Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“LexisPSL and the other Lexis solutions support our business in exactly the way we want. They enable us to quickly turn around work and deliver the best possible service to our clients.”

SBP Law

Access all documents on Decisions of associations of undertakings

Decisions of associations of undertakings meaning

What does Decisions of associations of undertakings mean?
In practice, this describes rules, recommendations or measures adopted by a trade association, professional body or similar grouping of businesses that influence market conduct. The expression is a statutory term in competition law: article 101(1) TFEU and section 2(1) of the Competition Act 1998 (the Chapter I prohibition), and in Ireland section 4(1) of the Competition Act 2002, all prohibit anti-competitive “decisions by associations of undertakings”. Associations may include trade associations, federations, standard‑setting or certification bodies and purchasing or marketing cooperatives. Decisions can be formal or informal: constitutions, codes of practice, fee scales or price recommendations, membership or access rules, advertising bans, information‑exchange schemes, or resolutions encouraging boycotts. They can infringe by object or by effect and need not be binding; a recommendation that tends to align members’ behaviour can suffice. Liability can attach to the association and, in some cases, its members; competition authorities (European Commission, CMA and, in Ireland, the CCPC) may impose fines and remedies, and follow‑on damages claims may arise. Across England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland the concept mirrors EU law; in Ireland Article 101 TFEU and section 4 apply directly. Post-Brexit, Article 101 applies where EU trade is affected; UK Chapter I applies to UK effects.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Practice Notes about Decisions of associations of undertakings

PRACTICE NOTES
Merger control in Pakistan: thresholds, notification, review timelines, joint ventures, foreign-to-foreign, fees, penalties and recent CCP developments

Prepared in collaboration with Bilal Shaukat, partner, and Shahbakht Pirzada, associate partner, at Pakistani law firm RIAA Barker Gillette, on key issues concerning merger control in Pakistan. Note—to check whether notification thresholds in Pakistan and across the globe are satisfied, see Where to Notify. 1. Have there been any recent developments regarding the Pakistani merger control regime and are any updates/developments expected in the coming year? Are there any other ‘hot’ merger control issues in Pakistan? The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) has recently issued the Competition Exemption Regulations 2020 (2020 Regulations). These Regulations set out the procedure for seeking an exemption from a prohibited agreement. The Competition Act 2010 (the Act) forbids undertakings and associations of undertakings from entering into prohibited agreements. Prohibited agreements—or, for associations of undertakings, decisions—concern the production, distribution, acquisition or control of goods, or the supply of services, whose object or effect is the prevention, restriction or reduction of competition in the relevant market...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
UK VABEO 2022: Scope, Safe Harbour, Hardcore/Excluded Restrictions (RPM, Online, Parity, Non-competes), Dual Distribution, CMA Powers, and DMCC 2024 Extraterritorial Chapter I Context

Vertical agreements Under section 2(1) of the Competition Act 1998 (CA 98), vertical agreements are banned. The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 (DMCC Act) has revised the language in section 2 so that, in specified situations, it captures arrangements carried out beyond the UK. The prohibition covers agreements between undertakings, concerted practices, and decisions of associations of undertakings that have as their object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition within the UK, or any part of it, and which may influence trade in the UK or a part of it where such agreements, decisions or practices are implemented, or intended to be implemented, in the UK. In all other instances, the ban extends to conduct likely to have an immediate, substantial and foreseeable impact on trade within the UK or a part of the UK. In addition, section 2(3) CA 98 requires that an agreement is implemented, or intended to be implemented, in the UK. As indicated above, the DMCC Act adjusts the scope...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Concerted practices under Article 101 TFEU: definition, elements, 'by object'/'by effect' restrictions, evidence and key case law

The notion of concerted practice set out in Article 101(1) TFEU empowers the European Commission (Commission), national competition authorities, and national courts to forbid particular kinds of anti‑competitive conduct among undertakings that fall short of an agreement in this field. For an overview of Article 101(1) TFEU, see further, The prohibition on restrictive agreements, for present purposes. Concept of concerted practices: definition and underlying rationale Article 101 TFEU distinguishes between agreements between undertakings, decisions by associations of undertakings (which we do not address here), and concerted practices. An agreement presupposes that the parties subscribe to a common plan that restricts, or is liable to restrict, their independent commercial conduct by determining how they will act or refrain from acting on the market. By contrast, a concerted practice captures undertakings that knowingly engage in collusive behaviour to lessen uncertainty in the marketplace. Unlike an agreement, such collusion does not require the participants to commit to a common plan laying down their conduct in the market. It suffices that the...

Read More Right Arrow