Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“The forms and precedents section is essential so that I can quickly and easily look up provisions to include in templates or bespoke project contracts.”

RWE

Access all documents on Enablement

Enablement meaning

Published by a LexisNexis IP expert
What does Enablement mean?
In patent practice, enablement describes whether the patent specification discloses the invention clearly and completely enough for the person skilled in the art, using common general knowledge, to make or perform the claimed invention across its full scope without undue burden or inventive effort. In the UK, this is the statutory sufficiency of disclosure requirement under the Patents Act 1977 and Article 83 EPC; “enablement” is a descriptive label used in UK and European case law. The assessment is made at the filing or priority date. A lack of enablement (insufficiency) can lead to refusal during examination or revocation of granted claims, and may require limiting amendment. Key features include: the disclosure must enable substantially all embodiments within the claim; any predictive teaching must be plausible; and routine verification is permitted, but prolonged research or trial-and-error is not. The concept is distinct from claim clarity. The approach is consistent across England & Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland under the 1977 Act, and broadly mirrors Irish law under the Patents Acts and the EPC. Enablement is central to patent drafting, prosecution, opposition and litigation strategy, and a frequent ground of invalidity.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about Enablement

NEWS
England planning law update: pre-commencement conditions decision, LURA 2023 commencements, NSIP reforms, Yorkshire GREEN DCO, and London Plan intervention—21 March 2024

In this issue: Obtaining, amending and implementing planning permission Levelling-up and Regeneration Act 2023 Nationally significant infrastructure projects Planning policy Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Latest Q&A Related Documents Obtaining, amending and implementing planning permission Court considers the question of discharge of pre-commencement conditions (Lisle-Mainwaring v RBKC) In Lisle-Mainwaring v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea [2024] EWHC 440 (Admin), the court dismissed the contention that a local planning authority (LPA) may decline to determine an application to discharge a condition if the decision is taken after the relevant planning permission has expired. It held that the broader rule—that an LPA’s ongoing duty to determine applications for planning permission and for reserved matters—equally applies to approvals required by planning conditions. This remains the position where an application is submitted before the implementation deadline runs out but is determined later. As this analysis had not been put to the LPA, the court...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Enablement

PRACTICE NOTES
Patent insufficiency under UK and European law: classical, Biogen and uncertainty, plausibility and undue burden, enablement across whole claim scope, and squeeze arguments—key principles and cases

Grounds of patent revocation Patents can be revoked (ie taken off the patents register) where they are found invalid in some respect. A revoked patent is treated as though it never existed. The statutory bases for revocation are contained in section 72 of the Patents Act 1977 (PA 1977). These include that the invention is not patentable (eg it lacks novelty, inventiveness or industrial applicability) and that the specification fails to disclose the invention with sufficient clarity and completeness for a person skilled in the art to put it into effect. This deficiency is called ‘insufficiency’. This Practice Note focuses on patent invalidity arising from insufficiency. For details on other invalidity grounds, see the following Practice Notes: Patent invalidity—grounds of revocation Patent invalidity—obviousness Patent invalidity—lack of novelty Claim construction/scope To assess validity and/or infringement, the court must interpret the patent claims—ie ascertain their meaning and extent. For further guidance on claim construction, see Practice Note: Patent infringement—Claim construction/scope...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Personalised and repurposed medicines: patentability, enforcement, SPCs, diagnostics, and regulatory exclusivities in the UK and EU

What is meant by ‘personalised medicines’? The expression ‘personalised medicine’, sometimes called ‘targeted medicine’, commonly refers to therapies aimed at rare conditions. As outlined in this Practice Note, these medicines often involve small‑molecule products repositioned for fresh indications or for subsets of existing patient cohorts that share a predictive biomarker of disease. They can also be biological medicines characterised by functional attributes. Such products present distinct challenges for securing patents and for patent enforcement, some of which are yet to be determined by the English courts. This Practice Note also sets out the limits of patent protection and supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) for these approaches, and signposts other rights relevant to research in this field, including the protection afforded by data and market exclusivity. What are rare diseases? Rare diseases are conditions that affect a small minority of the population. In the US, a rare disease is defined by the Orphan Drug Act as a disease or condition affecting fewer than 200,000 people in the US. In...

Read More Right Arrow