“Although cost was an important factor, our relationship with LexisNexis, their responsiveness, flexibility, and the integration available with other products were key factors.”
Irwin MitchellAccess all documents on ERL
ARCHIVED - this archived case hub reflects the position at the date of the judgment of 15 July 2022; it is no longer maintained. See further, timeline. Case facts Outline of the CAT’s judgment concerning a standalone damages claim alleging abuse of a dominant position in the UK market for the sale and hire of academic dress for graduation ceremonies, said to result from exclusivity agreements. Latest development On 15 July 2022, the CAT handed down its judgment. The two applications before the CAT related to follow-on damages claims concerning the infringement identified in the Commission’s 2016 decision. The application brought by the claimants was filed on 26 June 2020. Parties Claimants Churchill Gowns Limited Student Gowns Limited (together, Churchill) Defendants Ede Ravenscroft Limited (ERL) Radcliffe & Taylor Limited (R&T) WM. Northam & Company Limited (Northam) Irish Legal and Academic Limited (ILA) (together, the E&R) Background...