Discount rate meaning

PI & Clinical Negligence weekly highlights—7 March 2024 In this issue: Clinical negligence Fraud and fundamental dishonesty Damages Case management Costs Key PI & Clinical Negligence developments LexTalk®PI & Clinical Negligence: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts Clinical negligence Administrative Court dismisses appeal in clinical negligence claim The King’s Bench Division Administrative Court (Birmingham), in Chilton v Payne [2024] EWHC 451 (Admin), rejected the appellant’s appeal against an order dismissing her claim for damages against the respondent surgeon for negligence. The case concerned an alleged omission by the respondent to provide, or ensure, sufficient abdominoplasty follow-up and/or aftercare. She maintained, among other grounds, that the judge had erred in fact and in law: (i) in concluding there was no breach of the post-operative duty of care; and (ii) in his treatment of factual causation. On appeal, the court affirmed that the judge was right to find no duty on the respondent to...

UK Care No 1 Ltd v HMRC [2024] UKFTT 542 (TC) The FTT examined the operation of the ‘imported losses’ restriction contained in CTA 2009, s 327. Under that code, relief for a loss arising on a loan relationship is denied to the extent the loss is properly referable to a period during which the company attempting to bring it into account would not have been chargeable to corporation tax on any profits from that same loan relationship. The appellant, which was tax resident in Guernsey, had issued certain loan notes that were secured over the BUPA group’s UK care home undertaking. In 2016, BUPA sought to sell a number of care homes that constituted part of the security package supporting the notes. To enable those transactions to proceed, BUPA acquired the appellant, with the result that the appellant became UK tax resident, following which the notes were redeemed by the appellant itself. The loan notes incorporated a ‘Spens’ (or ‘make whole’) provision; broadly, this meant that on an...

In this issue: Road traffic accidents Damages Costs Other PI & Clinical negligence news Daily and weekly news alerts Road traffic accidents Automated Vehicles Act 2024 This Act sets the framework for the use of automated vehicles on highways and in other public spaces, and makes additional provision relating to vehicle automation. It took effect in part on 20 May 2024, and will be commenced in full on a date to be named by Regulations made by the Secretary of State. See: LNB News 23/05/2024 17. Damages MoJ publishes PIDR expert panel meeting minutes for April 2024 The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has issued the minutes of the Personal Injury Discount Rate (PIDR) expert panel meeting held on 25 April 2024...

PI & Clinical negligence horizon scanner—July 2025 [Archived] ARCHIVED: This Practice Note is archived and is not maintained. It summarises the principal legal developments relevant to personal injury and clinical negligence practitioners as at July 2025. For developments predating this horizon scanner, see PI and Clinical Negligence horizon scanning and key cases—overview. Key PI and clinical negligence developments The personal injury discount rate—a review In late 2024, the Lord Chancellor, Shabana Mahmood MP, revealed the outcome of her five‑month review of the discount rate, initiated in July 2024. One month after the new +0.5% discount rate took effect, Thea Wilson (barrister at 12 King’s Bench Walk) assesses its impact on cases, the responses from claimant and defendant representatives, and the consequences of the change for legal practitioners. See News Analysis: The personal injury discount rate—a review. MoJ announces reduction in CFO’s interest rates The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has announced lower interest rates for the Courts Funds Office’s (CFO) special and basic accounts...

This Practice Note examines methods for valuing law firms and sets out the elements most prone to shape that assessment. Although several conventional approaches exist, it offers a worked illustration of an earnings-led valuation (discounted economic income). Investors commonly adopt this approach when pricing a company and, therefore, it is a vital computation to undertake before starting any talks. The outcome might be below your expectations, yet it provides a window into the sum an investor or acquirer could be prepared to offer. The discounted economic value model In brief, this model projects a firm’s future net cash profits and discounts them to today’s value. By applying an appropriate discount rate, it seeks to reflect the spectrum of risks the business encounters in generating that earnings flow over time. The exercise, therefore, converts anticipated cash returns across multiple years into a single current figure that recognises uncertainty, timing, and sustainability in the delivery of the net income stream...

National non-domestic rates (NNDR) This Practice Note sits within a broader series on NNDR. It sets out the legislative framework for billing and recovery, explains the collection fund, and outlines transitional reliefs and exemptions operating within the system, addressing periods both before and after the pandemic. For more on other facets of the NNDR scheme, see the following Practice Notes: National non-domestic rates—valuation and appeals National non-domestic rates—business improvement district, business rate supplements and retention Liability for business rates Currently, local authorities collectively keep half of business rates income. The remainder is paid to central government, which then uses it to fund grants for local authorities. For the 2023–24 financial year, authorities project non-domestic rating income of £25.1bn—representing what they expect to collect after allowing for all reliefs, accounting adjustments and amounts retained outside the rates retention scheme. They also estimate awarding £7bn in business rates relief during 2023–24...

Schedule of loss & dependency in a fatal accident claim [ IN THE COUNTY COURT AT [ INSERT ] OR IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE ] [ [ Specify division ] ] [ [ Insert location ] DISTRICT REGISTRY ] Claim No: Between AB, Claimant (the Widow and Executrix of the estate of A, deceased) and C Limited, Defendant Note On 2 December 2024 the Lord Chancellor confirmed that the discount rate would move to a positive 0.5%. That positive 0.5% rate takes effect from 11 January 2025. Under Schedule A1 to the Damages Act 1996, later reviews must occur within five years of the end of the previous review, meaning the next review must begin on or before 2 December 2029. The Claimant retains the right to revise, modify or supplement this schedule at any time up to and including trial...

[ AT THE COUNTY COURT AT [ INSERT ] OR IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE ] [ [ SPECIFY DIVISION ] ] [ DISTRICT REGISTRY AT [ INSERT LOCATION ] ] Claim No: Between [ Insert name ] Claimant and [ Insert name ] Defendant ________________________________________________ SCHEDULE OF LOSS CALCULATED TO [ INSERT DATE OR INSERT THE DATE OF TRIAL ] ________________________________________________ Note On 2 December 2024, the Lord Chancellor declared that the discount rate would move to positive 0.5%. This positive 0.5% rate comes into effect on 11 January 2025. Schedule A1 to the Damages Act 1996 stipulates that later reviews are to occur within five years of the end of the preceding review, which means the next review must start on or before 2 December 2029. The Claimant reserves the ability to revise, amend, or supplement this schedule at any point up to and including trial. A....

What is a DCFA? Most practitioners know the ‘pure’ CFA, commonly referred to as a ‘no win, no fee’ agreement. Working under a pure CFA, the lawyer or legal representative is remunerated only upon a win, as the CFA expressly defines it. If that outcome is not achieved, no fee is payable for the professional work undertaken on the matter. For additional detail, see the subtopic: CFAs and DBAs for further information. A DCFA is often described as a ‘no win, lower fee’ arrangement in contrast to the pure CFA. Under a DCFA, the client agrees to meet the lawyer’s fees in full on success; if the case fails, a reduced fee is payable to the representative. The role of success fees Success fees exist to ensure a solicitor’s portfolio of CFA-backed litigation can operate at nil net loss overall. Put differently, the success uplifts on winning matters are designed to meet the base costs that cannot be recovered on losing matters within that portfolio...