Powered by Lexis+®
CASE STUDY

“I'm able to do more in the day, which means I'm providing more value to my clients - and it's helped my margins in terms of how much I can bill. LexisNexis is helping me make money.”

ParrisWhittaker

Access all documents on End-user component

End-user component meaning

What does End-user component mean?
In practice, an end-user component is the customer‑premises device or software that receives a protected digital service and relies on access control (conditional access) to operate. It is a descriptive term used in media, broadcasting and telecoms contracts, rather than a defined statutory term. Related legislation in the UK and Ireland regulates conditional access devices and anti‑circumvention (implementing Directive 98/84/EC), but does not generally define “end‑user component”. Typical examples include set‑top boxes for interactive digital television, smart TVs, conditional access modules and smart cards, satellite or cable receivers, streaming sticks, and software clients or apps using DRM on computers, tablets or mobile phones. Key legal features concern: licensing and intellectual property in embedded software; content protection and prohibition on illicit devices or tampering; security and update obligations; ownership, maintenance, and return of supplier‑provided equipment; interoperability and consumer equipment compliance; and any processing of viewing or usage data. Usage is broadly consistent across England and Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland. Closely related regulated expressions include user equipment and terminal equipment in telecoms regulation. Set‑top boxes for the receipt of digital interactive services via television sets remain a common example of an end‑user component.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about End-user component

NEWS
Property law update—England & Wales and Scotland: Etridge hybrid undue influence, LTA 1987 pre-emption, tenancy deposit compliance, insurance commissions, HMLR PG6, and Scottish servitude and tenancy changes

In this issue: Residential property Insurance Transferring property Property in Scotland LexTalk®Property: a Lexis®Nexis community Additional property updates this week Daily and weekly news alerts Trackers New Q&As Residential property Undue influence—test in ‘hybrid’ cases In One Savings Bank Plc v Waller-Edwards [2024] EWCA Civ 302, the Court of Appeal, Civil Division, rejected the defendant’s appeal to resist the bank’s possession claim. She maintained the lender should have been alerted to undue influence when she and her former partner obtained a loan partly for their mutual non-commercial aims and partly for the partner’s benefit alone. The defendant suggested the proper test was that a lender is put on inquiry unless the aspect conferring a sole benefit on one borrower is insignificant. The Court concluded that test was incorrect, and that Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge (Etridge) governs, to be applied to the facts as found by the trial judge. Etridge did not stipulate...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
CJEU AG Szpunar: visual variations can change overall impression in modular system designs; 'informed user' attentive but not expert under EU 'Lego exception' (C-211/24)

Advocate General Maciej Szpunar advised the Court of Justice that, although the look of such designs might appear a marginal consideration because functionality dominates, EU judges ought to assess the ‘degree of freedom’ open to a designer when deciding if modest visual distinctions between designs suffice to create a different overall impression for the informed user. The dispute arises from an infringement action brought in Hungary by Danish toy maker Lego A/S, which claims a local business attempted to import construction sets violating one of Lego’s registered designs. The design at issue concerns a toy-building ‘coupling component’ described in court papers as a cylinder with studs together with two axles of cross-section profile. The Budapest High Court rejected Lego’s request to seize the sets, concluding that the design’s ‘creative scope’ was extremely narrow because the shape was wholly determined by its technical function. In that view, appearance played a subordinate role to technical necessity within this context...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about End-user component

PRACTICE NOTES
UK Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: scope, sectors, emissions coverage, pricing methodology, importer liability, and interactions with the UK ETS and EU CBAM, commencing 1 January 2027

What is the UK CBAM? The UK CBAM is a forthcoming charge, scheduled by the UK government for implementation on 1 January 2027, applied to the carbon both released and embedded in imports into the UK of specified ‘products’ (set out by a list of commodity codes) whose production is highly carbon‑emission intensive. In this context, ‘products’ are goods, articles or substances manufactured or refined for sale. Products can be raw materials, energy (such as electricity or heat), component parts, or finished goods. Certain products brought into the UK from countries with a lower, or no, ‘carbon price’ will be required to pay the charge. The liability imposed by the UK CBAM will depend on the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity embodied in the imported products and the gap between the carbon price applied in the country of origin (if any) and the carbon price that would have been applied had the products been produced in the UK. Embodied emissions are the GHG emissions linked to the manufacture of...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
UK taxation of termination payments in employment settlement agreements: components, HMRC challenges and case law, PILON/PENP, restrictive covenants, legal fees, PAYE after P45, pension rights pitfalls, and tax indemnities

Where a employee may have prospective claims against the employer under the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996) or other employment legislation, or might otherwise pursue a breach of contract claim, the parties can conclude a settlement agreement to terminate the employment on the terms specified in that document (although, on a limited number of occasions under employment law, certain claims cannot be compromised by a settlement agreement). Senior managers/shareholders can likewise execute settlement agreements if they depart when the employing business is sold. For a model settlement agreement (with drafting notes), see Precedents: Settlement agreement (employment) or Settlement agreement (employment) (short form). By agreeing a settlement, the employer gains assurance that the employee will not bring a future claim against the employer. Among other matters, the settlement agreement will address all sums and benefits due, or agreed, to be paid to the employee, and will record the terms on which employment is brought to an end...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Semiconductor topography rights in the UK: subsistence, qualification (including WTO countries), ownership, duration, infringement and reverse engineering; exhaustion and parallel imports; and complementary copyright, patent and trade secret protection

Background to semiconductors A semiconductor is, at its core, a material with electrical conductivity that can permit or, alternatively, obstruct the passage of electric current. Chips based on semiconductors—seen in devices such as computers, mobile phones and microwave ovens—are typically produced from circular silicon wafers. Intellectual property rights operate to safeguard the semiconductor sector, encompassing electronic circuit boards and the component chips. Semiconductor topography rights The semiconductor topography right sits alongside unregistered design law and is aimed at protecting a particular industrial article, namely, as noted above, the electronic circuit board and the layout of semiconductors. This right entered UK law through the Design Right (Semiconductor Topographies) Regulations 1989, SI 1989/1100, which implemented European Directive 87/54/EC and now form assimilated law as EU‑derived domestic legislation. Assimilated law is the term applied to retained EU law (REUL) that continues in force after the end of 2023. The shift from REUL (and related expressions) to assimilated law denotes a change in its status and treatment within UK law, in...

Read More Right Arrow