European companies meaning

Competition authorities with jurisdiction in Ireland Competition authorities operating in Ireland, chiefly the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (CCPC) and, where applicable, the European Commission, possess broad powers to carry out surprise inspections, commonly called ‘dawn raids’. Such raids are a central investigative device for enforcing Irish and EU competition law, particularly in matters involving serious and grave breaches of competition rules like alleged cartel conduct, abuse of dominance, and wage‑fixing arrangements. For companies trading in Ireland, the unannounced arrival of the regulator’s authorised officers at their premises without prior warning can be both highly disruptive and risky. Businesses must be dawn raid‑ready to mitigate disruption and to safeguard their legal entitlements while meeting statutory duties throughout an inspection. This Checklist outlines pragmatic pointers to consider before a dawn raid, including forming a dawn raid response team, alongside key priority steps to take during the on‑site raid, managing legally privileged material, and the follow‑up once the raid has ended. Equipping your organisation with dawn raid readiness know‑how and a...

NOTE: This archived timetable outlines the usual sequence for a merger under The Companies (Cross-Border Mergers) Regulations 2007, SI 2007/297, before those regulations were revoked at the end of the Brexit implementation period... Background The European framework governing combinations between companies in different EEA member states stems from Directive 2005/56/EC, the Directive on Cross-Border Mergers of Limited Liability Companies (Directive). The UK gave effect to the Directive through The Companies (Cross-Border Mergers) Regulations 2007, SI 2007/2974, as subsequently amended by SI 2008/583, SI 2011/1606 and SI 2015/180 (together, the Cross-Border Mergers Regulations). Beyond setting out a merger mechanism, the Cross-Border Merger Regulations also regulate employee participation arrangements (see Employee participation arrangements below). The City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (Code) applies in the usual manner and on the normal basis where at least one party to the merger falls within the Code’s scope. The Takeover Panel (Panel) has issued a practice statement offering practical guidance on how the Code operates in cross-border merger scenarios. For more detailed information,...

This checklist outlines the key requirements of Regulation (EU) 2023/2854, the EU Data Act It sets out what businesses must adhere to, including the following areas: data access and portability smart contracts prohibition on unfair contractual terms right to switch services (operability) open interoperability rules on international data transfers The EU Data Act is designed to foster business-to-business (B2B) and business-to-consumers (B2C) data sharing from Internet of Things (IoT) devices, promoting fair use of data and enabling the EU to realise the full potential of its data economy. It represents the second major legislative step under the European strategy for data, following Regulation (EU) 2022/868, the EU Data Governance Act. Where the EU Data Governance Act establishes the mechanisms and structures that allow companies, individuals and the public sector to share data, the EU Data Act determines who may generate value from data and under which conditions. The EU Data Act entered into force on...

In this issue: Pay Prohibited conduct (discrimination etc) Equality, diversity and inclusion Whistleblowing Coronavirus (COVID-19) Issues arising on termination Employment tribunals Corporate governance Immigration Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content IRLR Highlights—September 2024 Dates for your diary Trackers New Q&As Pay Think tank High Pay Centre released analysis of FTSE 100 executive pay for 2023. While CEO pay growth has eased after the post-pandemic surge, the median package hit a new record, up from £4.1m in 2022 to £4.19m in 2023. See: LNB News 12/08/2024 34. Prohibited conduct (discrimination etc) ET permitted to reject dismissal complaints despite the employer’s previous omission to make reasonable adjustments. In Parnell v Royal Mail Group [2024] EAT 130, the claimant brought about 31 employment tribunal claims, divided into two periods, each decided by a different tribunal...

MLex was informed by the Data Protection Commission that it has written to DeepSeek seeking details about how it processes data relating to individuals in Ireland. The watchdog declined to add anything more for now. Ordinarily, the DPC acts as the principal data regulator handling privacy issues involving major technology companies in the EU, since many base their European headquarters there. However, DeepSeek’s operators lack an EU establishment, so any member state authority is able to open a probe into issues impacting its own jurisdiction directly too...

In this issue: Equity capital markets Corporate governance Public company takeovers (Offers) Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers New Q&As Useful information Equity capital markets FCA publishes consultations and policy statement aimed at capital markets reform The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has unveiled a suite of measures intended to reinforce the UK’s capital markets. These include: a consultation on proposed rules to create the new Public Offers and Admissions to Trading Regime (POATRs), which will replace the current UK Prospectus Regulation; a consultation setting out proposals for a new activity of operating a public offer platform; and a consultation on derivatives trading obligations designed to improve secondary market regulation, cut systemic risk and minimise disruption for firms. The package also contains policy statement PS24/9, Payment Optionality for Investment Research. See: LNB News 26/07/2024 25. FCA publishes updated checklists and forms following implementation of UK...

Premier Oil is among a number of oil and gas companies that have reassessed their funding options to cope with the effects of an extended period of low crude prices. Brexit impact From exit day (31 January 2020), the UK ceased to be an EU Member State. Nevertheless, under the Withdrawal Agreement, the UK entered an implementation period, during which EU law continued to apply. In many Brexit SIs, references to exit day should be construed as referring to IP completion day (the end of the implementation period, defined in clause 39 as 31 December 2020 at 11.00 pm), unless that wording is expressly disapplied by the relevant SI. For more detail, see News Analysis: Brexit—impact of the Withdrawal Agreement and European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 2020 for R&I lawyers, and Brexit Bulletin—key updates, research tips and resources. While schemes do not fall within the scope of the Recast Regulation on Insolvency, their later recognition frequently depends on Brussels I (recast) (see below and Practice Note: Brexit—impact on...

For many companies, intellectual property rights (IPRs) constitute an increasingly important and significant asset class. Although contemporary technology firms, pharmaceutical businesses and industrial players are most closely and very commonly linked with holding portfolios rich in IPRs, even the least likely organisations may own rights that are fundamental to them and, without which, they simply could not operate (or do so as effectively or profitably) or would suffer significant loss of value. As a broad category, IPRs are wide-ranging and inherently diverse indeed. According to context, there are, in particular, rights beyond the best known (patents, trade marks and copyright) that may—or may not—be generally regarded strictly as IPRs, such as database rights, websites with their associated domain names, goodwill and contractual rights allied to IPRs. For further detail on the principal types of intellectual property rights an insolvency practitioner as office holder may encounter, see Practice Note: IP right comparison table. Patents, design rights and trade marks depend for their existence and protection on registration (at the...

CASE HUB ARCHIVED – this archived case hub captures the position as at the judgment dated 12 December 2019; it is no longer maintained. See also the timeline, commentary, and related/relevant cases for further details. Case facts Outline Case C‑435/18 Otis Gesellshaft m.b.h. and Others v Land Oberösterreich and Others – a national judicial reference from Austria seeking clarification on whether various lift manufacturers should face damages claims by an Austrian local council on the basis that their cartel conduct increased the cost of its loans to construction companies. Latest developments On 12 December 2019, the Court of Justice handed down its judgment. The Court of Justice confirmed and clarified that, under Article 101 TFEU, persons who are neither suppliers nor customers on a market affected by a cartel may obtain compensation for loss caused by that cartel. Parties Otis Gesellshaft m.b.h. Land Oberösterreich Market The market for the supply of lifts and escalators in Austria’s territory....

Overview Joint ventures cover a wide spectrum of commercial arrangements, from merger-style integrations to co-operation confined to particular functions such as production, distribution, or research and development (R&D). This questionnaire seeks sufficient detail about the joint venture’s activities to enable an initial assessment of whether it is a full-function joint venture for the purposes of the EU Merger Regulation (Council Regulation No 139/2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings). If it is a full-function venture with an EU dimension (meaning the turnover thresholds are satisfied), the joint venture must be notified to the European Commission (the Commission) and cannot proceed until the Commission has found it compatible with the internal market. If the joint venture is not full-function and operates as a partnership that is, to a large extent, dependent on its parent companies, the establishment of the joint venture does not require notification; however, the Commission may exercise control after the fact, in light of Article 10(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union...