Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“We have to become more agile as our clients' expectations and requirements change. The only thing we know is that tomorrow is going to be different and we must be prepared. With LexisNexis, I feel more confident of that we're ready every time.”

Wolverhampton County Council

Access all documents on Fast-track (shortened) financial remedy procedure

Fast-track (shortened) financial remedy procedure meaning

Published by a LexisNexis Family expert
What does Fast-track (shortened) financial remedy procedure mean?
A streamlined Family Court route for financial remedy applications where only periodical payments are in issue. The “fast-track” label is used in the Family Procedure rules 2010 (as amended by the Family Procedure (amendment) Rules 2018, SI 2018/440) and related Practice Directions, rather than being a separate statutory regime. With effect from 4 June 2018 (for proceedings issued on or after that date), the fast-track procedure: - Applies to first-instance applications limited to periodical payments orders only under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, the Civil Partnership Act 2004, and Schedule 1 to the Children Act 1989; and - Applies to applications to vary orders for periodical payments only (subject to limited exceptions). Before 4 June 2018, the former “shortened”/“accelerated” procedure applied more broadly to variations of financial remedy orders. That wider scope has been curtailed: variations now within the fast-track are confined to periodical payments. Key features include simplified disclosure, tighter timetables, focused case management and usually fewer hearings than the standard financial remedy track used for capital claims and more complex relief. This procedure is specific to England and Wales. There is no directly equivalent named fast-track for financial provision in Scotland, Northern Ireland or Ireland, where different family procedure rules and terminology apply.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Checklists about Fast-track (shortened) financial remedy procedure

CHECKLISTS
Practitioners’ guide to Schedule 1 Children Act 1989 applications (England and Wales): jurisdiction, MIAMs, forms, standard and fast-track, FDR, orders, duration and variation

Procedure—Schedule 1 to the Children Act 1989 Unless an application seeks only periodical payments (ie no capital orders at all), an application under Schedule 1 to the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989) will proceed in accordance with the standard procedure. In the same way, where a party applies to vary an existing order, the fast-track route is available only where the variation concerns a periodical payments order and no form of capitalisation is requested. See Practice Note: Fast-track (shortened) financial remedy procedure. An application under ChA 1989, Sch 1 is issued in the Family Court and is allocated to a district judge. See Practice Notes: Procedure—Schedule 1 to the Children Act 1989 and Issuing financial proceedings in Form A (standard procedure). This Procedural Guide is primarily focused on applications proceeding under the standard procedure. The pre-action protocol and the overriding objective contained in the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010) apply to applications under ChA 1989, Sch 1—see Practice Note: Financial proceedings—pre-application requirements—Pre-application protocol (FPR 2010, PD...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Fast-track (shortened) financial remedy procedure

PRACTICE NOTES
Schedule 1 Children Act 1989 financial provision: jurisdiction (including CMS), procedure (fast-track/standard), disclosure, freezing orders and s 423 IA 1986, costs and variation (England and Wales)

Practice Note This Practice Note outlines the procedural requirements for applications under Schedule 1 to the Children Act 1989 seeking capital or maintenance for a child. It also addresses the financial remedy framework in the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010), SI 2010/2955, the court’s power to vary orders made under ChA 1989, Sch 1, and the relevant costs regime. Applications under ChA 1989, Sch 1 are governed by FPR 2010, SI 2010/2955. While an order under Sch 1 is a ‘financial remedy’, these proceedings are not ‘financial remedy proceedings’ as defined in FPR 2010, SI 2010/2955, 28.3(4)(b); accordingly, the usual ‘no order as to costs’ position does not apply—see: Costs in Schedule 1 cases. The fast‑track (shortened) financial remedy route previously applied to all Sch 1 applications; however, only an application seeking periodical payments alone will be dealt with under the fast‑track procedure. An application for a capital order, or one combining periodical payments with capital orders, will instead proceed under the...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Varying financial remedy orders: court powers, variable and non-variable orders, procedure and variation by agreement (England and Wales)

Practice Note This Practice Note outlines which financial orders the court may, and may not, alter. It further explains the court’s powers under section 31 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973) and the parallel provisions in the Civil Partnership Act 2004 (CPA 2004). It identifies which variation applications can follow the fast-track (shortened) route under the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010), SI 2010/2955, and highlights pertinent case law, as well as the means by which parties can vary an order by consent. Pursuant to MCA 1973, s 31, and the corresponding CPA 2004 provisions, the court may vary or discharge specified orders for financial relief—see: Orders that can be varied and Orders that cannot be varied. On occasion, the court may instead suspend an order, or reinstate a suspended term. This Practice Note describes the overarching provisions for applications to vary...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Periodical payments variation applications: fast-track, standard procedure, capitalisation and MIAM (England and Wales)

Application to vary a periodical payments (maintenance) order This Practice Note outlines how to pursue a variation of a periodical payments (maintenance) order. It covers the court’s discretion to capitalise maintenance on a variation application, the fast-track (shortened) financial remedy route under the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010), SI 2010/2955, and the obligation to attend a mediation information and assessment meeting (MIAM). It also sets out how to seek a direction that the standard financial remedy procedure should replace the fast-track (shortened) route. The fast-track (shortened) route is confined to applications varying a periodical payments order only. Any other type of variation application proceeds under the standard procedure. Where, on a variation of periodical payments, the applicant asks for the order to be dismissed (immediately or later) and replaced with one or more orders capitalising maintenance, the standard procedure applies: lump sum order property adjustment order pension sharing order pension compensation sharing order For further guidance, see Practice Notes:...

Read More Right Arrow