Powered by Lexis+®

Related Glossary Terms

CASE STUDY

“Because of the pure breadth and depth of black letter law research and practical guidance that LexisNexis provides, we don't have to rely on counsel as much as perhaps firms that don't use LexisNexis.”

KaurMaxwell

Access all documents on Encouraging or assisting crime

Encouraging or assisting crime meaning

What does Encouraging or assisting crime mean?
Encouraging or assisting crime describes conduct that urges, helps or enables another person to commit an offence. In England and Wales, and in Northern Ireland, it is a statutory inchoate liability under the Serious Crime Act 2007, Part 2 (ss 44–46), which abolished the common law offence of incitement. The offences are: intentionally encouraging or assisting an offence; encouraging or assisting, believing the offence will be committed; and encouraging or assisting, believing that one or more offences will be committed. An act merely capable of encouraging or assisting is sufficient; the principal offence need not be committed. Liability turns on intent or belief, and statutory defences include acting reasonably in the circumstances. These offences are distinct from secondary liability (aiding and abetting) and from conspiracy or attempt, though they frequently arise alongside them in charging decisions. In Scotland, the term is descriptive: there is no Part 2 SCA equivalent. Common law incitement remains, and participation is addressed under art-and-part liability. In Ireland, the term is also descriptive. Incitement remains at common law; assistance is typically prosecuted as aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring (Criminal law Act 1997, s 7), conspiracy (1976) or attempt.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Checklists about Encouraging or assisting crime

CHECKLISTS
Offences for which organisations may enter into DPAs under Crime and Courts Act 2013 Schedule 17 (including ancillary offences)—practitioners’ checklist

A deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) A DPA is a negotiated agreement between an organisation and a designated prosecutor, allowing the latter to defer a prosecution by staying an indictment on set conditions. Whilst the DPA remains in force, no proceedings relating to the covered matters may be brought against the organisation. Consequently, a company can continue operating without a protracted criminal investigation or an expensive prosecution hanging over it. For detailed information on DPAs, see the Practice Notes below: Deferred prosecution agreements DPA process Terms and content of a DPA DPAs in practice DPAs are only available to organisations for the offences specified in the Crime and Courts Act 2013, Schedule 17 (CCA 2013). The checklist below lists the offences for which a DPA may be entered into, covering both common law and statutory offences. In addition, any offence that is ancillary to those offences is eligible for disposal by a DPA. Ancillary offences include aiding and abetting, or...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Encouraging or assisting crime

PRACTICE NOTES
Assisting or Encouraging Suicide under the Suicide Act 1961, section 2: Elements, DPP Policy, Case Law and Sentencing (England and Wales)

Assisting or encouraging suicide since 1st February 2010 Section 1 of the Suicide Act 1961 (SA 1961) repealed the crime of suicide. Nonetheless, inciting or aiding another person’s suicide remains an offence under the law. Amendments to SA 1961, introduced by section 59 and Schedule 2 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009, took effect on 1 February 2010 and apply solely to conduct occurring on or after that date. Although the wording of SA 1961, s 2 was substantially revised, the scope of the law is entirely unchanged and wholly intact...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Perjury in England and Wales: Elements, Corroboration and Proof, Sentencing, False Statements and Statutory Declarations, and the Relationship with Perverting the Course of Justice

in judicial proceedings Perjury is an indictable-only offence, attracting a maximum of seven years’ imprisonment and/or a fine. The constituent parts of this offence are set out as follows: being a witness or an interpreter who has been duly sworn in judicial proceedings wilfully making a material statement that is false, and knowing it is untrue or not believing it to be true Assisting, encouraging or procuring perjury contrary to section 1 of the Act 1911 (PeA 1911) is likewise an indictable offence and also carries the same ceiling penalty. Where the principal wrongdoing amounts to a lesser offence triable either way, the maximum sentence available on indictment is two years’ custody and/or a fine; if dealt with summarily, the court may impose an unlimited fine and/or a custodial term not exceeding the general limit in a magistrates’ court (or both). See Practice Note: Sentences imposed following conviction—General limits on magistrates’ courts powers to impose custodial sentences following...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Corporate manslaughter under the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007: offence elements, investigation, prosecution and sentencing (including remedial and publicity orders)

Section 1 of the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 (CMCHA 2007) introduces the distinct offence of corporate manslaughter. The CMCHA 2007 applies across the UK and, at the same time, brings in the offence of corporate homicide for Scotland. This Practice Note addresses corporate manslaughter, not corporate homicide, because certain CMCHA 2007 provisions treat the two offences with slight differences. See Practice Note: Involuntary manslaughter. Corporate, not individual, liability The CMCHA 2007 targets organisational accountability and does not extend to directors or other individuals occupying senior positions within a company. It creates no personal liability under the CMCHA 2007. Further, CMCHA 2007, s 18 expressly provides that a person cannot be guilty of aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring the commission of corporate manslaughter, nor can a person be guilty of encouraging or assisting an offence of corporate manslaughter. Accordingly, responsibility under the Act rests with the organisation, not with any individual...

Read More Right Arrow