Powered by Lexis+®
Related Content

Related Glossary Terms

CASE STUDY

“LexisNexis is great as I can find the answers I am looking for really quickly. I believe that nothing should be more than 6 clicks away - and the products from LexisNexis deliver on this standard”

Avensure

Access all documents on Fatal accident inquiry

Fatal accident inquiry meaning

What does Fatal accident inquiry mean?
A fatal accident inquiry (FAI) is a public, court-based investigation in Scotland, conducted by a sheriff, to establish the circumstances of a death and to make recommendations to prevent future deaths. It is an inquisitorial process that determines facts; it does not decide civil or criminal liability. FAIs are governed by the Inquiries into Fatal Accidents and Sudden Deaths etc. (Scotland) Act 2016. The Lord Advocate decides whether to hold an inquiry and the Procurator Fiscal investigates and presents the case. An FAI is mandatory for deaths in legal custody and for work-related fatalities arising from accidents in Scotland. It is discretionary for other deaths where it is in the public interest, including certain deaths abroad with a Scottish connection. The sheriff’s determination typically covers when and where the death occurred, the cause, any reasonable precautions that might have prevented it, defects in systems of working, and other relevant facts. The sheriff may issue non-binding recommendations to organisations or regulators; statutory provision exists for written responses. Outside Scotland, the broadly equivalent process is a coroner’s inquest in England and Wales, Northern Ireland, and Ireland; the term “fatal accident inquiry” is not used in those jurisdictions.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about Fatal accident inquiry

NEWS
Local government weekly legal highlights—England and Wales (5 February 2026): social housing, adult social care, judicial review, governance, finance, children’s services, education, procurement, licensing, pensions and planning

In this issue: Social housing Adult social care Judicial review Governance Local government finance Children's social care Education Public procurement Licensing Pensions Planning LexTalk®Local Government: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Social housing Microwave alone insufficient to amount to ‘cooking facilities’ in HMO test (Oxford Hotel Investments Ltd v Great Yarmouth BC) In Oxford Hotel Investments Ltd v Great Yarmouth Borough Council, the Upper Tribunal (UT) assessed the meaning of cooking facilities within the section 254 Housing Act 2004 (HA 2004) HMO test, specifically whether a single microwave fulfilled that requirement. The property had no other means for preparing food. The UT determined that a microwave on its own does not constitute cooking facilities capable of excluding the premises from the definition of an HMO, and consequently found the property formed part of an HMO and was subject to the HA 2004 regime....

Read More Right Arrow