Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“I'm able to do more in the day, which means I'm providing more value to my clients - and it's helped my margins in terms of how much I can bill. LexisNexis is helping me make money.”

ParrisWhittaker

Access all documents on Force Majeure Event

Force Majeure Event meaning

What does Force Majeure Event mean?
An event beyond the reasonable control of the parties that prevents or materially delays contractual performance, for which neither party is responsible, and which triggers the contractual force majeure clause and relief. Across England and Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland, force majeure is not a statutory doctrine and has no standalone common-law effect; its consequences depend on contract wording (the common-law fallback is frustration). In commercial contracts, a force majeure event is usually exhaustively defined and will typically include war, terrorism, nuclear, chemical or biological contamination, and pressure waves from aircraft or devices travelling at supersonic speed. Clauses commonly require prompt notice, mitigation, use of available insurances and reasonable endeavours to overcome the effects; they may suspend obligations, excuse delay, avoid deductions or liability for liquidated damages, and, if the event persists beyond a long-stop period, permit termination. In pfi/pf2 project agreements and project finance documents, the term is tightly drafted and sits within a detailed supervening events regime. Risk is allocated to, and operational response managed by, project co, reflecting its insurance programme and service delivery responsibilities. Usage and legal approach are broadly consistent across the UK and Ireland, subject to the parties’ drafting.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Checklists about Force Majeure Event

CHECKLISTS
Managing pandemic risk in commercial contracts: in-house checklist for reviewing existing and new agreements—force majeure, change in law, continuity, governance, key personnel, pricing, security

This Checklist is intended for in-house lawyers. It outlines the clauses to weigh up to safeguard your organisation in both current and future contracts should a pandemic arise. Read it alongside Practice Note: Pandemic risk management guide. See also Practice Note: Drafting for unforeseen events—commercial contracts. Force majeure Clause: Existing contract | New contract See Q&As: Will our force majeure provision cover the economic impact of coronavirus (COVID-19)? Is a force majeure clause enforceable in a business-to-consumer agreement due to coronavirus (COVID-19)? Does coronavirus (COVID-19) amount to biological contamination for the purposes of a force majeure definition? Is the force majeure definition restricted to a fixed list of events, without broader wording such as ‘without limitation’ or similar? Where a force majeure event is described as beyond a party’s reasonable control, ‘including but not limited to’ specified examples, would a court treat that list as indicative of the type of qualifying event? See also Precedent: Force...

Read More Right Arrow
CHECKLISTS
War-related force majeure in energy contracts: English law checklist on triggers, thresholds, causation, mitigation, notices, frustration and termination consequences, and drafting for future risk

Checklist Intensifying geopolitical conflict — including open hostilities, regional volatility, cyber interference and closure of sea lanes — can exert rapid, multifaceted strain on energy-sector contracts. This checklist offers a structured, practical approach to evaluating force majeure (FM) risk in an active conflict or war setting, and to judging whether FM can be effectively invoked under English law. It also maps how that assessment intersects with frustration and contractual termination rights, and sets out drafting considerations for parties to weigh in future transactions so that FM provisions expressly address war risks. It is intended for legal and commercial teams operating across oil and gas, LNG, trading, infrastructure and energy supply chains, where disruption frequently stems from direct physical impossibility at the point of delivery, or indirectly via upstream or downstream domino effects. The objective is not solely to test the viability of an FM claim, but also to enable informed, risk-aware choices in rapidly evolving conflict environments. This checklist focuses on FM arising from war-related physical and operational disruption....

Read More Right Arrow
CHECKLISTS
Force majeure in commercial contracts: drafting and negotiation checklist on definitions, triggers, causation, notice, remedies, termination and business continuity under English law

For model force majeure provisions with comprehensive drafting notes, consult: Precedents: Force majeure clause; Force majeure and business continuity clause; Force majeure event definition Practice Notes on force majeure: consequences and contract discharge; clause analysis-a practical guide; key and illustrative decisions Related guidance: Practice Note-Discharge by frustration; Practice Note-Drafting for unforeseen events-commercial contracts; Commercial contracts in difficult times-resources-checklist Legal Issues General comments Force majeure provisions release a party from contractual duties when a disruptive event arises beyond that party’s reasonable control... What to watch out for Under English law, force majeure applies only where expressly included in the contract terms, though the doctrine of frustration may have relevance, and in practice its scope is usually narrower. See Practice Note: Discharge by frustration... General considerations There is no court-approved, universal definition of ‘force majeure’, so the parties’ intended meaning must be...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related News about Force Majeure Event

NEWS
GDPR Article 82(3) and force majeure: stricter compensation defence and contractual implications for joint controllers and controller-processor relationships under the DPA 2018

How has the exemption available for controllers under the GDPR in relation to liability to compensate data subjects changed? Under the earlier Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC (Article 23(2)), where a person was entitled to damages from a controller due to unlawful processing, the controller could rely on a potential exemption if it was not responsible for the event that caused the loss. Recital 55 offered two illustrations of situations for which the controller would not bear responsibility: a mistake by the data subject, and a case of force majeure The language of these provisions lacked clarity, and the concept of ‘force majeure’ has no consistent definition across EU legal systems (it does not even carry a settled meaning in English law, depending heavily on contractual wording). Unsurprisingly, this carve-out, and the reference to force majeure, was therefore loosely carried across into national implementing legislation. For example, the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA 1998) gave a controller a defence in claims for compensation...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Banking & Finance 2024: Key England and Wales cases on force majeure, security characterisation, default interest, intercreditor payments, cryptoassets, LIBOR transition, sanctions, administration, immovables rule and transactions at an undervalue

Banking & Finance 2024 case round up Force majeure—shipping contract—reasonable endeavours RTI Ltd (Respondent) v MUR Shipping BV (Appellant) [2024] UKSC 18 This Supreme Court decision examines how a force majeure clause in a shipping contract between MUR Shipping BV (MUR) and RTI Ltd (RTI) should be interpreted. Such clauses excuse a party from performing when specified events outside the parties’ reasonable control (acts of God) occur. They frequently contain a ‘reasonable endeavours’ proviso, which prevents a party from invoking force majeure if the consequences could be averted by taking reasonable steps. The appeal turned on whether those reasonable endeavours required the party seeking to rely on force majeure to accept an offer of performance that did not match the contract terms. In this instance, the suggested alternative was payment in euros rather than US dollars. The Supreme Court unanimously allowed the appeal, ruling that MUR’s refusal to accept RTI’s non-contractual proposal did not amount to a failure to exercise reasonable endeavours...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
UK banking and finance case round-up (May 2024): force majeure reasonable endeavours, co‑guarantor release under personal guarantees, and control‑based fixed v floating charges over IP addresses

Banking & Finance—May 2024 case round-up RTI Ltd (Respondent) v MUR Shipping BV (Appellant) [2024] UKSC 18 Force majeure—shipping contract—reasonable endeavours This Supreme Court judgment examined the meaning of a force majeure provision in a seaborne carriage contract between MUR Shipping BV (MUR) and RTI Ltd (RTI). A force majeure clause releases a party from performing contractual obligations where specified contingencies arise that are beyond the parties’ reasonable control (acts of God). Frequently, such clauses contain a ‘reasonable endeavours’ rider, which prevents reliance on a force majeure event if its impact could be avoided through the exercise of reasonable endeavours. The pivotal issue on appeal was whether satisfying that reasonable endeavours requirement meant the party seeking to invoke the clause had to accept an offer of performance that fell outside the contract. In this dispute, the proposed departure from the contract concerned the currency of payment: a tender in euros rather than in US dollars. The offer related only to the settlement currency proposed...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Force Majeure Event

PRACTICE NOTES
Frustration of contracts under English law: leading authorities, multi-factorial test, and recent applications (COVID-19, sanctions, Brexit), with contrasts to force majeure across leases, aviation, finance, shipping and arbitration

Frustration Frustration is a doctrine under English law that creates a common law right to bring a contract to an end when a frustrating event arises after the contract date. See Practice Note: Discharge by frustration. It is a notoriously demanding contention to establish. The doctrine injects uncertainty into contractual relationships, which the courts do not view favourably. For step-by-step guidance on assessing a possible frustration situation, see Practice Note: Frustration event analysis—a practical guide. You should also review the cases set out below, both for general direction on the stages involved and to demonstrate the courts’ stance. They are presented in reverse chronological sequence. Always remember that each dispute is fact sensitive and will be decided on its own merits, especially in light of the ‘multi-factorial approach’ endorsed in Edwinton Commercial Corp v Tsavliris Russ (Worldwide Salvage and Towage) Ltd, The Sea Angel. The common law doctrine is sometimes considered alongside any contractual right allowing parties to suspend and/or terminate obligations without liability where a force...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Frustration of contracts under English law: a step-by-step practitioner guide to events, causation, limits, timing, proof, remedies and alternatives (force majeure, sanctions, Brexit, COVID-19)

Practice Note on frustration This Practice Note offers a practical steer on assessing whether an unforeseen occurrence has frustrated a contract. It should be read alongside Practice Note: Discharge by frustration. Frustration is a common law doctrine in English law. It brings an agreement to an immediate close where an unexpected supervening event frustrates the bargain, making performance impossible, unlawful or so fundamentally different from what was originally agreed. Where frustration bites, all future duties under the contract are extinguished. Money paid before the supervening event and discharge can be reclaimed, while sums not yet due cease to be payable, subject to the court’s discretion under the Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943 (LR(FC)A 1943) to permit recovery of expenses previously incurred. Establishing frustration is notoriously difficult. The doctrine injects uncertainty into contractual dealings, a result the courts regard unfavourably, and so it is applied within narrow limits (The Super Servant Two). For a tabular overview of the key frustration authorities, see Practice Note: Frustration—key and illustrative...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
UK Insurance and Reinsurance Glossary for Lawyers: Legal, Regulatory, Market, Underwriting and Claims Terms

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z This glossary provides helpful (re)insurance and underwriting definitions. For focused guidance on reinsurance terminology, see Practice Note: Reinsurance—essentials. A Accident An unforeseen or unintended event or incident that typically results in damage or injury (physical or financial) to the insured or a third party. Accidental damage Unintended or unexpected harm or damage caused to property or a person. Accidental death benefit Some life insurance policies pay an extra amount, over and above the original sum insured, if the insured dies because of an accident. Act of God (force majeure) An occurrence beyond anyone’s control, such as a natural disaster. Active underwriter The person with primary responsibility and authority to accept insurance and reinsurance risks on behalf of the members of a syndicate in the Lloyd’s market. See also Underwriter. Actuary A qualified professional who...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Precedents about Force Majeure Event

PRECEDENTS
Precedent Force Majeure Event Notice under the 2002 ISDA Master Agreement (Sections 5(b)(ii), 5(d) and 6(b))

Notice of a Force Majeure Event [ Insert lead-in wording ] We hereby give notice to you that the following matters have arisen and are in effect: [ Set out, with a suitable degree of specificity, the facts giving rise to the Force Majeure Event, including the particular force majeure occurrence or act of state. Your narrative should be sufficiently detailed and aligned with the wording of Section 5(b)(ii) so that the counterparty can reasonably understand the basis for your determination. ] This serves as notice pursuant to Section 6(b)(i) of the Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, this notice does not fix or nominate an Early Termination Date under the Agreement...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Precedent Service Level Schedule for SaaS Availability (Uptime): Calculation Method, Exclusions, Service Credits, Reporting, and Termination for Critical Service Level Failure

Service Level Agreement 1 Definitions 1.1 In this Schedule: Available/Availability denotes that the [ core functionality of the ] Hosted Solution is [ materially ] ready for use [ in accordance with its Specification ] by the Customer, determined as follows: A = (PU – X) / (PU) (x 100 to be expressed as a percentage) A stands for Available; PU stands for Potential Uptime; X stands for the combined total minutes in total in the relevant Month (excluding Downtime) when the Hosted Solution is not Available; [ Critical Service Level Failure means [ either: (i) the Supplier’s failure to meet the Service Level for [ three Months ] within any [ six Month ] timeframe; or (ii) the Supplier’s failure to maintain Availability above [ Z% ] during any one Month OR define as appropriate ] ; ] Customer Connectivity means the telecoms and information technology hardware and network infrastructure required to reach the Hosted Solution from the Customer’s premises; Downtime means any...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Customer‑favourable manufacturing and supply agreement with quality, pricing, delivery, IP, audits, product recall, data protection and compliance provisions (governed by the laws of England and Wales)

This Agreement is dated [ insert date ] and is made between 1 [ insert name of customer ] [ of OR a company incorporated in [ England and Wales ] with number [ insert registered number ] whose registered office is situated at ] [ insert address ] (Customer); and 2 [ insert name of manufacturer ] [ of OR a company incorporated in [ England and Wales ] with number [ insert registered number ] whose registered office is situated at ] [ insert address ] (Manufacturer), each of the Customer and the Manufacturer being a party, and the Customer and the Manufacturer are jointly the parties. Background: (A) The Customer Group [ manufactures, distributes and sells [ insert ] ]. (B) The Manufacturer possesses the facilities, production capacity, technical expertise, personnel, skills and experience to produce the Product. (C) The Customer intends to purchase, and the Manufacturer intends to manufacture and sell to the Customer, the Product on the terms and...

Read More Right Arrow