Disposal meaning

Basic terms At the outset, assess whether overage suits the transaction. Your client might be better protected by agreeing a higher purchase price or by entering into a conditional contract instead. Overage provisions can be intricate and expensive to negotiate. If overage is to be applied, consider when the seller expects or hopes to receive a further payment and how the buyer could avoid activating the overage. Ensure the overage includes clear definitions of: the overage period (note that, from 6 April 2010, the rule against perpetuities does not apply to most commercial interests and, if no overage period is specified, there is a risk the arrangement could be perpetual) the property that will be subject to the overage any individual units to be sold or constructed, making clear whether parking spaces and other ancillary areas form part of a unit for the overage calculation Include a ‘good faith’ clause, as this may help if the buyer does something unexpected to...

Use this checklist when representing the seller in the disposal of a registered freehold residential property, whether offered with vacant possession or burdened by a lease or multiple leases. It is not comprehensive and will not address every eventuality in every transaction. You should always consider if there are additional matters that require attention. It does not purport to be a complete guide for every case. Preliminary matters Have you taken instructions from the client? Robust due diligence and effective transaction management depend on a clear grasp of the seller’s objectives and the proposed sale terms. Obtain full instructions, and clarify any elements of your brief that are unclear or out of the ordinary. Consider whether further specialist input is required; for example, planning advice where completion is conditional upon planning permission being secured. The table below sets out some of the principal points on which instructions should be obtained at the outset. This list is not comprehensive, and you may need to request information about additional...

This checklist summarises the actions to undertake and the matters to weigh up when the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (TUPE 2006), SI 2006/246 are engaged on a business disposal or a change in service provision, where appropriate. It additionally flags up the pertinent Practice Notes and Precedent materials. It is not produced for clients, though it can be tailored for them if required. See also the following TUPE-related checklists: What transfers under TUPE, and who is liable—checklist Pension issues on a TUPE transfer—checklist Checklist—immigration-related requirements on a TUPE transfer Drafting a tripartite settlement agreement—checklist Legal background For a summary of TUPE 2006’s general effect and obligations, consult TUPE and asset purchases—overview. Obtain essential information Pin down exactly what is being transferred or contracted out (this could be a business, a business unit, or another economic activity) and how that will be described in the relevant operative documentation, as necessary. See Practice Notes:...

During any due diligence for acquiring a lease that is itself an underlease, a purchaser ought to carefully evaluate: whether the superior lease could be forfeited or ended on the operation of a break clause—this may negatively affect the leasehold’s value and the prospects of disposal or funding as well as the ability to sell on or secure finance against it whether the covenants in the superior lease and the underlease align—the purchaser might assume far more burdensome duties because of a requirement to observe strictly in practice the superior lease covenants under the underlease whether the grant of the underlease has, in substance, operated as an assignment of the superior lease In this Checklist, references to the underlease mean simply the lease being acquired, and references to the superior lease mean the lease from which the underlease was granted. Is there any obligation to comply with superior lease covenants?...

The Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 (LTA 1987), Part I Under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 (LTA 1987), Part I, qualifying tenants of flats have a right of pre-emption (the right of first refusal), enabling them to acquire their landlord’s interest when the landlord intends to dispose of it. A landlord may not make a relevant disposal without first serving notice on the qualifying tenants, and if, having confirmed the tenants do not wish to exercise that right on the stated terms, any allowed disposal must not proceed on terms more favourable than those originally offered to the tenants. Should the tenants accept the landlord’s offer, a statutory process then governs completion of the disposal. Click here to download a PDF version of the flowchart:...

Risk management lifecycle flowchart This risk management lifecycle flowchart outlines a method to identify, evaluate, and handle risks across your organisation...

In this issue: Air emissions and climate change Energy efficiency of products Energy for environmental lawyers ESG and sustainability Hazardous substances and chemicals Marine Nature, biodiversity and habitat conservation Waste Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Air emissions and climate change Defra opens consultation on industrial emissions permitting reforms The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) has begun consulting on plans to modernise England’s environmental permitting regime for industrial emissions. The package aims to foster innovation, adopt agile standards, secure proportionate and coherent regulation, boost regulator effectiveness and efficiency, and deliver a transparent system. Suggested measures include a new registration route for low-risk installations, flexible site permits setting overall emissions caps, and faster approvals for time‑limited technology trials. The proposals reflect the Corry Review’s critique of regulatory inefficiency. The Environment Agency intends to roll out changes that could cut permit queues from months to days and lower...

The US Department of Justice (DOJ) under the Trump administration has signalled it will deploy every instrument at its disposal—including the FCPA and the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA)—to go after such targets. What, then, should compliance professionals understand about where FCPA and ATA risks intersect? At face value, the FCPA and ATA seem to address separate exposures: the FCPA tackles bribery of overseas officials, whereas the ATA centres on, among other matters, supplying material support to, or aiding and abetting, foreign terrorist organisations (FTOs). In reality, though, these hazards can collide—especially in markets with significant FTO presence—producing concurrent exposure. Background On 20 January 2025, President Donald Trump signed Executive Order No 14157, directing, among other measures, that specified international cartels and other transnational criminal organisations (TCOs) be classified as FTOs. Since February 2025, the US State Department has designated 11 organisations—primarily in Latin America—as FTOs. These listings carry meaningful consequences: the ATA imposes broad civil and criminal liability for furnishing material support to FTOs, and permits asset forfeiture...

In this issue: Taxes management and litigation VAT Real estate taxes Oil and gas taxation Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Useful information Taxes management and litigation FTT upholds penalties for invalid BADR claims (Cox and another v HMRC) As outlined below, in Cox and another v HMRC [2024] UKFTT 510 (TC), the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) rejected the taxpayers’ appeals against penalties arising from defective entrepreneurs’ relief claims, now termed business asset disposal relief (BADR). The FTT decided the claimants failed to exercise reasonable care when making the claims, and that HMRC’s choice not to suspend the penalties was not erroneous. See News Analysis: FTT upholds penalties for invalid BADR claims (Cox and another v HMRC). VAT FTT confirms dip pot formed part of single supply of takeaway food subject to VAT (Queenscourt Limited v HMRC) As previously noted in a Tax...

The extended producer responsibility (EPR) regime for packaging and packaging waste The extended producer responsibility (EPR) regime for packaging and packaging waste shifts the entire cost of managing household packaging waste from households to packaging producers, placing on them accountability for their packaging costs throughout its lifecycle. Lower charges apply to sustainable packaging, incentivising designs that use fewer materials and are easier to recycle. Under EPR, Local Authorities (LAs) receive producer-funded payments covering the net costs of collecting, managing, recycling and disposing of this household packaging waste. EPR is governed by the Producer Responsibility Obligations (Packaging and Packaging Waste) Regulations 2024, SI 2024/1332 (as amended). These regulations define a range of persons and bodies with specific functions within the regime. These are: producers—these are the principal duty holders compliance schemes the Scheme Administrator (SA) (PackUK) ‘relevant authorities’ which are LAs as household waste collection and disposal authorities responsible for household waste services reprocessors and exporters the ‘appropriate agency’—in England, the Environment...

Stop Press : From accounting periods starting on or after 1 January 2026, the Diverted Profits Tax is superseded by the unassessed transfer pricing profits rules. This Practice Note, alongside Transactions in UK land—tax rules, examines the anti-avoidance provisions aimed at countering attempts to sidestep tax on income, profits or gains connected with arrangements concerning, or trades of dealing in, land. The main anti-avoidance measure seeks to treat gains of a capital character realised on the disposal of land as income, bringing them within income tax or corporation tax. Further detail appears in Practice Note: Transactions in UK land—tax rules. From 5 July 2016 these rules superseded and expanded the former transactions in land rules (for information on prior rules, see Practice Note: Real estate—anti-avoidance: disposals of land and taxing capital gains as income (pre 5 July 2016) [Archived])...

Trustees and personal representatives can, in fact, carry on a trade. For example, where a self-employed trader dies, the personal representative may keep the business running until it is wound down or sold. In the same way, trustees or interest in possession beneficiaries might be trading and could qualify for reliefs such as roll-over relief or business asset disposal relief. The broad tax rules governing trading apply to all traders alike, whether they are individuals, trustees, or personal representatives. This Practice Note sets out those principles below. Is there a trade? The key issue to examine is whether there is a trade. At times this will be clear, for instance when personal representatives step in to continue the deceased’s business; however, in other situations even a solitary transaction can amount to a trade. As an illustration, trustees who buy a property to renovate may, depending on the circumstances, be regarded as operating a property development business. If so, any gain on the later sale would fall within income...

This Agreement is dated [ date ] Parties [ insert name of the pursuer ], a company registered in Scotland (no [ insert company number ]), whose [ registered office OR principal place of business ] is at [ insert address ] (the Pursuer) [ and ] [ ; ] [ insert name of defender ], a company registered in Scotland (no [ insert company number ]), whose [ registered office OR principal place of business ] is at [ insert address ] (the Defender). Each being a Party and, together, the Parties. Whereas (A) [ Insert details of the background to the dispute eg ‘The Parties entered into a contract for the supply of certain goods etc ]. (B) A dispute has emerged between the Parties regarding [ insert details of the dispute ] (the Dispute). (C) [ Proceedings were raised by the Pursuer against the Defender on [ date ] by way of [ Summons OR...

Date [ date ] Parties [ name of Seller ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Seller) [ name of Buyer ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Buyer) 1 Definitions Within this Deed, the terms below have the following meanings: Apportioned Price • an amount derived using the formula: (A/B) x C Where: ‘A’ is the gross area in [ acres OR hectares ] of the property included in the Current Disposal ‘B’ is the gross area in [ acres OR hectares ] of the Property in its entirety ‘C’ is the Purchase Price; Base Value • (a) where the Current Disposal is solely Untriggered Property: i the Purchase...

SPECIAL RESOLUTION[S] 1 THAT, if [ insert reference to the resolution granting authority to allot ] is approved, the Board shall be empowered to issue equity securities (as defined in the Companies Act 2006) for cash under the authority conferred by that resolution and/or to dispose of ordinary shares held by the Company in treasury for cash, as though section 561 of the Companies Act 2006 did not apply to any such issue or sale, such power to be restricted as follows: [ insert wording to limit the authority to disapply pre-emption rights to allotments for rights issues and other pre-emptive issues ]; to the issue of equity securities or the disposal of treasury shares (other than pursuant to paragraph (A) above) up to an aggregate nominal amount of £[ insert amount, to be not more than 10 per cent of the issued ordinary share capital (excluding treasury shares) of the Company as at the latest practicable date prior to publication of the notice of...

Section 2 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 (LTA 1987) Section 2 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 (LTA 1987) states that a person is the landlord if they are (a) the direct landlord of the qualifying tenants of flats in the premises, or (b) where any such tenant is a statutory tenant, the person who, but for that statutory tenancy, would have the right to possession of the flat. Consequently, the relevant landlord is usually the immediate landlord of the qualifying tenants, so a transfer of a superior interest is generally outside scope. Intermediate headleases are often used to avoid the regime. However, s 2(2) LTA 1987 provides that where the immediate landlord is also a tenant of the premises under a tenancy that is either: a term under seven years, or a term exceeding seven years, but capable of termination within the first seven years at the superior landlord’s option, the superior landlord is also treated as the...

Assignment of a lease The disposal of a lease is ordinarily handled in the same manner as conveying a freehold, and any sum or premium given for the assignment (excluding a reverse premium) falls within the scope of stamp duty land tax (SDLT). However, the incoming tenant’s acceptance of obligations under the lease—such as paying rent or complying with the tenant’s covenants—does not constitute chargeable consideration for SDLT purposes and is disregarded when assessing the tax charge...

When land is subject to a charitable trust, any disposal must comply with Part 7 of the Charities Act 2011 (CA 2011). Transactions involving charity land are governed by CA 2011, sections 117–123. The charity is required to show that the proposed disposal serves its best interests and that it is being carried out on the best terms that can reasonably be secured in full...