Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“In some areas of research there were also significant time savings. You get to what you are looking for more quickly, which all goes to the value of the product.”

Harper Mcleod

Access all documents on Excessive royalties

Excessive royalties meaning

Published by a LexisNexis IP expert
What does Excessive royalties mean?
In practice, excessive royalties describes royalty rates demanded by a dominant undertaking for licensing intellectual property or related rights that are unfair or disproportionate to the economic value of the licensed technology, work or service. It is not a term defined in statute, but a descriptive expression grounded in the case law on excessive pricing. The Court of Justice in United Brands v commission held that charging a price excessive because it bears no reasonable relation to the product’s economic value is an abuse; the same analysis can apply to royalties. Across England & Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, the Chapter II prohibition (Competition Act 1998) is applied, with EU excessive‑pricing jurisprudence influential. In Ireland, Article 102 TFEU and section 5 of the Competition Act 2002 (as amended) apply directly. Key features are: (1) dominance in the relevant licensing/technology market (including where a right is essential or standard‑essential), and (2) royalties that are unfair in themselves or when compared with benchmarks. Evidence may include price–cost margins, comparisons with other licences (including FRAND terms for SEPs), geographic or temporal comparators, and objective justifications (risk, investment, exclusivity). Typical contexts include patent and SEP licensing, collective rights management tariffs and patent pools. Potential outcomes include...
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Practice Notes about Excessive royalties

PRACTICE NOTES
EU competition law and intellectual property: Articles 101/102, technology transfer (TTBE), SEPs/FRAND, compulsory licensing, pay-for-delay, patent pools, litigation, settlements and copyright

STOP PRESS : On 30 April 2026, the European Commission approved an updated Technology Transfer Block Exemption Regulation (TTBER) together with accompanying Guidelines, supplanting the 2014 framework. The updated TTBER took effect on 1 May 2026. This Practice Note cites the TTBER and the Guidelines and is in the process of being refreshed to mirror these amendments. Finding equilibrium between intellectual property rights (IP/IPRs) and competition law is a longstanding issue. At a glance, the objectives of IPRs and competition law can seem at odds. In broad terms, IPR owners are entitled to govern access to, and seek payment for, exploitation of their exclusive rights. By contrast, competition law pursues open markets and restrains the misuse of market power. The Commission has acknowledged that the interplay of IPRs and competition law can raise concerns and create apparent friction. It has equally recognised that they are ultimately complementary, each guiding the other, meaning a careful balance is needed when assessing whether the exercise of IPRs aligns with competition law. Despite...

Read More Right Arrow