“What I spend on my yearly subscription, equals to a day's billable hours for me not to mention time efficiency and peace of mind.”
Jai SternAccess all documents on Financial Ombudsman Service
In this issue: Investigating criminal conduct Decision to prosecute and alternatives to prosecution Sentencing Bribery, corruption, sanctions and export controls Cybercrime and data protection offences Environmental offences Financial services and pensions offences Food safety and hygiene offences Fraud, forgery, tax and theft offences Health and safety and corporate manslaughter offences Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Useful information Investigating criminal conduct Whistleblowing in the UK—Still a long road ahead Rahman Ravelli’s legal director, Dr Angelika Hellweger, together with associate, Tatiana Novikova, examine how the UK handles whistleblowing. They map out the present UK statutory position and other relevant mechanisms, assess the scope of the safeguards they afford, and set these against the options open to whistleblowers in the United States of America. They also describe the HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) whistleblower reward initiative announced near the end of 2025,...
Also see: LNB News 17/09/2025 16. Instead of ring‑fencing crypto as a carve‑out dealt with via financial promotions and anti‑money laundering duties, the FCA intends to fold cryptoasset firms into the full Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSM 2000) framework. In practice, the FCA would normalise crypto by delivering like‑for‑like treatment for comparable risks, regardless of the technology. The article is set around four pillars: governance and accountability; market access and distribution; operational resilience and financial crime; and product and disclosure strategy. For businesses that have only sat within the Money Laundering Regulations (MLRs) boundary and the financial promotions regime, this shift brings a clear step‑up in oversight, responsibility and cost. Fundamentally, the consultation maps the FCA’s existing regulatory blueprint onto cryptoasset activities. That spans high‑level standards such as operational resilience and the Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SM&CR); business standards including environmental, social and governance; and supervision. The FCA is also considering if and how to apply its consumer duty and possible access...
In this issue: UK, EU and international regulators and bodies Prudential requirements Risk management and controls Operational resilience Financial crime and sanctions Complaints, compensation and claims management Investigations, enforcement and discipline Regulation of capital markets Sustainable finance and ESG Banks and mutuals Investment funds and asset management Consumer credit, mortgage and home finance Regulation of insurance Payment services and systems Fintech and cryptoassets Regulation of AI in FS Dates for your diary New and updated content Financial Services Enforcement Database Daily and weekly news alerts LexTalk®Financial Services: a Lexis®Nexis community UK, EU and international regulators and bodies ESAs publish spring 2026 joint risk update The three European Supervisory Authorities—the European Banking Authority, the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority, and the European Securities and Markets Authority—have released their Joint Committee spring 2026 update examining risks and vulnerabilities across the EU financial system....
FORTHCOMING CHANGE : The Pension Schemes Bill, anticipated to obtain Royal Assent in 2026, among other measures, would confer on the Pensions Ombudsman powers mirroring those of a competent court where pension overpayments must be recouped. As a result, trustees would no longer need to seek County Court orders in these matters, thereby cutting legal spend, easing administrative effort and promoting a swifter, more streamlined recovery for schemes and members, and ensuring a more efficient process overall. For more detail, see LNB News 05/06/2025 42 and Pension Schemes Bill—tracker — Pensions Ombudsman and overpayments. This Practice Note reviews the scope of the Pensions Ombudsman to handle occupational and personal pension complaints and disputes under its adjudication function, covering: who may bring or refer complaints/disputes which complaints/disputes fall within or outside its remit the powers he can exercise when determining matters relevant time limits Collectively, these areas define the Ombudsman’s jurisdiction under its adjudication service for both occupational and personal...
ARCHIVED This tracker is archived and is not being updated. It gathers significant pensions judgments from 2022, arranged by topic. The entries are organised by subject, with the topics listed in the Table of Contents on the left-hand side. Construction of scheme rules-revaluation De La Rue plc v De La Rue Pension Trustee Ltd Case information Full name: (1) De La Rue Plc (2) De La Rue Holdings Ltd (3) De La Rue International Ltd v (1) De La Rue Pension Trustee Ltd (2) Mark Crickett Citation: [2022] EWHC 48 (Ch), [2022] All ER (D) 50 (Jan) Court: High Court Judgment date: 14 January 2022 (hearing dates 15–16 December 2021) Representation: Keith Rowley QC and Elizabeth Ovey (instructed by Hogan Lovells International LLP) for the Claimants Henry Day (instructed by Hogan Lovells International LLP) for the First Defendant Andrew Mold QC (instructed by Osborne Clarke LLP) for the Second Defendant ...
Temporary permissions regime (TPR) and temporary marketing permissions regime (TMPR) This Practice Note examines the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA)/Bank of England (BoE) temporary permissions regime (TPR) and the temporary marketing permissions regime (TMPR), introduced at the close of the implementation period following the UK’s exit from the EU. The TPR has concluded (31 December 2023). In contrast, the TMPR for EEA UCITS remains operative and has been extended to 31 December 2026 to aid transition to the Overseas Funds Regime (OFR). These arrangements allowed EEA passporting firms and funds to continue UK activities for a limited duration after the implementation period while pursuing full UK authorisation or recognition. The European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (EU(W)A 2018), as amended by the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 2020 (EU(WA)A 2020), enabled ratification and domestic implementation of the Withdrawal Agreement between the UK and the EU. The Withdrawal Agreement set the framework for the UK’s departure, including a transition period (termed by the UK government the ‘implementation...
225 The scheme and the scheme operator(1) This Part provides for a scheme under which certain disputes may be resolved quickly and with minimum formality by an independent person.(2) The scheme is to be administered by a body corporate (“the scheme operator”).(3) The scheme is to be operated under a name chosen by the scheme operator but is referred to in this Act as “the ombudsman scheme”.(4) Schedule 17 makes provision in connection with the ombudsman scheme and the scheme operator.
(1) A complaint which relates to an act or omission of a person (“the respondent”) in carrying on an activity to which voluntary jurisdiction rules apply is to be dealt with under the ombudsman scheme if the conditions mentioned in subsection (2) are satisfied.(2) The conditions are that—(a) the complainant is eligible and wishes to have the complaint dealt with under the scheme;(b) at the time of the act or omission to which the complaint relates, the respondent was participating in the scheme;(c) at the time when the complaint is referred under the scheme, the respondent has not withdrawn from the scheme in accordance with its provisions;(d) the act or omission to which the com
[(1) This section applies where a person (the “successor”) has assumed a liability (including a contingent one) of a person (the “predecessor”) who was, or (apart from this section) would have been, the respondent in respect of a complaint falling to be dealt with under the ombudsman scheme.(2) The complaint may (but need not) be dealt with under this Part as if the successor were the respondent.]