Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“In some areas of research there were also significant time savings. You get to what you are looking for more quickly, which all goes to the value of the product.”

Harper Mcleod

Access all documents on Equal treatment for men and women

Equal treatment for men and women meaning

Published by a LexisNexis EU Law expert
What does Equal treatment for men and women mean?
In legal practice, equal treatment for men and women means that a person must not be treated less favourably, or put at a particular disadvantage, because of their sex, and must receive equal pay for equal work (including like work, work rated as equivalent, or work of equal value). It is a cross‑cutting equality law concept used in employment, vocational training, and access to goods and services, covering direct and indirect sex discrimination, harassment, victimisation and pregnancy/maternity discrimination. Across Great Britain (England & Wales and Scotland) it is given effect primarily by the Equality Act 2010, with tribunal claims commonly alleging sex discrimination or equal pay. In Northern Ireland, equivalent protections are found mainly in the Sex Discrimination (Northern Ireland) Order 1976 and the Equal Pay Act (Northern Ireland) 1970. In Ireland, the Employment Equality Acts 1998–2015 and the Equal Status Acts 2000–2018 (implementing EU directives and Article 157 TFEU) provide the core framework. Defences and exceptions include genuine occupational requirements and objective justification for indirect discrimination; comparators and the burden‑of‑proof rules are central. Remedies include compensation (including injury to feelings) and declarations. While rooted in EU equality law, its content now derives from domestic statute in the UK, with EU law...
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Practice Notes about Equal treatment for men and women

PRACTICE NOTES
Part-time workers and pension discrimination in Great Britain: Equality Act 2010, Part-time Workers Regulations 2000, access, treatment, time limits, remedies, and key EU and UK case law

This Practice Note cites decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union. For advice on the extent to which EU rulings bind the courts of the United Kingdom, consult Practice Note: Assimilated law — Assimilated case law. The legislative framework Two distinct legislative strands must be assessed when considering part-time workers and discrimination. The first concerns equal treatment as between men and women. Because, historically, women have been more likely than men to work part-time, employment conditions, including pension scheme terms, that treat part-time staff less favourably may amount to discrimination against women. The second concerns measures directed specifically at safeguarding part-time workers. Equal treatment legislation Provisions intended to guarantee equality for men and women in relation to pension schemes have a long history. The current domestic position is contained in section 67 of the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010), which stipulates that any pension scheme lacking a sex equality rule is to be regarded as if such a rule were included. This ensures...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Indirect Effect of EU Law: From Von Colson to Marleasing, Scope and Limits, and Application by National Courts

What is indirect effect of EU law? The doctrine of indirect effect, also called consistent interpretation, imposes on national courts, as organs of the Member State charged with fulfilling EU commitments, a responsibility to construe domestic legislation in the light of EU law, in particular Directives. Through careful judicial reading of applicable national rules it indirectly secures the outcome that direct effect of Directives would deliver where that route is unavailable. The Court of Justice articulated the principle in Von Colson and enlarged its reach in Marleasing. It likewise functions to help to offset, at least to a degree, the adverse legal consequences of the refusal to acknowledge horizontal direct effect of Directives. For further background, consult Practice Note: Direct effect of EU law. Von Colson concerned a request for a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of Directive 76/207/EEC on giving practical effect to the principle of equal treatment for men and women regarding access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions. The underlying national dispute involved...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Equal pay: what counts as 'pay' under the Equality Act 2010 and Article 157 TFEU, including termination payments, pensions, maternity pay, and the contractual/non-contractual divide

This Practice Note explores the equal pay for equal work principle under the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) and, notably, what counts as ‘pay’. It addresses whether pay has to arise from contract and clarifies the concept of ‘pay’ in Article 157 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) (formerly Article 141 of the Treaty of Rome). It also reviews how termination payments, pensions and maternity pay are treated. The principle of equal pay for equal work Article 157 TFEU sets out the rule that workers are entitled to the same pay for the same work. Under European law, a distinction is drawn between equal pay (under Directive 75/117/EEC, the Equal Pay Directive) and equal treatment of men and women (under Directive 76/207/EEC, the Equal Treatment Directive and later measures). The Equal Treatment Directive, Directive 76/207/EEC, does not extend to ‘pay’. The equal pay for equal work principle has been described as fundamental to the European Union’s foundations. Article 157 TFEU has direct effect,...

Read More Right Arrow