Powered by Lexis+®
CASE STUDY

“It's hard to quantify, right now. But at a guess, I'd say it's probably more than 50% faster, at times. It's literally that quick. We've found to be an essential practical tool. We're very satisfied.”

Walsall Council

Access all documents on De-averaging

De-averaging meaning

What does De-averaging mean?
De-averaging (sometimes written deaveraging) describes moving from a single nationally averaged tariff or charge to differentiated prices by geography, customer location or type of service, usually to reflect underlying cost differences. It is a descriptive regulatory and competition law term rather than one generally defined in statute, though it is widely used in price control decisions, regulatory guidance and determinations. Key features include: - May apply at wholesale or retail level (e.g., network access charges versus end-user tariffs). - Typically justified by cost-reflective pricing, but constrained by non-discrimination, transparency and consumer protection duties. - Universal service obligations can require averaged pricing for certain services, limiting or prohibiting geographic de-averaging (e.g., basic telecoms or postal services). - Implementation often requires regulatory approval and consultation. The concept is used consistently across England & Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, and in Ireland, with sector-specific rules set by the relevant regulators (e.g., Ofcom, Ofgem, Ofwat, ORR; the Utility Regulator in Northern Ireland; ComReg and the CRU in Ireland). Practical significance: de-averaging affects tariff design, procurement and contract drafting, and may raise competition law risks (such as undue discrimination or margin squeeze) if differential pricing distorts competition.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Checklists about De-averaging

CHECKLISTS
CVA Proposals Involving the Pension Protection Fund: Legal Checklist Covering PPF Voting Criteria, Scheme Rescue vs PPF Entry, Anti-Embarrassment Equity, Creditor Treatment, DRCs, PPF Drift and Levy Protections

This Checklist This Checklist provides points to weigh up when preparing and seeking sign-off for a company voluntary arrangement (CVA) involving the Pension Protection Fund (PPF). It draws on PPF Guidance Note 5 issued in 2018 (see PPF Guidance Note 5: CVAs). When an employing company (or all participating employers in a last man standing scheme) files a CVA proposal with the court, a PPF assessment period begins. Under section 137 of the Pensions Act 2004, the PPF assumes the pension trustees’ voting entitlement (see Practice Note: The Pension Protection Fund—eligibility and entry). In practice, the PPF will typically cast a vote for or against the proposal rather than refrain. The PPF is consistently focused on avoiding any precedent that might allow pension schemes to be diluted where potential PPF entry could arise in the near future (the PPF observes that this has occurred in numerous prior CVAs). The PPF also anticipates that pension trustees will appoint their financial advisers to produce a report addressing the areas of concern...

Read More Right Arrow
CHECKLISTS
Equity Investment Agreement: Practitioner Drafting and Negotiation Checklist covering Subscription, Warranties, Board Governance, Investor Protections, Transfers, Covenants, Exits and General Provisions

Parties Who are the parties involved? In particular, specify: the investor(s) the managers the investee company (newco) Conditions Are there any conditions to completing the investment? What are each party’s obligations to meet those conditions, and by what deadline? Share subscription What will the investee company’s capital structure be? Which class and how many shares will each shareholder (the investor, the managers and any other shareholders) subscribe for? Warranties Who will give the warranties? Is it limited to the managers? Will they be provided jointly, jointly and severally, or on a several basis? How wide will the warranties be? It is usual for investment agreement warranties to centre on the business plan and the managers, as the acquisition agreement generally affords the investor sufficient protection regarding the company. What restrictions will apply to warranty claims? These may include: periods within which claims must be notified caps on each warrantor’s liability and on...

Read More Right Arrow
CHECKLISTS
Occupational pension scheme mergers: legal and procedural checklist for planning, implementation and winding-up

Planning of merger Secure an 'in principle' commitment from the trustees and employers of both the transferring and receiving schemes to proceed with the merger. Examine the governing provisions for each scheme to verify that the transfer of assets, liabilities and members can take place; amend those provisions where necessary and practical. Confirm whether the schemes' benefit structures align and are compatible. Assess if the contracted-out status of either scheme creates any issues. Review the funding positions of both schemes and obtain actuarial advice; determine whether an employer top-up contribution is required. ...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related News about De-averaging

NEWS
EU competition law: General Court upholds Commission on Spanish shipbuilding tax lease aid; merger notifications; Ukraine crisis agricultural aid; CJEU Gazprom antitrust appeal; upcoming dates 21 February 2024

State aid General Court dismisses appeals regarding Spanish aid for the acquisition of ships The General Court delivered its ruling in Joined Cases T- 29/14 Telefónica Gestión Integral de Edificios y Servicios (formerly Taetal) v Commission and T- 31/14 Banco Santander v Commission, brought against the Commission’s decision of 17 July 2013. That decision concluded that a Spanish scheme for purchasing ships, structured around leasing and financing through tax relief, involved unlawful State aid (SA.21233) (the Commission’s 2013 decision). The Court rejected the actions. Under that arrangement, a shipowner could have a new vessel constructed with a rebate applied to the price set by the shipyard. To benefit from the reduced price (net of the rebate), the shipping company was required to agree to acquire the vessel not directly from the shipyard, but from an economic interest grouping (EIG) created under Spanish law and established by a bank. The Commission’s 2013 decision has already been considered in earlier cases. The Commission’s 2013 decision has been the subject of previous...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
EU competition update 8 January 2025: STRABAG/Becker JV clearance, simplified merger notifications, and CJEU State aid hearing in Commission v Bulgaria

Mergers Following a phase I investigation, the Commission approved the formation of a joint venture between STRABAG AG and Becker Umweltdienste GmbH (M.11790)—see further, Midday Express. The Commission received notifications for: General Atlantic/PSG/Hostaway (M.11864) (simplified merger procedure) Eichler Consulting/Maximilian Aicher/Evelyne Maria Aicher/Wolfgang Reitzle/Telchar Investments/RMH Production (M.11842) (simplified merger procedure) Ares/GCP (M.11787) (simplified merger procedure) Note—For ongoing merger investigations before the Commission, see the EU mergers—ongoing cases tracker. State aid The Court of Justice held a hearing in Case C‑632/23 Commission v Bulgaria (Échanges de terrains forestiers II), an action brought by the Commission against Bulgaria for failing to comply with Decision SA.26212 concerning aid granted to private forest owners—see further, application. Note—For all live State aid appeals before the Court of Justice, see the Court of Justice State aid appeals—ongoing cases tracker. Upcoming dates For dates of forthcoming EU competition developments, see...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Court of Appeal (England and Wales) gives broad reading to ‘interests’ amendment restriction, stopping BBC’s DB scheme cost-cutting by reducing future accrual benefits

The panel of justices at the appellate court decided, in a unanimous opinion, that the effort by the BBC to reduce its rising costs in the BBC Pension Scheme (the Scheme) undermined the interests of its members. The dispute focused on interpreting a provision within the Scheme’s governing deeds, which safeguards members from changes impinging on their ‘interests’. Justice Kim Lewison observed that, when considering if an active member possesses an interest in the particular elements of the benefit design challenged in the claim form, his conclusion—mirroring the judge’s—was affirmative. The case was closely fought over this point of construction within the Scheme’s legal deeds in question...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about De-averaging

PRACTICE NOTES
UK CMA merger investigation: Clariant’s proposed acquisition of Kilfrost’s European aircraft and rail de-icing fluid business abandoned following provisional SLC findings (2015–2016)

CASE HUB ARCHIVED –this archived case hub reflects the position at the date of the abandonment of the transaction on 13 June 2016; it is no longer maintained. See further, timeline and commentary. Case facts Outline UK merger review of Clariant’s intended purchase of the Kilfrost Group’s European aircraft de-icing fluid and rail de-icing fluid business. The deal presented a horizontal overlap in the supply of aircraft de-/anti-icing fluids. Latest developments On 13 June 2016, the CMA stated the investigation was cancelled after the parties chose to abandon the deal. On 10 June 2016, the parties had announced their decision to withdraw following the CMA’s provisional findings and the expectation that the transaction would have been prohibited. Parties Clariant AG: a Swiss-based speciality chemicals company, headquartered near Basle, operating in 150 countries worldwide. Kilfrost plc: a UK-based firm in Newcastle specialising in heating and cooling products. The target business is Kilfrost’s European aircraft de-icing fluid and rail de-icing fluid operations. Kilfrost’s...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
UK VAT Penalties: Civil (Default Surcharge Pre-2023 and FA 2021 Late Submission/Payment), Fraud, Inaccuracies, Mitigation, Reasonable Excuse and Criminal Offences

This Practice Note outlines when someone can become liable to a VAT-related penalty. A person charged with a VAT penalty may have a right of appeal; for guidance on appeal rules, see Practice Note: Appealing an HMRC decision. Civil penalties There are two broad types of civil penalties: those arising from failure to meet basic compliance obligations, and those stemming from more serious conduct or omissions This Practice Note highlights the principal penalties in each group; for a comprehensive list, consult the further reading link to De Voil Indirect Tax Service [V5.332]. Civil penalties are issued by HMRC through assessment; for general information on assessments, see Practice Note: VAT assessments. Penalties for basic compliance failures Penalties apply where a taxpayer does not meet core VAT compliance duties, including: breach of regulations made under VATA 1994. These regulations set out detailed collection and payment rules, so most administrative mistakes are covered. Failure to carry out specific obligations,...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
UK income tax treatment of interest in possession trusts: computation, rates (including trust rates), allowable deductions, and the 2024–25 de minimis income rule

General principles The trustees are, for tax purposes, regarded collectively as a single person, distinct from the individuals who serve as trustees from time to time. An interest in possession (IIP) means a beneficiary has an immediate right to the trust income as it arises. That income belongs to the beneficiary, and the trustees lack authority to retain it, save to meet proper expenses. Where trust income does not fall within the definition of accumulated or discretionary income in section 480 of the Income Tax Act 2007 (ITA 2007), it is treated as the income of ‘other persons’ and taxed at the basic and dividend rates. Ultimately, the income is assessed on the beneficiary at their personal rates, irrespective of when, and even whether, it is actually paid to them. Nevertheless, the trustees are liable to income tax on income arising from trust property because they are the legal owners of that property and thus the persons who receive the income. The way IIP and discretionary trusts are differentiated...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Precedents about De-averaging

PRECEDENTS
Buyer-favourable warranty and tax covenant limitations schedule for corporate seller SPAs: periods, caps, de minimis, specific exclusions, claims conduct, third-party recoveries and mitigation

Insert the following as new definitions (if not already included) in the definitions and interpretation clause of the share purchase agreement: 1 Definitions and interpretation Fairly Disclosed • means information [ fully, fairly and accurately ] disclosed [ (relating specifically to the subject matter of the Warranty and without omitting any fact which may render the Warranty and the matter disclosed untrue, inaccurate and misleading) ] and presented with sufficient clarity and detail to allow a buyer to reach a clear, informed and accurate evaluation of the relevant facts, matters or circumstances concerned; Losses • means any and all liabilities, costs, outgoings (including legal expenses), claims, actions, proceedings, damages, fines, penalties, loss of profit [ and Consequential Loss ]; Tax Warranties • denotes the warranties [ and representations ] contained in paragraph [ insert number ] of Schedule [ insert number ], and Tax Warranty refers to any one of them; Warranties • signifies the warranties [ and representations ] included in Schedule [...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Employment, workers, directors and contractors due diligence questionnaire for share purchase transactions (Great Britain)

Definitions CA 2006 means the Companies Act 2006; Company means [ insert name of target company ] Limited, incorporated in England and Wales under number [ insert company number ]; Director refers to a director of any Group Company, including a shadow or de facto director; Employee has the meaning in section 230(1) of ERA 1996 as applied to any Group Company; EqA 2010 means the Equality Act 2010; ERA 1996 means the Employment Rights Act 1996; [ Group means the Company and each of the Subsidiaries, and Group Company means any of them; ] [ Subsidiaries means the subsidiaries of the Company; ] [ subsidiary means [ a subsidiary as defined by section 1159 of CA 2006 OR a subsidiary undertaking as defined by section 1162 of CA 2006 ]; ] Contractor denotes any individual working in a Group Company’s business who is neither an Employee nor a Worker; TUPE 2006 means the Transfer of Undertakings...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Flexitime Policy Template: Core Hours, Weekly Minimum and Averaging, Four-Day Week Option, Application and Record-Keeping, Employer Discretion and Scheme Termination

1 The Company allows staff to adopt flexible hours across the majority of departments and roles within the organisation. [ Exceptions are [ state any exceptions ]. ] Anyone seeking to use the flexitime scheme must submit a written request to [ enter details, eg the Human Resources department ] for consideration of their role under flexitime. No flexible hours may commence until a written confirmation amending their terms of employment to include flexitime has been issued. Flexitime is optional, and staff may keep to the fixed hours set out in their contract of employment...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Q&As about De-averaging

Q&As
Right to Buy: can tenant require removal of fittings excluded from the demise?

Fittings Fittings, sometimes referred to as chattels, are not considered part of the land and, unless there is an express agreement to the contrary, they are not included in the sale of the property. In the absence of any such express provision, and on the assumption that the transaction required vacant possession, those fittings ought to have been taken away by the former landlord prior to completion. The general position regarding fittings left in situ at completion is, subject to the de minimis rule, that the seller must see to it that any goods and rubbish are removed from the property...

Read More Right Arrow