Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“It's hard to quantify, right now. But at a guess, I'd say it's probably more than 50% faster, at times. It's literally that quick. We've found to be an essential practical tool. We're very satisfied.”

Walsall Council

Access all documents on Disposing of patented invention

Disposing of patented invention meaning

Published by a LexisNexis IP expert
What does Disposing of patented invention mean?
Disposing of a patented invention describes selling or otherwise supplying a patented product, or a product made directly by a patented process, in the course of trade. In England & Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, this is a statutory concept: under section 60 of the Patents Act 1977, it is patent infringement to dispose of, offer to dispose of, use or import a patented product, or to keep it whether for disposal or otherwise. “Dispose of” covers sales and other transfers of ownership or possession (for example, supply or hire). An offer to dispose of can infringe even if no sale occurs. The same rules apply to products obtained directly by a patented process (product-by-process). In Ireland, the Patents Act 1992 uses equivalent language (such as offering, putting the product on the market, using, importing or stocking), and the practical effect is broadly the same. Key limits include exhaustion of rights: resale or other dealings with goods first put on the market by or with the patentee’s consent will not infringe (UK: EEA exhaustion policy; Ireland: EU/EEA exhaustion). Routine repair that does not amount to “making” is generally permissible; remanufacture is not. Territorial targeting of offers is relevant to infringement.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Practice Notes about Disposing of patented invention

PRACTICE NOTES
UK patent infringement under the Patents Act 1977: direct, indirect and contributory liability, claim construction and equivalents, second medical use, knowledge requirements, joint tortfeasance, and litigation essentials

This Practice Note examines direct, indirect and contributory patent infringement. It outlines how the Patents Act 1977 (PA 1977) characterises prohibited (ie infringing) conduct, including making a product or operating a process, and describes the way in which the courts assess whether that product or process falls within the claim scope. The Practice Note also considers core issues in infringement actions, including who may bring proceedings, appropriate timing, and the allocation of the burden of proof. Introduction to patent infringement To prove infringement of a patent, it must be shown that a prohibited (ie infringing) act has been carried out in relation to a product or process that lies within the patent’s scope. These components of infringement are explored in Infringing acts and How the courts decide whether a product or process falls within the scope of a patent below. Note too that certain acts are permitted and non-infringing (for example, those undertaken privately, for non-commercial ends, or for experimentation), alongside statutory defences to infringement. For fuller treatment,...

Read More Right Arrow