Powered by Lexis+®
CASE STUDY

“LexisNexis is great as I can find the answers I am looking for really quickly. I believe that nothing should be more than 6 clicks away - and the products from LexisNexis deliver on this standard”

Avensure

Access all documents on Debt for equity swap

Debt for equity swap meaning

What does Debt for equity swap mean?
In restructuring practice, a debt for equity swap is a transaction in which creditors agree that some or all of their secured or unsecured debt claims are released or compromised in exchange for shares or other equity interests in the company being restructured (or a newco). The term is descriptive and widely used across corporate restructuring and insolvency contexts; it is not a defined statutory term. Across England & Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, swaps are commonly implemented consensually or via a Companies Act 2006 scheme of arrangement or a Part 26A restructuring plan (which can use cross-class cram down), and may accompany an administration or refinancing. Company voluntary arrangements cannot alter equity without consent. In Ireland, equivalent outcomes are achieved through a Companies Act 2014 scheme of arrangement, examinership (with cram down), or for small companies, SCARP. Usage is broadly consistent across these jurisdictions. Typical features include significant dilution or elimination of existing shareholders, amendment or release of guarantees and security, intercreditor adjustments, and possible issuance of preference shares, convertibles or warrants, often alongside new money. Common in leveraged finance and bond restructurings, swaps deleverage the balance sheet and shift control to creditors. Tax, regulatory, listing and Takeover Code/Irish Takeover Rules...
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about Debt for equity swap

NEWS
Re Sino-Ocean: English restructuring plan confirms assenting class use for cross-class cram down; dissenters must identify alternative; affiliate vote stands; no s901C(3) shareholder meeting; pragmatic value allocation

Re Sino-Ocean Group Holding Ltd [2025] EWHC 205 (Ch) What are the practical implications of this case? The practical implications of this judgment are: Questions about how a voting class is constituted or composed should, preferably, be aired at the convening hearing, not deferred to the sanction hearing. A dissenting creditor cannot simply contend that liquidation or any other ‘relevant alternative’ advanced by the plan company is not the relevant alternative for Condition A; they must also identify a specific alternative. It is not abusive for a plan company to include a consenting class within a plan, even if this enables a cross‑class cram down, provided the plan has a meaningful effect on that assenting class. When assessing any challenge to whether a special interest creditor’s vote is representative, the court will proceed flexibly rather than apply a rigid “but for” test, and will principally ask whether that creditor voted with the class’s interests in view. Any plan that involves a debt‑for‑equity...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Spirit Airlines’ US Chapter 11 reorganisation: debt-for-equity swap, new financing and failed mergers expose ultra-low-cost model fragility and raise consolidation and Chapter 22 risks

After stepping away from merger talks with low-cost peer Frontier, Spirit proceeded with a Chapter 11 plan that it said would significantly reduce leverage and set it up for long-term success. The carrier trimmed US$795m from its US$3.6bn liabilities, yet emerges into challenging macroeconomic conditions, experts noted. Spirit, which declined to comment on 27 February 2025, will swap US$1.6bn of secured borrowings for US$840m of new five-year exit notes and equity. It will also clear a US$300m revolving credit facility at emergence, replace it with a new US$275m revolver, and secure US$350m in fresh equity. ‘It certainly marks progress for Spirit to have both converted sizeable debt to equity and attracted an equity injection’, bankruptcy lawyer Anthony Sabino of Sabino & Sabino PC told Law360. ‘So, the overarching question is, “Will it suffice?”’ As of the petition date, Spirit held US$2.9bn in secured obligations, according to the disclosure statement. The precise post-confirmation debt figure was not immediately available on 27 February 2025. On the remaining balance after the restructuring, Sabino...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Debt for equity swap

PRACTICE NOTES
PizzaExpress Financing 2 plc—Part 26A Companies Act restructuring: debt-for-equity swap, administration as relevant alternative, third‑party releases, Chapter 15 recognition evidence, unanimous class approval (2020)

PizzaExpress Financing 2 plc applied for a Part 26A restructuring plan (RP) at a convening hearing in September 2020 and sanction hearing in October 2020. The principal points are outlined below; unless specified otherwise, capitalised expressions bear the meanings set out in the convening judgment. This Deal Debrief sits within our Restructuring plans collection. For an in-depth look at key metrics from the 2023 RPs and commentary from leading figures in the restructuring arena, see Practice Note: Market Insights Trend Report—trends in Part 26A restructuring plans in 2023 [Archived]. Plan company: PizzaExpress Financing 2 plc (the Company) Industry: Restaurants Debtor’s incorporation and jurisdictional aspects: England & Wales, with COMI in the UK Pre-convening development: the Company executed a Contribution Deed one month prior to the convening hearing, which in effect rendered it a primary obligor...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
UK PFI/PF2 Projects: Key Project, Construction, FM and ICT Contracts; Equity, Debt and Bond Financing; Security, Warranties and Step-in Rights

Project documents This Practice Note offers an overview of several widely used agreements and papers in a PFI/PF2 scheme, though the precise suite adopted will turn on the particular project. In the 2018 Budget (delivered on 29 October 2018), the government stated that PF2 will not be used for new schemes (see News Analysis: Budget 2018—what does it mean for infrastructure and housebuilding?). That said, existing PFI and PF2 arrangements will remain in operation and, given the usual term of such projects, are expected to continue for many years... Project Agreement This is the core contract in any PFI arrangement. It records the full set of terms and conditions governing the relationship between the Authority and Project Co/SPV for the life of the project. Where Project Co/SPV is granted a concession (ie the exclusive right to supply/operate/exploit something to create third party revenue), the Project Agreement may be described as a concession agreement. Typically a substantial document, it is often divided into multiple sections for manageability. Under...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Case debrief: Poundland Part 26A restructuring plan - English High Court sanction, landlord compromises, cross-class cramdown across nine dissenting classes, and debt-for-equity swap

Poundland Limited sought a Part 26A restructuring plan (RP), with a convening hearing in July 2025 and a sanction hearing in August 2025. The principal points are set out below (capitalised terms not explained here have the meanings in the convening and sanction judgments). This Deal Debrief forms part of our Restructuring plans toolkit. For an in-depth review of the key metrics from RPs submitted in 2024, plus commentary from leading figures in restructuring, see News Analysis: Market Insights Trend Report—trends in Part 26A restructuring plans in 2024. Name of plan company Poundland Limited (the Company) Industry sector Retail Place of debtor’s incorporation and jurisdictional factors The Company was incorporated in England and Wales...

Read More Right Arrow