Powered by Lexis+®
Related Content
CASE STUDY

“Although cost was an important factor, our relationship with LexisNexis, their responsiveness, flexibility, and the integration available with other products were key factors.”

Irwin Mitchell

Access all documents on De minimis non curat lex

De minimis non curat lex meaning

What does De minimis non curat lex mean?
A practical shorthand for when courts, tribunals and regulators will not entertain claims or enforcement where the breach, loss or interference is so trivial that no remedy or action is justified. It sets a materiality threshold, rather than providing a standalone defence. This is a Latin common-law maxim, not defined by a single statute, and is applied through case law and discretion across multiple contexts. Typical uses include: - Civil litigation: nominal or no damages for negligible loss; minor contractual breaches not justifying termination; nuisance or trespass claims failing where the interference is insubstantial. - Intellectual property: copying that is not a “substantial part” is often described as de minimis and will not infringe copyright or database right. - Criminal law and regulation: marginal conduct may fall outside an offence definition, or be screened out on public interest/prosecutorial discretion grounds. Usage is broadly consistent across England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland. In Irish/EU competition and State aid, “de minimis” also denotes formal thresholds for agreements of minor importance and small subsidies; in the UK, similar concepts appear in CMA guidance and under subsidy control (e.g., minimal financial assistance), though the Latin label may not be used.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about De minimis non curat lex

NEWS
Gifts and Hospitality under the UK Bribery Act 2010: No De Minimis Rule, Adequate Procedures, Facilitation Payments, and SFO Expectations

De minimis non curat lex translates as ‘the law does not trouble itself with trifles’. Yet the Bribery Act 2010 (BA 2010) suggests otherwise, clearly. Commencing on 1 July 2011, BA 2010 overhauled and superseded antiquated bribery and corruption statutes. It answered criticism of the UK framework from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The Act signals the government’s uncompromising stance on bribery in UK commerce. Though concise—only 20 sections and two schedules—it reaches broadly across jurisdictions, establishes wide-ranging criminal prohibitions, and captures both individuals and companies operating in private and public spheres. Its effect spans both private enterprise and public administration. Matthew Vernon of Osborne Clarke explores the principal issues and risks for businesses around corporate hospitality and gifting, and outlines what organisations can anticipate from the Serious Fraud Office (SFO). Its scope is wide, with effect across private and public sectors alike. Failing to prevent bribery BA 2010 contains three core offences: offering or giving a bribe to another person (active...

Read More Right Arrow