Excluded property meaning

FORTHCOMING CHANGE : The Renters’ Rights Act 2025 obtained Royal Assent on 27 October 2025. For guidance on the Act’s effect on residential tenancies in England, see Practice Note: Renters' Rights Act 2025—key provisions. This checklist sets out the principal issues to assess when handling a disposal of a property interest that is (or might be) subject to the tenants’ right of first refusal under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 (LTA 1987). For more detail and comprehensive guidance, see Practice Note: Tenants' right of first refusal—Landlord and Tenant Act 1987. Landlord Is the intended transferor ‘the landlord’? If yes, is the landlord ‘exempt’ or ‘resident’? In either situation, the right of first refusal does not arise. Disposal Is the landlord entering into an arrangement amounting to a ‘disposal’ (including a contract to create or dispose of an estate or interest in land, an assignment of rights under such a contract, or a contract to assign rights under...

Introduction This checklist sits alongside the more detailed Practice Note: Negotiation guide—services agreements. It serves as a quick-look aide and concentrates on the principal, generic points that commonly surface across most forms of services agreement. It leaves out certain specialist matters addressed in Practice Note: Negotiation guide—services agreements that tend to arise only in particular categories of services arrangements or those of greater complexity (eg acceptance testing, audit rights, TUPE, step-in rights, benchmarking and exit assistance). It sets out the customer’s and the supplier’s optimal stances for each topic, then offers a proposed middle-ground position (which is not intended to be comprehensive). For deeper analysis and explanation of each point, refer to Practice Note: Negotiation guide—services agreements. For balanced precedent contracts, which implement much of what is explored here and in the negotiation guide, see Precedents: Services agreement—one-off supply—balanced, Services agreement (ongoing supply)—balanced and Framework services agreement—single contract with call-off orders—balanced. This checklist is relevant only to business-to-business dealings in commercial practice...

Compulsory liquidation Provide a certified court interlocutor ordering winding up and naming the liquidator, plus certified proof of appointment: creditors’ resolution, contributories’ resolution with the liquidator’s certificate on the creditors’ meeting, or a court order. Creditors’ voluntary liquidation Include a certified general meeting winding‑up resolution and either the creditors’ resolution appointing the liquidator or a court order. If moving straight from administration, add a certified, administrator‑signed and Companies House‑stamped form 2.25B (Scotland). Members' voluntary liquidation Supply a liquidator/secretary certificate that a solvency declaration was filed, and a certified general meeting resolution appointing the liquidator. Checking the appointment Irregularities do not invalidate acts, but absence of appointment does—so verify appointment and any limits on Schedule 4 powers; in compulsory cases powers are court‑controlled and creditors or contributories may apply. Joint liquidators Confirm power to act severally; otherwise all must execute sale documents. ...

Flowchart This Flowchart aims to guide you through dealing with a superSAR submitted under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, as amended by the Criminal Finances Act 2017. See further Practice Note: Proceeds of Crime Act 2002—information sharing in the regulated sector—superSARs...

ARCHIVED: This flowchart has been archived and is not maintained. These flowcharts were produced to help identify whether an asset counts as excluded property for UK inheritance tax (IHT) on or after 6 April 2017. From 6 April 2025, a new framework came into force, replacing domicile as the primary test for an individual’s IHT exposure with the concept of long‑term residence. The reforms also adjusted the criteria for when trust property falls within the scope of excluded property... From 6 April 2025, assets held in trust qualify as excluded property only where: they are non‑UK situs assets, and the settlor is not a long‑term resident of the UK at the point a potential IHT charge arises For more information, see Practice Note: New IHT regime from 6 April 2025—FAQs. The flowcharts consider whether an asset is excluded property by reference to the location (situs) of the property and, where relevant, the domicile of the beneficial owner or settlor...

On 7 April 2026, Dyson secured an interim injunction against Chinese rival Dreame after the UPC tribunal held that the ‘Dazzle’ hair styler infringed Dyson’s patent, compelling a suspension of sales throughout all UPC Member States and Spain. The Hamburg Local Division explained that including Spain (despite it not being a UPC Member State) was warranted because Dreame’s EU-based importer was actively putting the goods on the Spanish market, thereby creating a sufficiently close jurisdictional connection to hear the claims together under EU jurisdictional rules. The panel, chaired by Sabine Klepsch, declined to stretch the order to the UK. Citing the UK–EU Windsor Framework, under which certain EU product safety requirements still apply in Northern Ireland and oblige non‑EU manufacturers to appoint an EU-based representative to place goods there, Dyson argued this regulatory nexus tied UK sales to the EU and could ground UPC jurisdiction. The judges disagreed, concluding those provisions are principally intended to smooth trade between Northern Ireland and the EU, not to create an adequate legal link...

AI regulatory ‘sandboxes’ On 21 October 2025, the technology ministry set out plans to establish AI regulatory ‘sandboxes’ aimed at spotting and removing regulatory obstacles across healthcare, professional services, transport, and robotics within advanced manufacturing. These sandboxes permit specific rules to be temporarily relaxed or adjusted for a set period inside secure, controlled trial environments designed for testing. Nonetheless, the announcement makes it clear that certain areas sit outside the sandbox, including: consumer protection and safety requirements fundamental rights protections for workers intellectual property rights...

In this issue Trusts Court of Protection Elderly and vulnerable clients UK taxes for Private Client HMRC Manuals updates Tax avoidance, evasion and non-compliance Budgets and Finance Bills Contentious trusts and estates Pensions, insurance and tax efficient investments International Question of the week Additional Private Client updates this week Daily and weekly news alerts LexTalk®Private Client: a Lexis+® community New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Latest Q&As Useful information Trusts Insufficient credible evidence led to rejection of trustee expense claims (Hubbard v Hubbard) An account in common form concerning a trust holding development land, with trustees reporting to beneficiaries. The court determined the trustees failed to properly substantiate numerous costs, leading to substantial disallowances. Core principles include: trustees bear the onus to prove expenditure charged to the trust; poor or absent records are no excuse; and the court may grant a...

For many years, virtually every disagreement about agricultural tenancies was sent to arbitration at the outset. The rationale was that questions concerning agricultural holdings often have a strong practical dimension, so arbitration was thought a more suitable forum than the courts. This reflected the earlier assumption that practical considerations predominated in such cases, making a court reference less apt back then. Over time, however, matters of considerable legal intricacy also came before arbitrators. With the enactment of the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act 2003 (AH(S)A 2003), policy shifted, and the main route for resolving disputes about agricultural tenant issues is now referral to the Scottish Land Court. At the same time, arbitration procedures were streamlined, and alternative processes, eg mediation, were enabled. Although the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act 1991 (AH(S)A 1991) still sets out distinct mechanisms for dispute resolution, AH(S)A 2003 has substantially reshaped them, so that the arrangements for resolving disputes under 1991 Act Tenancies are, in large part, aligned with those for 2003 Act Tenancies...

Prior to the coming into force of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987, Part II (LTA 1987), the court retained a wide-ranging jurisdiction to appoint a receiver to assume control of the management of any property (including a block of flats) whenever it was considered just and convenient to do so. Nonetheless, that power was seldom exercised in practice in relation to blocks of flats, likely owing to the expense and the frequent requirement, in most cases, and, where applicable, to evidence default by the landlord or managing agents regarding the performance of the landlord’s repairing, maintenance or insurance obligations under the lease. Part II of the LTA 1987 offers an alternative remedy by vesting power in (what are now) the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) in England and the leasehold valuation tribunal in Wales to appoint a manager to take over the management of premises comprising flats; yet that jurisdiction likewise arises only where there is some default by the landlord or the managing agents in performing the landlord’s repair,...

This Practice Note sets out the practical measures a tenant should take to renew its business tenancy under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (LTA 1954) where the landlord does not object. It outlines how to serve a section 26 request for a new lease or respond to a landlord’s section 25 notice, the time limit for starting proceedings, agreeing extensions to that statutory limit, the required form and content of the claim, the correct court for issue, how to answer the claim, and the subsequent stages of the lease renewal process. Check LTA 1954 applies Before acting, confirm that LTA 1954 applies per s 23, namely: there is a periodic or fixed-term tenancy; the LTA 1954 does not cover, for example, a licence or a tenancy at will the tenant occupies at least part of the premises that occupation is wholly or partly for business purposes and the letting is not within a class excluded from LTA 1954 protection ...

FORTHCOMING CHANGE: Potential changes to Wills Act 1837 The Law Commission’s review of wills culminated in a final report on 16 May 2025. Volume II contains a Draft Bill proposing replacement of the Wills Act 1837. For details of these proposals, including the published draft legislation, see Practice Note: Hot topic—modernising Wills and Modernising wills: Final Report Volume II: Draft Bill for a new Wills Act. STOP PRESS: Abolition of non-dom regime and introduction of residence-based IHT regime The Finance Act 2025 (FA 2025), which received Royal Assent on 20 March 2025, implements the abolition of the remittance basis and introduces a residence-based regime from 6 April 2025. FA 2025 makes residence, rather than domicile, the main determinant of liability to inheritance tax. changes to the rules defining excluded property status; removal of protected settlements status for offshore trusts; and modifications to overseas workday relief. For further information, see Practice Notes: The abolition of the remittance basis of taxation...

FORTHCOMING CHANGE: Potential changes to Wills Act 1837 On 16 May 2025, the Law Commission’s review of Wills published its final report, formally setting out its conclusions, with Volume II containing a draft Bill intended to supersede the Wills Act 1837. For details of these proposals, including the published draft legislation, consult Practice Note: Hot topic—modernising Wills and Modernising wills: Final Report Volume II: draft Bill for a new Wills Act. STOP PRESS: Ending the non-dom regime and moving to a residence-based IHT regime. The Finance Act 2025 (FA 2025), which obtained Royal Assent on 20 March 2025, enacts legislation for the removal of the remittance basis of taxation and substitutes a residence-based system commencing on 6 April 2025. It also displaces domicile as the principal determinant of inheritance tax (IHT) liability for individuals. Further measures cover revisions to the rules for excluded property status, the removal of protected settlements status for offshore trusts, and alterations to overseas workday relief as applicable. For more on these reforms, see...

Your Ref: Our Ref: Date: From: [ insert name of landlord’s solicitor ] at [ insert address ] To: [ insert name of tenant or tenant’s solicitor ] at [ insert address ] Dear [ insert organisation name ] [ insert particulars of the lease ] (the ‘Lease’) relating to [ insert name of property ] (the ‘Property’) We act on behalf of [ insert name of client ], being [ your landlord OR your client’s landlord ] under the Lease. Please note that [ your OR your client’s ] Lease of the Property is scheduled to end on [ insert date of determination of the contractual term of the lease ]. Kindly arrange for [ you OR your client ] to yield up possession of the Property upon the Lease’s expiry. For the return of the keys, [ Our client’s OR Our client’s agent’s ] contact particulars are [ insert landlord or agent’s contact details ]. If you...

Right to rent scheme The duties imposed by the right to rent scheme extend to all relevant lettings described in Practice Note: Residential tenancies—a tenant’s right to rent under the Immigration Act 2014, except where a letting is an excluded tenancy set out in Schedule 3 to the Immigration Act 2014 (IA 2014), also cited in that Practice Note. Be aware that social housing—as defined in IA 2014, Sch 3—is outside scope entirely...

Section 1(1)(a) of the Housing Act 1988 (HA 1988) Under this provision in the Act, only an individual can be the tenant of an assured tenancy. Consequently, a company letting cannot qualify as an assured shorthold tenancy (AST). The HA 1988 also specifies categories of tenancy that are excluded from being ASTs, including business tenancies under the Act. As a result, the arrangement will then fall either as a common law tenancy—outside the HA 1988 and subject to ordinary contractual principles—or, where the relevant requirements are satisfied, as a business tenancy...

Mary Ashley of 15 Old Square Higher SDLT rates apply where an individual buys a major interest in a single dwelling if conditions A–D are met at day‑end: A — consideration of £40,000 or more B — not subject to a lease with over 21 years unexpired C — purchaser owns another £40,000+ dwelling not so leased D — does not replace the only or main residence Dwelling includes a building or part used, suitable or being built/adapted as one dwelling, its gardens, grounds and benefiting land, and off‑plan contracts. Mixed‑use is excluded; no apportionment. As this freehold includes residential and non‑residential parts, it is mixed‑use, so the 3% surcharge should not arise. Sean Randall of Blick Rothenberg Limited The 3% applies to “higher rates transactions” in FA 2003, Sch 4ZA, paras 3–7, each requiring the main subject‑matter to consist of a major interest in at least one dwelling. The chargeable interest includes the first‑floor flat but does...