Powered by Lexis+®

Related Glossary Terms

CASE STUDY

“I'm able to do more in the day, which means I'm providing more value to my clients - and it's helped my margins in terms of how much I can bill. LexisNexis is helping me make money.”

ParrisWhittaker

Access all documents on Ejusdem generis

Ejusdem generis meaning

What does Ejusdem generis mean?
Ejusdem generis describes the approach that when a list of specific items is followed by broader, catch‑all words, those general words are read as confined to things of the same kind as the specifics. For example, “cars, vans and other vehicles” would not usually extend to aircraft or ships. The rule is a common‑law principle developed in case law (not defined by statute) and is applied across England and Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland to statutory interpretation and to the construction of contracts, wills and other instruments. Key features: - Preconditions: two or more specific items; a recognisable class; general words that follow; and no contrary intention. If no clear genus can be identified, the rule does not operate. - It yields to context: words such as “of any description whatsoever”, “without limitation” or a clear legislative purpose can displace it. - Akin to, but distinct from, noscitur a sociis and expressio unius. Practical use: aids courts and advisers in limiting overly broad readings of general words; informs drafting (for example, choosing whether to use inclusive wording to avoid the restriction); and supports advocacy on the scope of catch‑all phrases (e.g., “other”, “any others”). Usage is broadly consistent across the UK and Ireland.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Practice Notes about Ejusdem generis

PRACTICE NOTES
Contract construction: key canons and authorities (Rainy Sky, Arnold, Wood)—commercial sense, whole-document reading, inconsistencies, mistakes, rights limitations, contra proferentem, ejusdem generis, NOM clauses, redactions and surplusage

rules on interpreting contracts (agreements) This Practice Note outlines the rules for construing contracts and their terms, reviewing leading cases—Rainy Sky v Kookmin, Arnold v Britton, and Wood v Capita—together with the principal canons of construction. It should be read alongside the Practice Notes: Contract interpretation—the guiding principles; and How to approach a contractual interpretation dispute—a practical guide. Lord Hoffmann’s five principles in ICS v West Bromwich Building Society (see Practice Note: Contract interpretation—the guiding principles) provide the central approach to interpretation, which is then supported by general rules or guidelines (often called canons of construction) used to help determine the meaning of a written agreement. This Practice Note examines the most significant of these, namely: the whole document is relevant commercial sense (business common sense) and avoiding an unreasonable outcome cutting down rights and remedies saving the document consistency of terms mistakes in the contract the contra proferentem principle the ejusdem generis principle adjectives and determinators...

Read More Right Arrow