Delay meaning

Test for delay A stay is an exceptional measure, invoked only as a last resort. The court will stay proceedings only if it is satisfied, on the balance of probabilities, that delay means a fair trial cannot take place. In this context, two principal bases can justify a stay: the defendant can no longer have a fair trial it is not fair for the defendant to be tried at all The burden is on the defendant to show, on the balance of probabilities, that a fair trial is no longer achievable. Even if delay is proved, the judge retains a discretion to refuse a stay where the trial’s fairness can be protected by appropriate case management...

For further information on the principal designer’s responsibilities and remit, consult the following: Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015, SI 2015/51 (CDM Regs 2015) HSE Guidance on the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 CONIAC Industry guidance for Principal Designers Practice Note: CDM Regulations 2015—the role of the principal designer Appointment of the principal designer On any project involving more than one contractor, the client is required to appoint the principal designer formally and in writing. This appointment should be made as soon as practicable and, in any case, before the construction phase begins, without delay...

This flowchart outlines the steps in a disciplinary process addressing suspected employee misconduct: from fact-finding into the allegation(s), through holding a disciplinary meeting and deciding any sanction, to administering an appeal. Click below to open or print the full-size PDF version: Note 1—dealing with an allegation of misconduct When assessing whether the matter amounts to possible misconduct, it may also be necessary to examine the employee’s contract, the employer’s staff handbook and any other applicable policies or procedures beyond the disciplinary/dismissal procedure, for example an equality/equal opportunities policy or an expenses policy. Remember that a situation that initially appears to be misconduct could instead be a performance or capability issue. See Practice Note: Managing conduct—Dealing with conduct issues. Where a conduct issue arises, the first step is to investigate promptly and without undue delay to establish the facts of the case. Note 2—using mediation In appropriate circumstances, mediation may be considered as part of, or in parallel with, the disciplinary process. If both parties agree to...

This flowchart outlines the method for assessing whether or not a defendant possesses a criminal lifestyle, for the purposes of confiscation proceedings pursuant to the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002...

Legal Issues General comments This Checklist highlights the principal provisions and matters to consider when drafting and negotiating time of the essence clauses. What to watch out for For a Precedent time of the essence clause with comprehensive drafting notes, see Precedent: Time of the essence clause. For guidance on time of the essence, the exceptions to the general rule, and practical considerations for customers and suppliers, see Practice Note: Time of the essence. Nature of the term: condition, innominate term or warranty Time is of the essence where the parties expressly state that time will be of the essence. If time is of the essence, delay may entitle a party to terminate the contract and to claim damages. Without express wording, time will be of the essence only if it is a condition of the contract. Where the timing provision is interpreted as an innominate term or a warranty, the remedy is generally confined to damages, unless the breach is very serious or...

The flowchart below summarises the key steps required in order for an employer to be able to claim or deduct liquidated damages under the JCT Design and Build Contract 2024 While it concentrates on liquidated damages for delay in finishing the Works, the identical procedure equally applies to cases of late completion of a Section. Importantly, under the JCT Design and Build Contract 2024, if the contract ends before the Works are complete, the Employer may recover liquidated damages only up to the termination date, and general damages for any ensuing delay thereafter, rather than further liquidated damages for that period instead. For details, refer to Practice Note: JCT contracts—time—Liquidated damages and termination...

In this issue Key DR developments Claims and remedies Costs and funding Litigation Applications—general Evidence and disclosure Appeals New content Dates for your diary Useful information Daily and weekly news alerts Key DR developments CPR Committee minutes Minutes of the CPR Committee meeting—6 June 2025: The Civil Procedure Rule Committee met on 6 June 2025 in a hybrid session at The Rolls Building (Royal Courts of Justice) and via video conference. The minutes confirm a forthcoming CPR 51 pilot enabling non-parties to obtain court documents, arising from the Supreme Court ruling in Cape Intermediate Holdings Ltd v Dring [2019] UKSC 38. They also record approved amendments to the e‑working pilot, progressing towards a permanent electronic filing system as part of ongoing court modernisation. Further topics included summary assessment of costs, arbitration updates, disclosure, civil restraint orders, closed material procedures, judicial review reforms for infrastructure projects, whiplash reforms, digital services and other procedural...

What are the most significant changes introduced by the Act that pension scheme trustees need to prepare for? The most notable reforms in the Act that trustees should be ready for are: Data subject complaints: complaints about the handling of personal data must be acknowledged within 30 days and answered without undue delay. ICO enforcement powers: the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) now has authority to compel interviews and require the production of documents to assess compliance. Data subject access requests (DSARs): the Act codifies the ICO’s existing guidance, meaning (i) trustees must apply a ‘reasonable and proportionate’ search standard when responding; and (ii) the ‘stop the clock’ rule pauses the one-month deadline for a response. Automated decision making (ADM): the Act allows reliance on the full set of lawful bases — including ‘legitimate interests’ — when non-special category personal data is used for significant automated decisions about an individual, provided suitable safeguards are in place. ...

Laudamotion GmbH v flightright GmbH, Case C-474/22, ECLI-EU-C-2024-73 What are the practical implications of this case? In Laudamotion GmbH v flightright GmbH (Case C-474/22; ECLI-EU-C-2024-73), the consequences for air passengers covered by Regulation (EC) No 261/2004, the Air Passenger Rights Regulation (the ‘Regulation’), are far-reaching. Air passengers often find themselves already informed that a flight will run three hours late. Such delays are routine within aviation and may stem from technical problems with the aeroplane, strikes, or any other cause. When, because of that known delay, an air passenger no longer wishes to travel—whether because they know they will miss their meeting, as occurred in the dispute, or for any other reason—it is perfectly ordinary for them not to go to the gate to check in; and, where the delay is flagged much sooner, not even to set off for the airport for a flight they do not plan to take. The practical stakes for those within the scope of the Regulation are therefore considerable. Such disruption may...

Resource Note This Resource Note signposts key commentary, analysis and materials to aid interpretation and offer practical direction on using Chapter 2 of the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules (DTR 2). Where relevant, it draws on: the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) Handbook FCA Knowledge Base—Procedural and Technical notes (formal guidance binding on the FCA) FCA consultation and discussion papers, policy and feedback statements, and warnings Primary Market Bulletins and other FCA publications legacy UKLA technical and procedural notes and the UKLA’s newsletter List!, where still pertinent assimilated EU legislation EU Directives and EU Regulations, where helpful to construing a provision Lexis+® UK analysis and resources Setting the scene What it covers: DTR 2 prescribes the framework for issuers to disclose and manage inside information, supporting timely and even-handed release of market-sensitive information. It also identifies specific situations permitting a delay to public disclosure of inside information, together with the safeguards required to keep such information...

This year’s annual round-up surveys key developments from 2017 and sets out what is on the horizon for 2018. It covers: the decision to relocate the European Medicines Agency the delay to implementing the new Clinical Trials Regulation preparations for the new Medical Devices Regulations the Life Sciences Sector Deal the forthcoming application of the General Data Protection Regulation the introduction of the Accelerated Access Pathway It also includes updates on Lexis®+ UK’s content, highlighting notable developments from the past year and what is coming in the next 12 months. Reviewing 2017 Brexit What happened? On 20 November 2017, Amsterdam was selected as the new home of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) following Brexit. What are the practical implications? The move of the European medicines regulator from London to Amsterdam has several practical implications. To begin with, EMA operations will be affected as staff are reassigned to prepare for the relocation, and as...

THIS PRACTICE NOTE APPLIES ONLY TO DEFINED BENEFIT OCCUPATIONAL PENSION SCHEMES When performing its functions, the Determinations Panel of the Pensions Regulator follows two distinct procedural pathways that must be observed, and must be followed at all times. These two sequences are known as the Standard Procedure and the Special Procedure. the Standard Procedure the Special Procedure As a reserved regulatory function of the Pensions Regulator, issuing a contribution notice or a financial support direction may only be carried out by the Determinations Panel using the Standard Procedure. The Special Procedure is adopted where there is a need to invoke the Regulator’s powers without delay to safeguard members’ interests or scheme assets. This route does not extend to contribution notices or financial support directions. For more detail on the Special Procedure, see The Pensions Regulator’s Determinations Panel—The Regulator’s procedures for exercising its functions. For additional information about the Panel, see Practice Note: The Pensions Regulator’s Determinations Panel. Stages of...

The Contract comprises the completed Standard Building Contract Without Quantities for use in Scotland 2016 published by the SBCC subject to the following amendments: Recitals and Articles updated: contractor to provide a master programme and Schedule of Information Requirements; CDP responsibility accepted; Principal Contractor duties priced; arbitration deleted; Schedule of Amendments prevails; Third Party Agreements duties. Contract Particulars: arbitration entries removed; Rectification Period set at 12 months; fluctuations and certain PII/guarantee entries deleted. Conditions: key definitions revised (Practical Completion, Copyright Material, Design sub‑contractors, Funder, Site); Scottish jurisdiction; approvals mean principles only; entire agreement; variations in writing. Design/materials/programming: contractor accepts ER/CP; quality and non‑deleterious materials; programme reporting; site risk; drawings/info supply; tighter discrepancy notices. Time/defects: mitigate and advise on delay; narrower Relevant Events; Practical Completion clarified; stronger rectification, consequential damage and indemnity; phased as‑built/occupation information. IP/confidentiality/BIM: broader licence, moral rights waivers and delivery; confidentiality reinforced; BIM where adopted. Management/sub‑contracting: access, approved Site Manager, meetings; prescribed sub‑contracts; collateral warranties/third‑party rights; CDM duties; insurance...

1 General information Date complaint received [ Enter date ] How was the complaint received? ☐ Email ☐ Letter ☐ In person ☐ Telephone ☐ Other—[ please specify ] When replying to the complainant, choose the most appropriate communication method. Date complaint acknowledged [ Enter a date that should be 30 days from the date you received the complaint. ] Proposed deadline for responding to complaint [ Enter a date that meets the expectation that you will handle the complaint without any delay. ] Person investigating complaint and completing this record [ Provide details of the individual who investigated the complaint and completed this report. This could be your data protection officer. ] Date of report [ Enter date ] 2 Complainant Name of data subject ...

This Agreement is entered into on [ insert date ] (the Commencement Date) by and between: Parties [ insert supplier name ], a company incorporated in England and Wales, whose registered number is [ insert company number ] and whose registered office is at [ insert registered office ] (Supplier); and [ insert customer name ], a company incorporated in England and Wales, whose registered number is [ insert company number ] and whose registered office is at [ insert registered office ] (Customer). Each of the Supplier and the Customer is a party, and together the Supplier and the Customer are the parties. Background The Supplier is [ an experienced software developer and ] [ insert the Supplier’s background details and the background to the relevant transaction ]. The Customer is [ insert the Customer’s background details ]. Subject to this Agreement, the Supplier shall develop software for the Customer and will licence (or arrange...

If an employer appoints a utility co-ordinator to supervise and arrange utility connections with Statutory Undertakers, would this alter status of Statutory Undertakers, as set out in clause 2.26.6 of JCT Design & Build Contract?...

Damages After the lease ends, a landlord’s terminal dilapidations claim lies in damages. The recoverable sum is determined by common law rules for assessing loss arising from breach of the repairing covenant, but is curtailed by the statutory ceiling in section 18(1) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1927 (LTA 1927). At common law, the benchmark for disrepair is the reasonable expenditure required to restore the premises to the condition they should have been in at the point of lease expiry. The claim for damages may, in addition, encompass foreseeable knock-on losses, including rent foregone during any period when the state of disrepair prevents the property being relet...

Clause 2.27.1 of the JCT Standard Building Contract 2011 (SBC) Clause 2.27.1 provides that where it becomes reasonably clear that progress of the Works, or any Section, is delayed or likely to be delayed, the Contractor must at once notify the Architect/Contract Administrator, explaining the material circumstances, including the reasons for the delay, and in that notice point out any occurrence he regards as a Relevant Event... Lexis+® UK practical point: the same wording appears in the Standard Building Contract 2016 (cl 2.27.1) and in the JCT Design and Build Contract 2011/2016 (cl 2.24.1), save that in the design and build forms the addressee ‘Architect/Contract Administrator’ is replaced by the ‘Employer’... Two principal questions arise when deciding whether a notification clause such as SBC clause 2.27.1 has been properly observed: what does the obligation to give notice ‘forthwith’ encompass, and is the contractor obliged to meet this condition? what level of notification/particulars of the ‘material circumstances’ must be provided? ...