Deferred member meaning

When does a section 75 debt arise? An s 75 liability crystallises in respect of an occupational pension scheme that is underfunded on a buy-out basis and: an employment-cessation event happens for a relevant participating employer within a multi-employer scheme an insolvency event occurs in relation to a participating employer of the scheme, or the scheme formally goes into winding up In a multi-employer scheme, an employer’s s 75 debt is its allocated share of the scheme deficit, appropriately assessed on a buy-out basis. As an alternative to immediately paying the s 75 debt in full, an employer may enter into a deferred debt arrangement, an apportionment arrangement, or a withdrawal arrangement. Section 75 does not apply at all to money purchase schemes, unregistered pension schemes, unfunded public sector schemes, and a scheme with only one member. ...

This Checklist offers an overview of the information an annual benefit statement must contain under regs 16, 16A and 17 of the Occupational and Personal Pension Schemes (Disclosure of Information) Regulations 2013, SI 2013/2734 (the Disclosure Regs 2013). It applies irrespective of whether the pension arrangement in question is a defined benefit scheme, a cash balance arrangement or any other money purchase set‑up. Benefit statements for benefits other than money purchase benefits Active, deferred and pension credit members who are entitled to benefits other than money purchase benefits (for example, final salary or career average benefits) may ask the trustees or managers of the scheme for a benefit statement once in every 12‑month period. The trustees must provide the statement as soon as practicable and, in any event, within two months of their request. The precise content of the annual benefit statement varies according to the member’s status, and the accompanying table identifies the information requirements for benefit statements for each relevant type of member...

The Prudential Assurance Company Ltd v HMRC [2024] EWCA Civ 300 The Prudential Assurance Company Ltd (Prudential) acted as the representative member of its VAT group. Another company in the group, Silverfleet Capital Ltd (SCL), executed an investment management services contract to provide services to Prudential. Under that contract, SCL was also eligible for a management fee and deferred performance fees once a specified hurdle rate was achieved. Under section 43 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 (VATA 1994), no VAT was payable on the management fee because they were in the same VAT group. In 2007, SCL exited the VAT group. In 2014 and 2015, the triggers for paying the further deferred performance fee were satisfied and SCL invoiced Prudential for over £9m in total. The question before the Court of Appeal was whether those additional performance fees ultimately constituted consideration for a supply made while both companies were members of the same VAT group or, alternatively, whether the services amounted to a continuous supply of services...

Original news Mr R (CAS-63400-N0T9) – 21 October 2024. Summary The Deputy Pensions Ombudsman dismissed a grievance concerning a transfer into a pension liberation arrangement. It was considered inappropriate to assess the decision through the lens of hindsight. The 2013 ‘Scorpion’ guidance post-dated the transfer by two years and therefore did not apply anyway. The Scheme undertook suitable, robust and proportionate due diligence consistent with industry practice at the time. This outcome confirms the Pensions Ombudsman does not make retrospective judgements in such circumstances. What were the facts? Mr R held deferred status as a member in the Armed Forces Pension Scheme (the ‘Scheme’)...

In this issue: Pension Schemes Bill The Pensions Regulator Financial Conduct Authority Daily and weekly news alerts Dates for your diary Trackers Pension Schemes Bill Bill amendments agreed in Report Stage of the House of Lords On 16, 19 and 23 March 2026, notable changes (including non-government proposals) were agreed to the Pension Schemes Bill, most prominently scrapping the reserve power to dictate how certain schemes invest their assets, whilst preserving the broader framework on scheme scale. The Lords also set out a fresh regulatory exemption from scale obligations, permitting schemes to forgo consolidation where it would not enhance member outcomes, together with new duties on the government to factor in innovation and competition when drafting regulations. Other agreed amendments include: confirming that the guided retirement duty extends to deferred members as well as active members and pensioners adding a new chapter to the PSB on the Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE) Pension...

A risk with employment cessation events is that they can be set off unintentionally, for example because the last remaining active member of an employer in a multi-employer defined benefit scheme has left. The Employer Debt Regulations, SI 2005/678 were amended with effect from 6 April 2008 to introduce grace periods, a device intended to help employers deal with accidental employment cessation events. For further information on employment cessation events and other section 75 triggers, see Practice Note: When is a section 75 debt triggered? When can a grace period be used? When can a grace period be used? An employer in a multi-employer defined benefit scheme may notify the trustees that it wishes to enter a grace period (by giving a grace period notice) if: that employer ceases to employ active members at a time when at least one other employer still employs active members, thereby creating an employment cessation event, and it intends to employ at least one individual who is an...

ESPS (ESPS) is a trust-based arrangement created by an Electricity Council resolution on 20 January 1983 as an industry-wide pension for employees of the nationalised electricity sector. It remained a single scheme at privatisation on 31 March 1990, after which it was divided into separate sections or ‘Groups’. The rules are not publicly accessible. For further information on statutory protections for ESPS members following privatisation, see Practice Note: —Protected Persons. Each principal electricity company participating in the ESPS forms its own Group; there are currently 23 Groups. Some Groups have a single participating employer, while others have several. Each Group is actuarially independent, with its assets and liabilities assessed on a standalone basis... Although a common scheme-wide benefit structure applied at the point of privatisation, since then each Group has been able to offer different benefits to its members. The ESPS rules comprise a central set of clauses and provisions governing matters that apply across the scheme, with Group-specific rules appended as Schedules. This Practice Note outlines the...

Statutory framework At present, four principal pension schemes operate in England and Wales for members of the armed forces. These are: Armed Forces Pension Scheme 1975 (AFPS 1975) — formerly open only to the regular forces; closed to new members from 6 April 2006 and stopped future accrual from 1 April 2022 Armed Forces Pension Scheme 2005 (AFPS 2005) — likewise for the regular forces only; also closed to future accrual from 1 April 2022 Reserve Forces Pension Scheme 2005 (RFPS 2005) — open to full time reservists; again closed to future accrual from 1 April 2022 Armed Forces Pension Scheme 2015 (AFPS 2015) — open to the regular forces and all reservists; effective from 1 April 2015 There are also several other schemes, run by the same manager, that provide pension or other occupational benefits to armed forces personnel. This Practice Note focuses on AFPS 2015. The AFPS 2015 was established under section...

To: the [ active AND/OR deferred AND/OR pensioner ] members [ (the “Members”) ] of the [ insert name of pension scheme ] [ (the “Scheme”) ] From: The trustees of the Scheme Date: [ Insert date sent to members ] The Pensions Act 2004 (the “2004 Act”) and the Pensions Regulator’s General Code of Practice (the “General Code of Practice”) require occupational pension schemes to have arrangements ensuring that at least one third of trustees are nominated by members, unless the Scheme is exempt under legislation. Background Consistent with the 2004 Act and the General Code of Practice, the trustee [ s ] of the Scheme (the “Trustees”) invite nominations from those eligible to nominate for [ insert number of member-nominated trustees sought ] new member-nominated trustee roles. The current position The Scheme is currently constituted by [ insert total number of trustees ] trustees, comprising [ insert number of MNTs ] trustees nominated by the Members (the...

To: the [ Active AND/OR Deferred AND/OR Pensioner ] Members (“[ the Members ]”) of the [ insert name pension scheme ] [ “the Scheme” ] From: The Scheme’s Trustees Date: [ Insert date sent to members ] Background In accordance with the Pensions Act 2004 (PeA 2004) and the Pension Regulator’s General Code of Practice (“the General Code of Practice”), occupational pension schemes must have arrangements ensuring that at least one third of trustees are nominated by members, unless the Scheme is exempt under legislation. The General Code of Practice states that the MNT arrangement should include a mechanism for periodic review to confirm whether it remains suitable for the Scheme, with such reviews to occur every three to five years. The General Code of Practice also indicates that the arrangement should be reassessed whenever there is a material change to the Scheme’s circumstances and/or its membership...