Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“LexisNexis is great as I can find the answers I am looking for really quickly. I believe that nothing should be more than 6 clicks away - and the products from LexisNexis deliver on this standard”

Avensure

Access all documents on Excluded subject matter

Excluded subject matter meaning

Published by a LexisNexis IP expert
What does Excluded subject matter mean?
Excluded subject matter describes categories that are not treated as patentable inventions because they lack the required technical character. In UK practice (Patents Act 1977, section 1(2), reflecting EPC Article 52(2)–(3)) and in Ireland (Patents Act 1992), this includes discoveries, scientific theories and mathematical methods; aesthetic creations; schemes, rules or methods for mental acts, games or doing business; computer programmes; and the presentation of information. These are excluded “as such”: a claim that makes a technical contribution beyond the excluded category may still be patentable. UK courts and the UKIPO apply the Aerotel/Macrossan four‑step approach, refined by cases such as Symbian and AT&T/HTC, to assess whether there is a technical effect. The EPO’s COMVIK approach is influential, and practice is broadly aligned across England & Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. Ireland applies the same EPC‑based exclusions and requires a technical effect. In practice, the term guides claim drafting, prosecution and patent litigation, particularly for software, business methods and information modelling, to avoid claiming only abstract ideas. It is distinct from other statutory exclusions (for example, methods of treatment or diagnosis practised on the human or animal body, and inventions contrary to public policy or morality).
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about Excluded subject matter

NEWS
India’s 2024 draft Arbitration Act amendments: critical analysis and recommendations on court jurisdiction, interim measures, emergency arbitration, appellate tribunals, set aside grounds, seat, consent awards, disclosure, council and timelines

Definition of ‘court’ The Draft Bill introduces a revised meaning of ‘court’, tied to the category of arbitration and the seat: For arbitrations other than international commercial arbitrations (‘ICA’): where the seat is determined, ‘court’ is the court with pecuniary and territorial jurisdiction over that seat. If the seat is not determined, it is the court with pecuniary and territorial competence to adjudicate the disputes that form the subject-matter of the arbitration. For ICAs: where the seat is determined, ‘court’ is the High Court with territorial jurisdiction over the seat. If the seat is not determined, it is the High Court with territorial jurisdiction to resolve the disputes that constitute the subject-matter of the arbitration. The proposed amendment should also clarify, within the definition, the proper court for applications linked to foreign-seated arbitrations. Where Part I of the Act has not been explicitly excluded, parties to foreign-seated arbitrations may seek the assistance of Indian courts for interim relief under Section 9 of...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Excluded subject matter

PRACTICE NOTES
Recognition and enforcement of judgments and judicial settlements under the 2005 Hague Choice of Court Convention: procedures, documents, refusal grounds, severability, non-monetary remedies, damages and preliminary questions

This Practice Note explores the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements and how it operates when enforcing a court judgment or a judicial settlement. It addresses what counts as a judgment and a judicial settlement, the criteria for recognition and enforcement of a court judgment, including severability, together with enforcement of non-monetary orders and judicial settlements. The Practice Note also outlines the steps for recognition and enforcement, the supporting documents needed, and points specific to England and Wales. Finally, it considers the bases for refusing recognition or enforcement under the convention. For practitioners using the Convention, an explanatory report by Trevor Hartley and Masato Dogauchi offers detailed commentary on each article. It further signposts severability within judgments and the treatment of non-monetary relief and settlements under the convention. Does the Convention apply?—transitional provisions Article 16 of the convention is central when deciding whether the convention governs a matter involving a newly acceding contracting state. For general guidance, see Practice Note: Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements—application...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
European patent applications at the EPO: EPC filing, patentability and formal requirements, prosecution to grant, validation, Unitary Patent/UPC, PCT routes, and post-grant opposition/limitation, fees

This Practice Note outlines the requirements and procedural steps for European patent applications at the European Patent Office (EPO), covering EPO post‑grant opposition and limitation procedures. It further explains that, once a European patent is granted, the proprietor may lodge a ‘request for unitary effect’ with the EPO to obtain a unitary patent. European patents There are two types of European patents: European bundle patents—often called ‘classic’ or ‘traditional’ European patents, or simply European patents or EPs for short, and European patents with unitary effect—commonly known as unitary patents European bundle patents The European Patent Convention (EPC) created a single route for securing patents in multiple countries from one patent application. The EPC is applied by the EPO, which serves as the executive arm of the European Patent Organisation, an international organisation with 39 member states, including all 27 EU Member States plus certain non‑EU members such as the UK, Norway, Switzerland and Turkey. European bundle patents can confer protection...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
UK corporation tax: definition and scope of derivative contracts (options, futures, CfDs), accounting tests, underlying subject matter, exclusions and embedded derivatives under CTA 2009 Part 7, and deeming rules

The derivative contracts rules The derivative contracts regime determines how a company’s profits and losses arising from its derivative arrangements are taxed. The core provisions are contained in Part 7 of the Corporation Tax Act 2009 (CTA 2009), which this Practice Note refers to simply as Part 7. Relevant secondary legislation also applies, in particular the regulations commonly called the ‘Disregard Regs’ (the Loan Relationships and Derivative Contracts (Disregard and Bringing into Account of Profits and Losses) Regulations 2004, SI 2004/3256). This Practice Note considers the entities involved, together with the categories of instruments and transactions that fall within the ambit of the derivative contracts regime. For rules on computation—covering how profits and losses on derivative contracts are calculated and brought into account for corporation tax—see Practice Note: Taxation of derivatives—the main rules...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Q&As about Excluded subject matter

Q&As
SDLT: Mixed‑use freehold (leased shop + flat) — 3% surcharge avoided?

Mary Ashley of 15 Old Square Higher SDLT rates apply where an individual buys a major interest in a single dwelling if conditions A–D are met at day‑end: A — consideration of £40,000 or more B — not subject to a lease with over 21 years unexpired C — purchaser owns another £40,000+ dwelling not so leased D — does not replace the only or main residence Dwelling includes a building or part used, suitable or being built/adapted as one dwelling, its gardens, grounds and benefiting land, and off‑plan contracts. Mixed‑use is excluded; no apportionment. As this freehold includes residential and non‑residential parts, it is mixed‑use, so the 3% surcharge should not arise. Sean Randall of Blick Rothenberg Limited The 3% applies to “higher rates transactions” in FA 2003, Sch 4ZA, paras 3–7, each requiring the main subject‑matter to consist of a major interest in at least one dwelling. The chargeable interest includes the first‑floor flat but does...

Read More Right Arrow