Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“I'm able to do more in the day, which means I'm providing more value to my clients - and it's helped my margins in terms of how much I can bill. LexisNexis is helping me make money.”

ParrisWhittaker

Access all documents on Estimated outcome statement

Estimated outcome statement meaning

What does Estimated outcome statement mean?
An estimated outcome statement is a financial analysis prepared by an insolvency practitioner that sets out the expected asset realisations, costs and resulting distributions (dividends) to each class of creditor under a proposed insolvency or restructuring. It is a descriptive practice term rather than a defined statutory concept, though similar analyses are expected in various contexts (for example, administrators’ proposals and SIP 16 disclosures, and CVA or plan comparators). Key features include: - Estimated realisations, office-holder fees and expenses, and timing. - Waterfall of recoveries for secured creditors (fixed and floating charge), expenses, preferential creditors (including HMRC in GB and NI), any prescribed part (GB and NI), unsecured creditors and, if relevant, shareholders. - Assumptions, sensitivities and comparisons with alternative procedures (administration, liquidation, CVA, scheme of arrangement, restructuring plan). It is used to inform creditors’ decisions, court and regulatory disclosures, and, pre-appointment, to indicate an appointing lender’s potential shortfall and provisioning. Usage is broadly consistent across England & Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland (with similar priority rules and a prescribed part). In Ireland, comparable return analyses are produced within statutory reports for examinership and other processes, but there is no prescribed part; priority and terminology follow the Companies Act 2014 and related...
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Practice Notes about Estimated outcome statement

PRACTICE NOTES
Comprehensive glossary of UK restructuring and insolvency terms, covering Companies Act schemes, Part 26A plans, IA 1986 processes, and cross‑border concepts including COMI, UNCITRAL and assimilated EU rules.

This glossary sets out numerous expressions regularly encountered in the restructuring & insolvency sphere. Words shown in bold within definitions are themselves explained in other entries in this glossary as well. A Article X The MLIJ contains a single provision named Article X, aimed at jurisdictions that have already implemented the MLCBI, like England, or are weighing its adoption. Article X states: ‘Not withstanding any prior interpretation to the contrary, the relief available under [insert a cross-reference to the legislation of this State enacting Article 21 of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency] includes recognition and enforcement of a judgment’ (see Practice Note: UNCITRAL model law on recognition and enforcement of insolvency-related judgments (MLIJ): Article X). Asset-backed security (ABS) A form of security anchored by asset pools, for example loans, leases, and credit card receivables. Assimilated law From 1 January 2024, ‘retained law’ has been retitled ‘assimilated law’. The body of domestic law originally arising from EU obligations, created by the European...

Read More Right Arrow