Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

Related Glossary Terms

CASE STUDY

“We rely on LexisNexis to give us a definitive answer, quickly and reliable every time so that we can be confident in the advice we use to help our clients.”

Shelter

Access all documents on Gender re-assignment discrimination

Gender re-assignment discrimination meaning

What does Gender re-assignment discrimination mean?
Gender re-assignment discrimination describes treating someone less favourably, subjecting them to a detriment, harassment or victimisation because they propose to undergo, are undergoing, or have undergone gender transition. It commonly arises in employment, education, premises, and goods and services decisions. In England, Wales and Scotland, it is unlawful discrimination because of the protected characteristic of gender reassignment under the Equality Act 2010 (s.7). The protection applies whether or not medical supervision or surgery is involved and covers policies, practices and one-off acts. Limited exceptions may apply, for example genuine occupational requirements and certain single-sex services, which are narrowly construed. In Northern Ireland, comparable protection exists under the Sex Discrimination (Northern Ireland) Order 1976, as amended to cover gender reassignment, covering employment and the provision of goods, facilities and services. In Ireland, discrimination against a trans person—whether intending to transition, transitioning or having transitioned—is generally treated as unlawful discrimination on the gender ground under the Employment Equality Acts 1998–2015 and the Equal Status Acts 2000–2018. The phrase gender re-assignment discrimination is used descriptively rather than as a defined statutory term.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about Gender re-assignment discrimination

NEWS
UK Public Law Weekly Update: Brexit Oversight Changes, Constitutional Developments, Leading JR and ECHR Cases, Equality and Human Rights, Subsidy Control and Procurement Act Guidance—8 August 2024

In this issue: Brexit highlights Post-Brexit transition guidance Constitutional and administrative law Judicial review Equality and human rights Subsidy control and State aid Public procurement Management and strategic planning Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers New Q&As Useful information Brexit highlights The UK Parliament has confirmed the European Scrutiny Committee has been wound up, following the House of Commons’ decision on 30 July 2024 not to re-establish it. See: LNB News 01/08/2024 97. The House of Lords European Affairs Committee has released correspondence spanning 7 November 2023 to 30 May 2024, covering scrutiny of EU papers, primary legislation (including the Illegal Migration Bill) and broader issues such as public procurement and the impacts of the UK’s EU withdrawal. See: LNB News 01/08/2024 99. Post-Brexit transition guidance Weekly roundup of HMRC import, export and...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
UK Public Law update: Supreme Court on Equality Act ‘sex’ and clinician anonymity; judicial review timing; procurement, FOI and ICO guidance; immigration and SEND funding; state aid and customs updates

In this issue Equality and human rights Constitutional and administrative law Judicial review Public procurement Subsidy control and State aid Post-Brexit transition guidance Information law Other Public Law news Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Useful information No Weekly Highlights on 24 April 2025 Equality and human rights Supreme Court rules that the EqA 2010 terms ‘man’, ‘woman’ and ‘sex’ denote biological sex (For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers). In For Women Scotland Ltd v Scottish Ministers [2025] UKSC 16, the UK Supreme Court unanimously concluded that these terms identify biological sex rather than ‘certificated sex’. The court determined that those holding a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC) are not included within the EqA 2010 definition of their acquired gender. The ruling confirms that trans people remain safeguarded by the Act’s gender reassignment provisions and may pursue sex discrimination claims where...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Local government law update—12 June 2025: Supreme Court ruling on Equality Act sex, planning reforms, Vagrancy Act repeal, NHS procurement slavery regulations, education AI guidance, Sizewell C funding

In this issue: Governance Planning Social housing Children’s social care Social care Healthcare Education Environmental law and climate change Local government finance Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Governance Equality Act 2010 provisions refer to biological sex, regardless of gender recognition certificate (For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers) The Supreme Court ruled that, within the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010), the words ‘man’, ‘woman’ and ‘sex’ denote biological sex. Treating the relevant provisions as embracing ‘certificated sex’ by virtue of a gender recognition certificate (GRC) would render them incoherent and unworkable, and thus cannot be done. For sex discrimination claims, an individual has the protected characteristic of biological sex only. The relevant parts of the EqA 2010 fall within section 9(3) of the Gender Recognition Act 2004 (GRA 2004), and so displace the section 9(1) rule that a person with a GRC is, for all purposes, of the acquired...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Gender re-assignment discrimination

PRACTICE NOTES
Direct discrimination under the Equality Act 2010: comparators, causation, age justification, pregnancy and maternity, disability, associative and perceived discrimination

Direct discrimination under the Equality Act 2010 This Practice Note explores direct discrimination within the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010), namely the treatment of an individual less favourably because of a protected characteristic (ie unfavourable treatment on discriminatory grounds). It addresses in particular the requirement for a comparison, the role of comparators (real or hypothetical), the meaning of ‘because of’, awareness of disability, the justification of direct age discrimination, direct sex discrimination arising from a contractual provision, and equality of terms. It also covers more favourable treatment in relation to pregnancy, childbirth (which must be proportionate), and disabled people. It examines racial segregation in this context. Lastly, it analyses third-party characteristics: associative discrimination, discrimination based on perceived characteristics, and absence from work due to gender reassignment. This Practice Note cites case law from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). For guidance on whether judgments of the CJEU are binding on UK courts, see Practice Note: Assimilated law—Assimilated case law...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related UK Parliament Acts about Gender re-assignment discrimination

UK PARLIAMENT ACTS
4 The protected characteristics

4  The protected characteristicsThe following characteristics are protected characteristics—age;disability;gender reassignment;marriage and civil partnership;pregnancy and maternity;race;religion or belief;sex;sexual orientation.

UK PARLIAMENT ACTS
7 Gender reassignment

(1)     A person has the protected characteristic of gender reassignment if the person is proposing to undergo, is undergoing or has undergone a process (or part of a process) for the purpose of reassigning the person's sex by changing physiological or other attributes of sex.(2)     A reference to a transsexual person is a reference to a person who has the protected characteristic of gender reassignment.(3)     In relation to the protected characteristic of gender reassignment—(a)     a reference to a person who has a particular protected characteristic is a reference to a transsexual person;(b)     a reference to