Extension of time meaning

This Checklist sets out the principal procedural steps and considerations for parties preparing or answering a request to extend time in judicial review claims before the Administrative Court. It should be read alongside Practice Note: Judicial review time limits—extensions and urgent cases. Time limits for bringing claims and the requirement to act 'promptly' Where proceedings are started in the High Court, the claim form must be lodged promptly and, in any case, no later than three months from the date the grounds first arose, subject to the shorter periods below: challenges to planning decisions must be issued within six weeks of the date the grounds to bring the claim first arose challenges to procurement decisions under the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 must be brought within 30 days of the date the grounds to bring the claim first arose...

The early conciliation (EC) requirement The early conciliation (EC) requirement—sometimes referred to as mandatory Acas early conciliation—obliges a would‑be claimant to give Acas specified details, including certain information, before issuing an employment tribunal claim, as provided by section 18A(1) of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996 (ETA 1996). For more detail, see Practice Note: The early conciliation requirement. This Checklist explains which claims constitute ‘relevant proceedings’, and identifies those that are caught by the early conciliation requirement either because of: ETA 1996, s 18(1A), or a specific provision in the applicable legislation For guidance on relevant proceedings, see Practice Note: The early conciliation requirement—Relevant proceedings. Where a prospective claimant satisfies the early conciliation requirement, there is, in almost all cases, a statutory extension to the usual deadline within which a claim must be presented to an employment tribunal. This Checklist also indicates where the operative extension provisions on time limits are located, and highlights categories of proceedings to which those extension provisions...

Caveat is entered Non-Contentious Probate Rules 1987 (NCPR 1987), SI 1987/2024 (as amended) Apply for a caveat online or via Form PA8A (see the forms tab within the Probate actions subtopic) — NCPR 1987, SI 1987/2024, r 44(2). The caveator lodges the caveat at the Principal Registry of the Family Division or at a district probate registry by post or electronically — NCPR 1987, SI 1987/2024, r 44. Fee: £3; if submitted electronically, payment must also be electronic — NCPR 1987, SI 1987/2024, r 44. The deceased’s name is recorded in the index of caveats — NCPR 1987, SI 1987/2024, r 44(4). Unless otherwise provided, the caveat endures for six months from the date of entry — NCPR 1987, SI 1987/2024, r 44(3)(a). The index of caveats is checked — NCPR 1987, SI 1987/2024, r 44(4). On receiving an application for a grant at the registry of filing or notice of an application made elsewhere, the district judge or registrar...

This flowchart supports a tenant’s bid to extend a lease under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 (LRHUDA 1993). It explains the procedure beginning with service of the tenant’s section 42 notice, then the landlord’s section 45 counter-notice, and the time limits for issuing applications to the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) (or, in Wales, the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal (LVT)), and/or to the County Court where required. Note 1 See Practice Note: Guide to lease extensions of flats under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993—Preparation for securing a lease extension...

This flowchart outlines the method for assessing whether or not a defendant possesses a criminal lifestyle, for the purposes of confiscation proceedings pursuant to the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002...

Clause 20.2 claims flowchart summary (FIDIC 2017) This flowchart describes the process for claims by the Contractor or Employer under clause 20.2 of the FIDIC Red and Yellow Books 2017, and applies to the following: Employer claims for the following: additional payment or a decrease in the Contract Price; and/or an extension of the Defects Notification Period Contractor claims for the following: additional payment; and/or an extension to the Time for Completion The party making a claim must also meet any specific requirements found in the clause setting out the relevant entitlement. For more information, see Practice Note: FIDIC contracts 2017—Contractor and Employer claims...

In this issue Working time and flexible working Pay Tax Prohibited conduct (discrimination etc) Employment tribunal equality claims Diversity and gender pay gap Industrial action Unfair dismissal Employment tribunals Immigration Northern Ireland ESG and sustainability: employment issues Daily and weekly news alerts Dates for your diary Trackers New Q&As Working time and flexible working Code of Practice (Requests for Flexible Working) Order 2024 (SI 2024/429): The Order designates 6 April 2024 as the date on which the updated Code of Practice on handling requests for flexible working, issued by the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (Acas) under section 199 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (TULR(C)A 1992), takes effect. It also clarifies that the revised Code does not cover applications for flexible working made under section 80F of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996) that are lodged on or before 5 April 2024;...

In this edition: Employment contract Pay Protected characteristics Prohibited conduct (discrimination etc) Prohibited conduct protection at work Equality of terms (equal pay) Employment Appeal Tribunal Governance and regulatory Immigration Dates for your diary Trackers New Q&As Employment resources on Lexis+® Daily and weekly news alerts Employment contract UKSC upholds claimants’ appeal and restores injunction in Tesco ‘fire and rehire’ case In Tesco Stores Ltd v Union of Shop, Distributive and Allied Workers (USDAW) [2024] UKSC 28, Tesco moved to end employees’ contracts to remove their ‘retained pay’—a contractual financial entitlement accepted as permanent—and to offer re-engagement on new terms excluding that pay. Working with the union, USDAW, several employees obtained a High Court injunction restraining Tesco from dismissing them in order to take away the retained pay entitlement. The Court of Appeal, however, allowed Tesco’s appeal against that order. The Supreme Court has since backed the claimants’ appeal and...

In this issue: Enforcing security and property insolvency Service charges Disputes and remedies Repairing obligations and dilapidations Residential tenancies Rent and rates Contractual issues Additional Property Disputes updates LexTalk®Property Disputes: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Latest Q&As Enforcing security and property insolvency Applications for possession and sale of the family home in bankruptcy (Armstrong v Temblett) The matter involved an application by Mr Armstrong, acting as trustee in bankruptcy (the trustee), seeking an order for possession and sale of Mrs Vanessa Temblett’s London property, jointly owned with her husband (the London property). The court determined that, under section 335A of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986), the trustee was entitled to possession and sale, as no exceptional circumstances were identified to rebut the statutory presumption that creditors’ interests prevail over other factors. The judgment highlights the need for practitioners...

What is land remediation relief? (LRR) LRR provides corporation tax relief on expenditure incurred in remediating contaminated land or in bringing derelict sites back into use. In 2009, the regime was broadened to address market failure by returning long-term derelict land to use, bringing such sites back into use. An incentive applies where land, whose development has been affected by various kinds of continuing dereliction, is brought back into productive use. The extension was intended to correct market failure by encouraging activity on sites blighted by ongoing dereliction. The relief was at risk of being discontinued after 2012; however, the 2012 Budget confirmed it would continue. The October 2024 HM Treasury Corporate Tax Roadmap, published alongside Autumn Budget 2024, notes the new Labour government’s commitment to a brownfield-first approach, prioritising the development of previously used land wherever possible. Given the time since the last review of LRR, and the potential for it to help progress the government’s objectives, the Roadmap announced that a consultation would be launched to...

Practice Note This Practice Note consolidates our content on the amendments as introduced in the 2024 editions of the Joint Contracts Tribunal (JCT) standard form construction contracts...

Certain specified employees have the statutory right to make a request to undertake study or training This entitlement applies to employees working for organisations with 250 or more staff who meet the qualifying service requirement (see: Eligibility and qualifying period, below). Although the scheme was originally intended to be broadened to include smaller employers, the government deferred that step to allow further evaluation of the likely impact on small businesses, and there are currently no plans to proceed with any extension. The approach to counting the number of employees for these purposes is prescribed by the Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Act 2009 (Commencement No 2 and Transitional and Saving Provisions) Order 2010 (Commencement No 2 Order 2010), SI 2010/303. For a pro-forma policy aligned with the statutory arrangements, see Precedent: Policy—time off work for study and training. Official guidance on this right can be found on the GOV.UK website. The legal position on study or training rights and obligations for young employees is distinct from that applicable...

Variations can also push back the completion date, and may give the Claimant a right to extra time and to prolongation costs. These elements of a variation claim are commonly pursued separately, as an extension of time claim and a prolongation costs claim. By way of illustration, the principal JCT forms provide distinct procedures: one for pricing the changed work, and another for evaluating loss and expense arising from the variation’s effect on the progress of the works (see Practice Note: JCT contracts—variations — Valuing variations under JCT contracts). Accordingly, Claimants should take care not to ‘double dip’ across the separate elements of the claims. No. Description of Variation Claimant’s case Defendant’s response Judge/Tribunal comments The Claimant intended to adopt slab foundations for block A, as depicted on the Claimant’s drawing reference XX dated XX. By email dated XX, the Defendant directed the use of piled foundations for block A...

[ insert name and address of the claimant or the claimant’s legal representative ] [ insert date ] [ Claimant v Defendant—Case number ] Dear [ insert organisation name ] Thank you for your letter dated [ insert date ] seeking extra time for [ describe the length of the extension requested and the step to be taken ]. [ Either: We have reviewed your request and are unable to agree. [ Provide reasons for refusal ] OR explain why the period requested is too long and put forward a shorter timetable ] OR We have considered the request and will agree subject to these conditions: Your client shall pay our client’s costs arising from this request [ in the sum of £… ] within [ ] days of this letter. AND/OR All directions in the order of [ insert name ] dated [ date ] are extended correspondingly so that: ...

[ Insert date ] [ Insert ] Employment Tribunal [ Insert address ] To the [ insert ] Employment Tribunal [ Insert name of case, eg X v Y ] Claim Number: [ insert claim number ] Rule 21(1) Application for an extension of time for presenting the response after the time limit has expired We apply on the Respondent’s behalf, under rules 5(7) and 21 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, SI 2024/1155, for extra time to present the response. [ The Respondent’s draft response is enclosed with this application. OR The Respondent has been unable to attach its draft response because [ insert reasons ]. ] In addition to an extension, the Respondent asks the Tribunal to accept the response and to set aside any judgment entered under rule 22. The Respondent seeks an extension for the following reasons: [ insert reasons, eg: ] [ [ Example 1: ] Although the Tribunal sent the...

At the heart of the query lies the status of a party who does not adhere to a court direction, yet has lodged an application to extend the time for compliance before the expiry of the deadline attached to that direction. On the scenario set out, the claimant will be in breach of the court order concerning the exchange of witness statements in two weeks’ time, because that order will not have been varied before the deadline for compliance under that order...

From 1 October 2011, the majority of private sewers and lateral drains that, as at 1 July 2011, connected to a public sewer were automatically transferred by default to the sewerage undertaker, save where an appeal succeeded. Build over agreements are presently made between the water services company and the property owner; in the past, such agreements were concluded with the relevant local authority...