Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

Related Glossary Terms

CASE STUDY

“It really is saving us a huge number of hours over the days, weeks and months. Having more relevant support at hand, not having to draft or review documents them from scratch - it all adds up.”

Southampton FC

Access all documents on Foreground technology

Foreground technology meaning

What does Foreground technology mean?
Foreground technology describes technology, data and intellectual property created during a collaboration, joint venture or research and development project, as opposed to pre‑existing Background technology. It is a descriptive, contract‑driven term rather than one defined by legislation or case law; parties normally define its scope in the relevant agreement. Foreground technology commonly includes inventions and patents (and applications), copyright in software and reports, designs, database rights, know‑how/trade secrets, data, materials, prototypes and improvements. Agreements typically allocate ownership (creator‑owned or jointly owned), grant exploitation and licence‑back/access rights, and impose confidentiality, assignment and registration obligations, publication controls and revenue‑sharing. Usage is broadly consistent across England and Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland, though default rules on employee inventions, joint ownership and formalities for assigning or licensing IP can differ between jurisdictions. Clear drafting on governing law, ownership, exploitation rights and access to Background technology is therefore essential. In practice, defining Foreground technology underpins IP due diligence, commercialisation, freedom to operate and collaboration management, ensuring that results generated under the project can be exploited as agreed by the participating parties.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Practice Notes about Foreground technology

PRACTICE NOTES
IPR in UK Outsourcing: Ownership (Background/Foreground), Licensing, Open Source, AI/RPA, Warranties, Indemnities and Exit

Intellectual property rights (IPR) can frequently become flashpoints and areas of dispute in outsourcing contract discussions and negotiations. Questions typically centre on the ownership and the licensing of rights, and also on the warranties and indemnities that each party seeks from the other concerning their authority to supply IPR (or provide access to it). This Practice Note addresses the following: Is intellectual property core to the deal? Categories of IPR in outsourcing arrangements Background IPR Foreground IPR Open source software New technologies including artificial intelligence (AI) and robotic process automation (RPA) Warranties and indemnities Handling of IPR on exit For illustrative clauses on IPR in outsourcing, refer to clause 29 in Precedent: Outsourcing agreement—long form. For a template IPR indemnity clause, see Precedents: Third party intellectual property rights indemnity clause—pro-supplier and Third party intellectual property rights indemnity clause—pro-customer. Is intellectual property core to the deal? In some outsourcing projects, the creation and ownership of...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
UK outsourcing agreements: key terms and drafting issues (transition, service levels, charges, IP, TUPE, UK GDPR, audit, benchmarking, governance, liability, step in, termination, exit)

This Practice Note This Practice Note explores the principal provisions found in a standard outsourcing contract, including transition and transformation, service scope, service level measures, pricing structures, intellectual property, TUPE in outsourcing, benchmarking, data protection, customer obligations, governance, step-in, limits on liability, termination and exit. It also considers the impact of the UK GDPR on outsourcing arrangements... Outsourcing involves engaging a third party supplier to run certain business processes, functions or responsibilities that were previously performed by the customer in a first generation outsourcing, or by another third party supplier in a second or subsequent generation outsourcing. This Practice Note outlines the key terms relevant to most outsourcing arrangements (including information technology (IT) and business process (BPO) outsourcing)... Transition and transformation Service description Service levels Charges Intellectual property Employment and TUPE Data protection and the UK GDPR Customer responsibilities and dependencies Record retention and audit Continuous improvement, benchmarking and most-favoured customer Governance Limitation of...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Drafting and negotiating research services contracts: scope, key personnel, consents and licences, reporting, fees, confidentiality, IP ownership, warranties and indemnities, liability limits, termination, and practical guidance for commissioners and providers

Practice Note This Practice Note sets out the principal issues in research services contracts from the standpoints of both the provider and the commissioning party. It assesses matters concerning the project scope and key staff, who secures regulatory permissions or approvals, any required third-party licences, available resources, the agreed reporting arrangements and process, fees, confidentiality, background and foreground intellectual property rights (IPRs), handling of research outputs, trade marks, warranties, indemnities, limitations on liability and termination. These agreements are needed where a business is outsourcing research to a third party with specialist knowledge and skills. In practice, the research services provider might be a university or other academic institution, or a contract research organisation whose sole activity is delivering research services. For example, such arrangements are particularly prevalent in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors, though they may equally be adopted in other areas. They are distinct from collaborative and joint research projects because, once the agreement ends, the research services provider typically has no continuing role in the project...

Read More Right Arrow