EU Settlement Scheme meaning

In this issue: Electricity and gas market regulation and licensing Renewable energy Conventional power, waste to energy, biomass, and CHP projects Hydrogen, CCUS and emerging technologies Energy disputes Air emissions, efficiency, and climate change International energy LexTalk®Energy: a Lexis®Nexis community New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Energy resources on Lexis+® Daily and weekly news alerts Electricity and gas market regulation and licensing DESNZ confirms enduring governance for Smart Secure Electricity Systems DESNZ has issued its response to the 2025 consultation on enduring governance for the Smart Secure Electricity Systems (SSES) Programme, confirming that Elexon, through the Balancing and Settlement Code (BSC), will establish new Technical and Security Governance Groups to guide the technical and security frameworks that enable consumer-led flexibility. Using powers in section 245 of the Energy Act 2023, the government will amend the BSC so Elexon can run these groups as BSC Panel sub-committees and...

Fertré v Vale of White Horse District Council (The3million Ltd Secretary of State for Housing Communities and Local Government; Independent Monitoring Authority for the Citizens’ Rights Agreements; Shelter, the National Campaign for Homeless People Ltd and The Aire Centre, intervening) [2025] EWCA Civ 1057 What are the practical implications of this case? The Court of Appeal reiterated the divide between domestic residence rules and those under EU law, finding that Pre-Settled Status is a matter of UK law. Pre-Settled Status goes further than the EU residence rights framework. The pool of EU citizens eligible for Pre-Settled Status includes those who have EU residence rights by complying with the Citizens’ Rights Directive 2004/38/EC, but also those who do not meet the Directive and therefore lack such EU rights. In this case, the appellant held only Pre-Settled Status and had no enforceable EU right of residence beyond the first three months, so was not entitled to local authority housing. However, some with Pre-Settled Status also possess enforceable EU residence rights...

In this issue: UK, EU and international regulators and bodies Authorisation, approval and supervision Operational resilience Financial crime and sanctions Consumer protection Complaints, compensation and claims management Investigations, enforcement and discipline Regulation of capital markets Packaged Retail and Insurance-based Investment Products (PRIIPs) Dispute resolution for financial services lawyers Regulation of derivatives Sustainable finance and ESG Investment funds and asset management UK MiFID II EU MiFID II Payment services and systems Fintech and cryptoassets Regulation of AI in FS LexTalk®Financial Services: a Lexis®Nexis community Financial Services Enforcement Database Daily and weekly news alerts Intraday news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Latest Q&As No Weekly Highlights on 24 April 2025 UK, EU and international regulators and bodies FCA announces first international presence in US and Asia-Pacific regions The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has unveiled its...

ARCHIVED This Practice Note is no longer being updated, as it relates to the operation of EU free movement rules in the UK before IP completion day, when the domestic measures giving effect to EU free movement were revoked, subject to specified savings and adjustments. For more information, including the applicable savings and the status of CJEU jurisprudence, see Practice Note: Brexit and the end of EU free movement law in the UK. The Note remains available in archived form for historical reference, since EU law as it previously applied in the UK continues to be of relevance in some limited contexts. For earlier iterations of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016, SI 2016/1052, including the version immediately before revocation, see Legislation.gov.uk. For continuing developments in EU free movement law within EU Member States, see: Immigration, employment & share incentives (EU Law)—overview. European Economic Area (EEA) nationals who are working as employees or carrying on self-employed activity, and in certain cases jobseekers, have a right of residence in...

Background and introduction to SEPA After the euro was introduced in 11 EU countries in 1999, it became evident that domestic and cross-border retail payment services did not deliver comparable service levels. In September 1999, the European Central Bank (ECB) issued a report on enhancing cross-border retail payment services (the ECB 1999 Report). The report recognised that cross-border credit transfers within the euro area lagged significantly behind domestic credit transfers, even though a single currency environment called for a Single European Payment Area (SEPA). To initiate the debate and send a clear signal to the banking and payment systems industry, the Eurosystem (consisting of the ECB and the national central banks of countries that had adopted the euro) set out seven objectives for the industry to meet: Improved systems/services to be in place by 1 January 2002 Place priority on cross-border credit transfers Substantially lower the price of cross-border credit transfers Ensure settlement times are comparable for domestic and cross-border payments As...

ARCHIVED : This Practice Note is no longer maintained as it addressed the implementation of EU free movement law in the UK before IP completion day. On that day, the UK’s domestic legislation giving effect to EU free movement was revoked, subject to defined savings and modifications. For more detail, including those savings and the treatment of CJEU case law, see Practice Note: Brexit and the end of EU free movement law in the UK. The Practice Note is kept in archived form for historical reference, as EU law previously applied in the UK can still be relevant in certain limited circumstances. For historic versions of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016, SI 2016/1052, including the iteration immediately before revocation, see Legislation.gov.uk. For continuing developments in EU free movement law within EU Member States, see: Immigration, employment & share incentives (EU Law)—overview. IMPORTANT NOTE: The accession period for Bulgaria and Romania ended on 31 December 2013...

For the purposes of this Q&A, we have not taken into account the EU–UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA), as it is not directly enforceable; it is for the UK to give effect to its terms (insofar as not already addressed by the European Union (Future Relationship) Act 2020). For further detail, see News Analysis: Implementing the TCA—business immigration implications. As the EU citizen employees fall outside the EU Settlement Scheme and are not eligible for a frontier worker permit, the main immigration options to review are: Intra-Company Skilled Worker Visitor T5 International Agreement Worker Each category is discussed in more detail below. Intra-Company routes The Intra-Company routes allow organisations with connected overseas entities to transfer certain staff to their UK offices. From 1 January 2021, these routes cover EEA and Swiss citizens as well as non-EEA citizens. Both routes require a minimum period of prior employment with the overseas linked entity. As the EEA citizens are engaged...