Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“LexisLibrary gives us the most relevant and recent cases and always has the latest information on them. It makes research so much easier. We're more cost-effective for our clients and more efficient each day”

Advocates

Access all documents on Fradulent trading

Fradulent trading meaning

What does Fradulent trading mean?
Fraudulent trading describes carrying on a company’s business with an intention to cheat or deceive creditors, or for any other fraudulent purpose. It is a statutory concept: in England and Wales and Scotland, Insolvency Act 1986, s 213 permits the court, on a liquidator’s application during winding up, to order any person who was knowingly party to such conduct to contribute to the company’s assets. It is also a criminal offence under Companies Act 2006, s 993. In Northern Ireland, the equivalent civil remedy is in the Insolvency (Northern Ireland) Order 1989, art 75; the criminal offence is likewise under Companies Act 2006, s 993. In Ireland, comparable relief is available under Companies Act 2014, s 610 (fraudulent or reckless trading), with a separate criminal offence in s 722. Key features include: proof of actual intent to defraud; liability of any person knowingly party (not only directors); typical pursuit by the liquidator or official receiver; potential personal contribution orders, criminal penalties and director disqualification. It is distinct from wrongful trading (which does not require fraudulent intent). Usage and effect are broadly consistent across the UK, with closely aligned Irish provisions.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Practice Notes about Fradulent trading

PRACTICE NOTES
Comprehensive glossary of UK restructuring and insolvency terms, covering Companies Act schemes, Part 26A plans, IA 1986 processes, and cross‑border concepts including COMI, UNCITRAL and assimilated EU rules.

This glossary sets out numerous expressions regularly encountered in the restructuring & insolvency sphere. Words shown in bold within definitions are themselves explained in other entries in this glossary as well. A Article X The MLIJ contains a single provision named Article X, aimed at jurisdictions that have already implemented the MLCBI, like England, or are weighing its adoption. Article X states: ‘Not withstanding any prior interpretation to the contrary, the relief available under [insert a cross-reference to the legislation of this State enacting Article 21 of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency] includes recognition and enforcement of a judgment’ (see Practice Note: UNCITRAL model law on recognition and enforcement of insolvency-related judgments (MLIJ): Article X). Asset-backed security (ABS) A form of security anchored by asset pools, for example loans, leases, and credit card receivables. Assimilated law From 1 January 2024, ‘retained law’ has been retitled ‘assimilated law’. The body of domestic law originally arising from EU obligations, created by the European...

Read More Right Arrow