Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“We rely on LexisNexis to give us a definitive answer, quickly and reliable every time so that we can be confident in the advice we use to help our clients.”

Shelter

Access all documents on Engie

Engie meaning

Published by a LexisNexis Energy expert
What does Engie mean?
In UK and Irish legal practice, Engie usually denotes Engie S.A., the French energy utility, or its group entities acting as counterparties in energy, infrastructure, procurement and finance documents. It is a descriptive corporate reference rather than a term defined by legislation or case law, and usage is consistent across England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland. Older contracts may refer to its former name, gdf Suez (renamed Engie in 2015). Engie previously held a 40% shareholding in NuGeneration Limited, the special purpose vehicle for the proposed moorside nuclear new build in Cumbria. Following Westinghouse’s chapter 11 filing in the US in 2017, Engie exercised a contractual put option requiring Toshiba to acquire Engie’s stake; completion occurred in July 2017, leaving Toshiba as sole owner. NuGeneration was subsequently wound up after sale efforts failed. This history is frequently cited in UK energy and project finance practice for issues such as counterparty risk, insolvency-triggered options, change-of-control protections, and exit mechanics in shareholders’ agreements and SPV structures. When drafting or diligencing, ensure correct identification of the relevant Engie group entity (name changes, registered numbers and guarantees) and alignment of option and insolvency provisions with governing law.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about Engie

NEWS
Energy regulation update for GB and EU: Ofgem, DESNZ grid connections, heat networks, smart metering, nuclear CfDs, EU 2040 target (12 March 2026)

In this issue: Key developments and materials Electricity and gas market regulation, licensing and taxation Networks and network connections Capacity Market, balancing services and energy system flexibility Nuclear energy Oil and gas International energy New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Energy resources on Lexis+® Daily and weekly news alerts Key developments and materials DESNZ announces 100 schools now have Great British Energy solar panels DESNZ confirmed that Great British Energy solar arrays are now fitted at 100 schools and colleges nationwide. By summer 2026, roughly 250 institutions will benefit through a focused deployment that gives precedence to deprived communities in the North East, West Midlands and North West, and guarantees a minimum of ten schools in each English region. Across their lifespan, these installations are expected to deliver around £220m in cumulative savings for the 250 schools and colleges, allowing funds to be redirected into teaching spaces. See:...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Brazil: São Paulo court annuls award over arbitrator’s duty of disclosure; prior counsel ties and public domain defence rejected (Orion v Engie)

Orion Geradora de Energia Joint Venture 2 Ltda v Engie Brasil Energia Comercializadora Ltda, Apelação Cível No 0024255-13.2023.8.26.0100, Court of Appeals of the State of São Paulo What are the practical implications of this case? The Brazilian Arbitration Act (Federal Law No 9,307/1996) treats arbitral independence and impartiality as a cornerstone of the process. Accordingly, prospective arbitrators are bound to disclose any circumstance that might give rise to 'justified doubts' regarding their impartiality and independence. Moreover, disputes about an arbitrator's neutrality and autonomy may justify annulment of arbitral awards. In recent years, Brazilian courts have adopted differing views on what constitutes 'justified doubts' as to an arbitrator's impartiality and independence. They have also diverged on salient aspects, including: (a) whether the pertinent details are in the public domain; (b) how far the parties must co-operate to secure comprehensive disclosure; (c) whether the parties are under a duty to carry out their own checks on prospective arbitrators; and (d) the extent to...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
UK commercial law weekly: Spring Statement 2025, consumer law reforms, advertising rulings and data use, CMA ticketing action, key agency and contract cases, modern slavery guidance

In this issue: Spring Statement 2025 Advertising, marketing and sponsorship Agency and distribution Consumer protection Contracts International Supplier management New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Latest Q&As Spring Statement 2025 Spring Statement 2025—key Commercial announcements On 26 March 2025, as part of the Spring Budget, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rt Hon Rachel Reeves MP, set out the government’s programme to restore stability, ramp up investment, and stimulate economic growth. The initiatives revealed are intended to move the government closer to meeting the principal milestones in the Plan for Change, released in December 2024. See: LNB News 26/03/2025 52. Advertising, marketing and sponsorship Meta settles UK lawsuit over use of personal data for advertising MLex: Meta Platforms has concluded a UK claim and agreed to stop using personal data belonging to Tanya O’Carroll, a campaigner who contended the firm’s targeted advertising practices were not compliant with...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Engie

PRACTICE NOTES
CJEU annuls Commission’s 2018 Engie/Luxembourg tax ruling State aid decision: no correspondence principle; anti-abuse non-application not selective; Member States’ fiscal autonomy reaffirmed

CASE HUB ARCHIVED This archived case hub sets out the position as at the judgment date of 5 December 2023; it is no longer being updated. See the timeline for more details. Case facts Outline Appeals contesting the General Court’s judgment in Case T-516/18, which rejected an action seeking to annul the Commission’s decision of 20 June 2018. That decision concluded Luxembourg had provided unlawful State aid to Engie (formerly GDF Suez) through improper tax advantages (SA.44888). Latest developments On 5 December 2023, the Court of Justice delivered its ruling, allowing the appeal and annulling the Commission’s decision of 20 June 2018...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
UK merchant energy-from-waste contracts: procurement routes, funding, EPC/O&M and standard forms, risk allocation and key clauses, funder requirements, and Engie Fabricom guidance

EU ambitions to cut landfill disposal, together with advances in technology, spurred the roll-out of new waste infrastructure across the UK. Broadly, two principal contracting routes exist for such schemes: Waste Private Finance Initiative (PFI) and Public-Private Partnership (PPP) infrastructure contracts, which, from February 2025, are generally subject to the Procurement Act 2023. Existing PFI and Private Finance 2 (PF2) arrangements entered into before November 2018 continue to run Merchant waste infrastructure contracts A merchant contract is a binding agreement between a business (the merchant) and, commonly, an acquiring bank. Merchant waste schemes are those where the sponsor (or ‘acquiring bank’) is a private entity, for example the Green Investment Group. They may cover projects reliant on private, specialist feedstocks such as refuse derived fuel, commercial and industrial waste, and waste wood. This Practice Note concentrates on merchant waste infrastructure contracts. For details on waste PFI/PPP schemes, see Practice Note: Waste projects—waste PFI/PPP infrastructure projects. For general background on waste projects, including...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
EU General Court upholds Commission’s Engie/Luxembourg State aid decision; tax rulings selective via abuse-of-law non-application; economic reality over form; €120m recovery.

CASE HUB NOTE-appeals lodged before the Court of Justice in Cases C- 451/21 C- 454/21 ARCHIVED This archived case hub captures the position as at the judgment of 12 May 2021 and is no longer being updated. See the timeline for further details. Case facts Outline Joined Cases T- 516/18 Luxembourg v Commission and T- 525/18 Engie Global LNG Holdings and Others-applications for annulment before the General Court of the European Commission’s decision of 20 June 2018, which concluded that Luxembourg had provided unlawful State aid to Engie (formerly GDF Suez) through undue tax advantages (SA.44888). Latest development On 12 May 2021, the General Court issued its ruling, dismissing the actions in their entirety. It determined that the Commission was entitled to: (i) prioritise the economic reality of the intra-group structure over a purely formal approach; and (ii) find that a selective advantage existed, giving rise to State aid, due to the non-application of national provisions on abuse of law. Parties Applicants: ...

Read More Right Arrow