Powered by Lexis+®
CASE STUDY

“It's hard to quantify, right now. But at a guess, I'd say it's probably more than 50% faster, at times. It's literally that quick. We've found to be an essential practical tool. We're very satisfied.”

Walsall Council

Access all documents on Fully allocated cost

Fully allocated cost meaning

What does Fully allocated cost mean?
In legal practice, fully allocated cost (also called fully distributed cost) describes the total cost attributed to a product or service once all direct costs and an appropriate share of indirect and common overheads have been allocated across the undertaking’s activities. It is not generally defined in legislation or case law, but is a descriptive accounting approach used in regulatory, competition, procurement and public‑sector charging matters across the UK and Ireland. Key features include: allocation of common costs that are not directly attributable to a particular service; use of allocation bases or cost drivers; and results that can vary with methodology. Fully allocated cost is distinct from marginal, incremental or avoidable cost measures. Typical usage: regulators frequently require fully allocated cost in regulatory accounts and price controls (for example in communications, energy, transport and water). Competition authorities may use fully allocated cost as a benchmark in predatory pricing or margin squeeze analyses where appropriate. Public bodies often refer to “full cost recovery” when setting fees and charges, which similarly includes overheads. Usage and meaning are broadly consistent across England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland, guided by sector‑specific regulatory accounting rules and public finance guidance (for example HM Treasury’s Managing Public...
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Practice Notes about Fully allocated cost

PRACTICE NOTES
EPC turnkey contracts: contractor claims, entitlements and procedures—variations, site risks, force majeure, dispute resolution (FIDIC DAAB/DAB, expert determination) and HGCRA 1996 adjudication

EPC (engineering, procurement and construction) arrangements are often conceived as turnkey deals—the contractor delivers the facility and the employer simply turns the key to a fully completed plant. The employer’s objective in such agreements is to shift virtually all project risks to its EPC contractor, with the price reflecting that allocation. In practice, the works are delivered complete, most risks are allocated to the contractor, and the price is set to reflect this. However, the contractor may still advance claims under turnkey terms in defined situations. This Practice Note examines what claims EPC contractors might bring, the steps for initiating a claim or resolving a dispute about one, and the key issues to address when negotiating the contract in light of these potential claims. Possible claims EPC contracts are typically drafted so that the bulk of risk sits with the contractor. There are solid commercial justifications for this—cost inflation can create funding challenges where project finance cannot absorb marked price rises. Likewise, an employer may have entered arrangements...

Read More Right Arrow