Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“We rely on LexisNexis to give us a definitive answer, quickly and reliable every time so that we can be confident in the advice we use to help our clients.”

Shelter

Access all documents on Fixed charge of non-vesting debts

Fixed charge of non-vesting debts meaning

What does Fixed charge of non-vesting debts mean?
A fixed charge over non-vesting debts is security granted by a seller in a receivables purchase to cover receivables that were intended to be assigned to the purchaser but do not effectively transfer (for example, because of a prohibition on assignment, failure of formalities, lack of notice/perfection, or defects in title). It protects the receivables purchaser until legal or equitable title can vest. Key features and practice: the charge is intended to attach to specified receivables and their proceeds. In England & Wales and Northern Ireland, case law (including Spectrum Plus) requires the purchaser to exercise sufficient control over collections and proceeds (for example, a blocked account and no free use by the seller) for the security to be fixed; otherwise it risks recharacterisation as a floating charge. It is commonly included as back-up security in factoring, invoice discounting and securitisation, either in a standalone charge or within a debenture. Jurisdictional notes: in Scotland, the equivalent is typically an assignation in security over claims, perfected by intimation or registration in the Register of Assignations; “fixed charge” is not the technical term. In Ireland, fixed charges over book debts are recognised, with control over proceeds central in case law. Registration is required (Companies...
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Practice Notes about Fixed charge of non-vesting debts

PRACTICE NOTES
Waterfall of payments: comparative priorities in liquidation, administration, administrative receivership, CVAs, Part 26A restructuring plans and bankruptcy, including moratorium and priority pre-moratorium debts

Liquidation Following enforcement of security by fixed charge creditors for their own benefit, the order of distributions in a winding up is: if liquidation commences within 12 weeks of a moratorium, any unpaid moratorium debts and ‘priority pre‑moratorium debts’ to which no payment holiday applied during the moratorium expenses properly incurred in the winding up (including the liquidator’s remuneration) ordinary preferential debts secondary preferential debts the prescribed part for unsecured creditors (where not disapplied) debts secured by floating charges unsecured debts statutory interest postponed debts (i.e. non‑provable liabilities) return of any surplus to members (subject to adjustment between members) For further details, see Practice Note: Waterfall of payments in liquidation...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Floating charges for lenders: trading flexibility, QFCH appointment rights, invalidity risks and insolvency priority deductions versus fixed charges (England and Wales)

Advantages and disadvantages of taking a floating as opposed to a fixed charge This Practice Note examines the advantages and disadvantages of taking a floating, rather than a fixed, charge, mainly from the chargee’s perspective, and why understanding the trade-offs is important. In secured lending, it is common for lenders to place fixed charges over non-variable assets of a company and a floating charge across the balance. This blended approach enables a lender to maximise the key benefits offered by each form of security while achieving coverage across the asset base. Fixed charges, where they can be obtained, usually produce better recoveries on enforcement. By contrast, holding a qualifying floating charge allows a lender to appoint an administrator out of court and to take security over a broader range of assets. Even so, the exact configuration of security over a company’s assets is often negotiated with the borrower. A borrower may, in particular, resist the level of control over its assets that...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Asset-based lending under English law: receivables, inventory, plant and machinery, real estate; borrowing base, fixed and floating charges, ROT/CRAR, insolvency and intercreditor issues

This Practice Note sets out a concise overview of the financing structures typically used by UK asset-based lenders and highlights the key English law legal issues encountered when funding receivables (often called book debts) in the asset-based lending market, together with one or more of the following assets: inventory (also referred to as stock) plant and machinery (also referred to as equipment) real estate cashflow loan It also summarises common asset-based lending structures and the principal issues to consider when arranging asset-based financing. Key features of asset-based lending ABL is senior, secured lending primarily intended to fund a trading business’s working capital. Advances are determined by the realisable value of defined classes of a borrower’s assets, collectively known as the borrowing base. ABL is often event-led, offering flexible access to liquidity during periods of transition, such as an acquisition or a restructuring. An asset-based lender invariably provides receivables financing (see: Receivables financing below) as the anchor facility, supplemented by...

Read More Right Arrow