2013 made by a UK-registered company If a company charge is not created or evidenced by an instrument, you should instead use form MR08 (Particulars of a charge where there is no instrument) to register it at Companies House. For details of other Companies House forms for registering company charges, see: ...

Opposed business lease renewal—flowchart This flowchart outlines the process for an opposed renewal of a business lease under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (LTA 1954). It covers timing for service of an opposed section 25 notice, or a section 26 request counter-notice identifying the ground(s) of opposition under LTA 1954, s 30(1), the commencement of opposed proceedings, filing statements of case, and the court’s ultimate order—termination or grant of a new lease, or discontinuance or dismissal of the claim If the tenant remains in occupation for business purposes after the contractual term ends, the lease continues automatically, provided the conditions in LTA 1954, s 23 are met Either party may end the statutory protection under the existing lease by serving a termination notice: landlord’s section 25 notice; tenant’s section 26 request; section 27 notice. This flowchart addresses opposed renewals only. For the unopposed renewal route, see: Unopposed lease renewal procedure—flowchart. Note 1: Diarise a date at least 12–18...

Under Irish legislation, each company is required to have its financial statements examined by a statutory auditor, except where it qualifies for, and uses, an exemption. Until recently, per section 363 of the Companies Act 2014 (Ireland) (CA 2014 (IRL)), a company that did not submit its annual return within 56 days of its annual return date forfeited the ability to rely on this exemption for the subsequent two years, effectively as a sanction for late filing...

PI & Clinical Negligence weekly highlights—24 July 2025 In this issue: Key PI and Clinical negligence developments Occupational disease Accidents abroad Other PI and Clinical negligence news LexTalk® PI & Clinical Negligence: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts LexisNexis® Webinars Useful information Key PI and Clinical negligence developments SI 2025/893 (Civil Procedure (Amendment No 2) Rules 2025) modifies the Civil Procedure Rules 1998, SI 1998/3132, revising Rule 2.8 (time) and Rule 5.5 (filing and sending documents) to reflect the roll-out of new Practice Direction 5C covering the CE-File electronic filing and case management system, following its piloting under Practice Direction 51O (electronic working pilot scheme). The changes come into force in part on 12 September 2025, and in full on 1 October 2025. Refer to LNB News 22/07/2025 19 for details. NHS Resolution publishes Annual Report and Accounts for 2024/25 NHS Resolution has issued its Annual Report and Accounts for 2024/25,...

Fauré Le Page Maroquinier SAS, Fauré Le Page Paris SAS v Goyard ST-Honoré SAS, Case C‑412/24 What are the practical implications of this case? Article 3(1)(g) of Directive 2008/95/EC blocks registration of trade marks that, at filing, are likely to mislead the public about the nature, quality, or geographical origin of the goods or services. The AG states a mark must contain a precise indication of those features. On that view, inserting a year, without wording that makes clear it denotes the proprietor’s incorporation date or the first manufacture of the goods, is not sufficiently specific. The focus is the filing date; if the sign risks deception, it is caught by Article 3(1)(g). For invalidity actions under that ground, outside issues — for example, whether the proprietor can legitimately claim the year as part of its heritage — are irrelevant. The question is whether the mark itself clearly and specifically describes the relevant nature, quality, or geographical origin...

People with significant control (PSC) regime The architecture of the people with significant control (PSC) regime, which first commenced on 6 April 2016, is contained in Part 21A of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006). Its purpose is to tackle worries about the lack of transparency in corporate ownership, where historically the register captured only the legal holder of shares, not always the beneficial owner. By requiring a PSC register, more precise and up‑to‑date details are available about who ultimately owns and directs companies and other bodies, and this information is made public via the central register at Companies House and remains accessible to the public. It assists prospective investors in their decision‑making. It likewise aids law enforcement bodies with money laundering enquiries. LLPs formed under the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 must keep a record of persons with significant control over the LLP under the Limited Liability Partnerships (Register of People with Significant Control) Regulations 2016, SI 2016/340 (the LLP Regulations), as amended by the Information about People...

NOTE—to check whether notification thresholds in Vietnam and worldwide are triggered, please consult: Where to Notify. 1. Have there been any recent developments regarding the Vietnamese merger control regime and are any updates/developments expected in the coming year? Are there any other ‘hot’ merger control issues in Vietnam? In 2020, Vietnam promulgated Decree 35 on Detailed Regulations for Implementation of the Law on Competition dated 24 March 2020 (Decree 35), which became effective on 15 May 2020. This marked a pivotal step in putting into operation the competition framework envisaged under the Law on Competition dated 12 June 2018 (Competition Law). The body designated under the Competition Law, the Vietnam Competition Committee (VCC), was established on 1 April 2023 and from that date assumed responsibility for the merger control regime. Decree 35 introduced the following clarifications to merger control: Notification thresholds, under which a transaction must be notified where: the total assets or turnover in Vietnam of...

This Practice Note sets out how to initiate arbitration under the 2021 International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) Rules of Arbitration (ICC Rules). The ICC Rules govern any ICC arbitrations begun on or after 1 January 2021, unless the parties expressly agree that an earlier version will apply. For an overview of the 2021 ICC Rules, see Practice Note: ICC (2021)—introduction to the ICC and arbitration under the ICC Rules. For guidance on the 2017 and 2012 ICC Rules, see: ICC arbitration—overview. Prior to commencing an arbitration pursuant to the ICC Rules When a dispute arises, it is crucial for parties and their advisers to check the dispute resolution clause in the relevant contract. If it provides for arbitration under the ICC Rules, at the outset the parties should consider, among other points: any limitation period (whether contractual or statutory) by which the arbitration must be commenced. For more detail under English and Welsh law, see Practice Note: Limitation periods in arbitration (England & Wales) ...

To: Singapore International Arbitration Centre28 Maxwell Road, 03–01 Maxwell Chambers SuitesBY [ SPECIFY MODE OF DELIVERY ]Singapore 069115 Attn: The Registrar With copy, including all attachments, to: [ Insert name and address of all Respondents ]BY [ SPECIFY MODE OF DELIVERY ] Dear [ Registrar of SIAC ], We enclose a Notice of Arbitration, now lodged with the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) in accordance with rule 3 of the SIAC Rules of Arbitration, 6th Edition, 2016 (SIAC Rules). A copy is being served on the Respondent(s) by the service method(s) indicated above. The service date is [ insert anticipated date of delivery ]. [ Pursuant to rule 3.1(k) of the SIAC Rules, we attach a local cheque for [ insert amount ], payable to the Singapore International Arbitration Centre, covering the required filing fee. OR Pursuant to rule 3.1(k) of the SIAC Rules, the sum of [ insert amount ], being the requisite filing fees, was remitted on [ insert date ]...

The Secretariat of the International Court of ArbitrationInternational Chamber of Commerce [ Address of an approved ICC office and by email to the relevant address for the office ] [ Date ] Dear [ ICC Secretariat ], Request for Arbitration : [ Party names ] [ Law firm case reference number ] Please find herewith enclosed our Request for Arbitration submitted pursuant to the 2021 ICC Rules of Arbitration (ICC Rules) [ with accompanying documents ], on behalf of [ name of claimant party or parties ] whom we represent and advise. We additionally enclose [ the filing fee of US$ [X,XXX]. OR A filing fee of US$ [X,XXX] has been made by wire transfer with reference [ insert reference ]. ]. [ The Claimant requests, in accordance with article 4(4)(b) of the ICC Rules, that the Secretariat transmits the Request by delivery against receipt, registered post or courier. We enclose [ number ] of hard copies. ] Please kindly acknowledge safe receipt...

Company number: [ insert number ] [ insert company name ] PLC Minutes of a meeting of the [ committee of the ] board of directors (the Meeting) of [ insert company name ] plc (the Company) Venue: [ insert place of meeting ] Date: [ insert day, month and year of meeting ] at [ insert time of meeting ] [ am OR pm ] Present [ Insert names of the director(s) physically present ] [ [ Insert names of any directors present by telephone as permitted by the Company’s articles of association ] (by telephone) ] [ [ Insert names of any directors present by other means permitted by the Company’s articles of association ] (by [ insert other means ]) ] In attendance [ [ Insert name of anyone in attendance, who does not count towards the quorum for the Meeting (eg the company secretary, any legal advisers) ] ] ...

To persuade the court to grant a decree nisi, proof that the application for a matrimonial order has been duly served is required. Ordinarily, this can be shown by producing the acknowledgement of service filed in the divorce proceedings. If the respondent does not return an acknowledgement of service or lodge any documentation, the petitioner must establish service. The petitioner may choose to arrange personal service of the petition on the respondent and any co-respondent. Where, after personal service, no acknowledgement of service is filed by the respondent, the person who effected service must file a certificate of service stating the precise date and time of that personal service. That certificate should be completed in Form FP6. If an application has been served on a respondent, no acknowledgement of service has been returned to the court office, and the court is satisfied that the said respondent has received the application, the court may direct that the application is deemed served (Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010), SI 2010/2955, 6.16(1))...