DPA meaning

Checklist Use this Checklist when assessing online advertising terms and conditions, where a publisher (the owner of a website, app or other digital platform) sells advertising space on its platforms to advertisers (brands or advertising/media buying agencies acting for those brands) on a direct basis (Programmatic Direct). Where appropriate, this Checklist may operate as the starting point for straightforward, non-binding heads of terms. For direction on preparing these, see Precedent: Heads of terms—commercial contracts. For a specimen set of a publisher’s standard terms, see Precedent: Online advertising terms and conditions. As you work through the Checklist, the third column can be used to note observations or comments. Employ it to record notes while progressing through each item. Further information Notes (if any) Parties ☐ Verify each party’s legal status and whether the advertiser will contract in its own capacity or via an advertising agency. In some situations an advertiser will enter into the agreement itself; in others, it may appoint an...

This is a Checklist of the main issues that an employer will need to consider when seeking a medical report on a prospective employee during the recruitment process: For what reason is the report required? Refer to Practice Note: Medical reports—data protection issues and AMRA 1988—Purposes of medical report Why must health details be collected, and what grounds justify requesting a medical report—is there a particular aspect of the post that demands it, or is it to gauge overall fitness for a challenging senior position? What scope should the report have—what does the prospective employer actually need to know, steering clear of intrusion where it is unnecessary or irrelevant? Could the employer limit the health data it handles by engaging an occupational health (OH) service or specialist? Who will have access to the report, at what stage, and for what use? Has an employment offer already been made? If not, does the aim of the report sit within the allowed situations under section...

This is a Checklist of the main issues that an employer will need to consider when seeking a medical report on a current employee during the employee’s employment: Clarify the objective of the report clearly. See Practice Note: Medical reports—data protection issues and AMRA 1988—Purposes of medical report. Explain why health information is required and set out the grounds for requesting a medical report—is there a defined element of the role that necessitates it, or is the aim to evaluate overall health, eg for a physically demanding post? Set the scope of the report—identify precisely what the employer needs to know, avoiding intrusion where it is not needed or relevant. Consider whether involving an occupational health (OH) professional or service could limit the volume of health data the employer processes. Specify who will have sight of the report, when they will see it, and for what purpose they will use it. Confirm who will prepare the report. ...

This diagram mirrors HMRC’s Flowchart 4, set out at paragraph 5.24 of the Guidance Note on residence, domicile and the remittance basis (RDR1). It is for use when a taxpayer clearly plans to depart the UK in the future...

Flowchart This Flowchart helps determine which stamp duty land tax (SDLT) provisions are relevant on a lease renewal where a tenant remains in occupation by ‘holding over’ after a fixed-term lease ends. It should be considered together with the fuller Practice Note: SDLT—holding over. The SDLT provisions governing situations where a tenant holds over a lease, and that lease is subsequently renewed, are intricate and often complex...

This diagram mirrors HMRC’s flowchart 1 in paragraph 5.24 of the Guidance Note on residence, domicile and the remittance basis, RDR1. It is designed to help taxpayers make an initial assessment regarding their domicile status...

Nick Ephgrave Nick Ephgrave acknowledged it was no secret that the SFO has witnessed a slight drop-off in the number of companies approaching the specialist anti-corruption body with suspected fraud and bribery within their organisation. To address this, the SFO intends to invest further in covert intelligence-gathering so it can better understand what is happening in corporate settings and, in turn, either pursue targets or encourage them to come forward, he told Law360 and reporters from other news outlets. Ephgrave said he wants to be more in control of the referrals received by an agency that largely depends on businesses volunteering information, with the aim of invigorating and provoking self-reporting by companies. He added that he is really seeking to drive up the number of corporates the SFO deals with, whether through self-reporting supported by revised corporate guidance, via intelligence from whistleblowers, or by relying on good old-fashioned covert policing techniques such as surveillance, the deployment of undercover officers, and the use of informants...

In this issue: Decision to prosecute and alternatives to prosecution Criminal procedure and evidence Proceeds of crime Appeals and judicial review Sentencing Bribery, corruption, sanctions and export controls Cybercrime and data protection offences Fraud, forgery, tax and theft offences Health and safety and corporate manslaughter offences Other corporate crime updates LexTalk®Corporate Crime: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Useful information Decision to prosecute and alternatives to prosecution Deferred Prosecution Agreements—an ‘expiry date’ or a ‘best before’? (Guralp Systems Ltd v Serious Fraud Office) The statutory framework for Deferred Prosecution Agreements (DPAs) requires an expiry date within every DPA, mandates that any breach application is made while the DPA remains in force, and provides that where a DPA lasts until its expiry, the proceedings are to be discontinued. In this case, the DPA’s terms specified effectiveness for...

How has the exemption available for controllers under the GDPR in relation to liability to compensate data subjects changed? Under the earlier Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC (Article 23(2)), where a person was entitled to damages from a controller due to unlawful processing, the controller could rely on a potential exemption if it was not responsible for the event that caused the loss. Recital 55 offered two illustrations of situations for which the controller would not bear responsibility: a mistake by the data subject, and a case of force majeure The language of these provisions lacked clarity, and the concept of ‘force majeure’ has no consistent definition across EU legal systems (it does not even carry a settled meaning in English law, depending heavily on contractual wording). Unsurprisingly, this carve-out, and the reference to force majeure, was therefore loosely carried across into national implementing legislation. For example, the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA 1998) gave a controller a defence in claims for compensation...

For guidance on what deferred prosecution agreements (DPAs) are and how they work, see Practice Note: Deferred prosecution agreements, which explains their operation. In what circumstances can a DPA be varied? The statutory power to amend a DPA sits squarely in paragraph 10 of Schedule 17 to the Crime and Courts Act 2013 (CCA 2013) itself. A DPA may require alteration in two situations: where the court invites the parties to vary the DPA under CCA 2013, Sch 17 Pt 1, para 9(3)(a), namely where the organisation has breached the agreement and the court wants the parties to put forward proposals to cure the organisation’s non-compliance, by agreement between the parties as invited by the court, accordingly (see Practice Notes: Financial penalties as a term of a DPA—Late payment and breach of a DPA and Breach of a DPA) where a variation is required to prevent the organisation failing to comply with its obligations in circumstances that were not, and could not reasonably...

As of 31 January 2020, the UK left the EU and the EEA. This Practice Note introduces: the General Data Protection Regulation, Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (EU GDPR) framework (which applied within UK law up to the end of the Brexit implementation period—11 pm UK time on 31 December 2020—and continues to operate across the EEA; therefore, any references in this Practice Note to EEA or EU states should be read as also covering the UK until that period concluded) the United Kingdom General Data Protection Regulation, Retained Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (UK GDPR) framework (which applies under UK law from the end of the Brexit implementation period) Where there is no need to draw a distinction, this Practice Note refers to both as ‘GDPR’ for ease. When looking at the routine processing of personal data, the UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA 2018) should be consulted together, as both sets of provisions have direct effect. Practitioners will generally...

This Practice Note This Practice Note offers a high-level overview of the data protection framework relevant to direct marketing, particularly how such activities may give rise to compliance obligations under the Assimilated Regulation (EU) 2016/679, the United Kingdom General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR), the Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA 2018) and the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 (PECR 2003), SI 2003/2426. It is aimed at commercial organisations in the UK, with further, scenario-specific guidance signposted. The main difficulty in direct marketing is determining what the UK GDPR and PECR 2003 permit and whether consent is needed, which will differ according to the activity undertaken and the audience targeted. This Practice Note reflects the following ICO guidance: Direct marketing guidance Direct marketing using live calls Making live marketing calls about claims management services Making live marketing calls about pension schemes Direct marketing using electronic mail Guide to PECR, cookies and similar technologies Guide to PECR, what counts...

1 Background information Assessment covering [ specify if the assessment applies to the entire organisation or a particular department ] Assessor [ insert name ] Assessment date [ insert date ] 2 Which personal data do you obtain and/or keep? Reflect on the personal data you receive and/or store, and identify any inherent risks. 2.1 Review Category of personal data Type of data How is it acquired? How is it stored?...

FORTHCOMING CHANGE: The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has issued draft guidance on recruitment and selection, which was open to consultation until 5 March 2024, and has also removed the employment practices code and its supplementary guidance from the employment information page. For further details, see Practice Note: The UK GDPR and DPA 2018: key data protection issues for employment lawyers—Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) guidance. This Precedent will be updated in due course. [ Insert name of organisation ] This notice sets out what personal data (information) we will hold about you, how we obtain it, and how we will use and may share information about you during the application process. We are required under data protection legislation to provide you with this information. Please ensure you read this notice (also referred to as a ‘privacy notice’) and any similar notice we may give you from time to time when we collect or handle personal data about you. Who collects the data [ Insert name of...

STOP PRESS: This document is currently being revised to take account of the implementation of the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 (DUAA 2025), which updates the UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018. For additional guidance on the compliance implications of DUAA 2025, please see Practice Note: Data (Use and Access) Act 2025—compliance implications. [ Name of individual making request ] [ Address of individual making request ] [ Date of this response ] Dear [ insert name of individual making request ] I write in reply to your request dated [ insert date of request ]...

In any specific context, a controller handling personal data or information must assess if the processing activity complies with what is now the applicable Assimilated Regulation (EU) 2016/679, the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR), and the Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA 2018)...

The Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FIA 2000) and the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA 1998) are distinct regimes, save for the overlap raised here. They otherwise operate separately from one another as a rule. FIA 2000 contains various exemptions. Those exemptions mean the kind, character or even the presence of the information need not be revealed under FIA 2000. For this scenario, the pertinent carve-out is in FIA 2000, s 40, in particular FIA 2000, ss 40(1) and 40(5)(a). Where the material amounts to personal data and the data subject seeks disclosure via FIA 2000, the exemption applies in absolute terms...

We have concentrated specifically on sections 108–110 of the Digital Economy Act 2017 (DEA 2017) and sections 132–133 of the draft Data Protection Bill 2017 (DPB 2017) for the purposes of this Q&A. Part III of the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA 1998) obliges data controllers who handle personal data to notify the Information Commissioner of their processing for inclusion in the register maintained by the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). Controllers seeking to register must pay an applicable fee. For further details, consult the Data Protection (Notification and Notification Fees) Regulations 2000, SI 2000/188, and official guidance from the Information Commissioner...